The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lift-Off Film Festival Network

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Alleged to be a csd-eligable article, G7 has been turned down. History shows COI issues and at least one confirmed copyvio image which was removed from the commons repository. Listing here for community input. TomStar81 (Talk) 09:15, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. COI and using copyvio images are not grounds for deletion. But lack of notability certainly is. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:09, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 18:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 18:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there are no signs of better satisfying the applicable notability and the listed coverage is also not noticeably satisfying. SwisterTwister talk 00:59, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I still think that it gets enough mention to be notable enough to not get deleted. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 23:06, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.