The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:56, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lima: Breaking the Silence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES; I found no RS reviews in a WP:BEFORE and no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. The Film Creator (talk) 13:25, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 14:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 14:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 14:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• I found nothing during a WP:BEFORE. Geschichte (talk) 20:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Some significant sources are provided in previous AFD. Neocorelight (Talk) 22:13, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:28, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as per the multiple reliable sources reviews found in the first AFD as shown in this comment from the AfD: "There are a couple reviews in the Spanish article that seem noteworthy: the El Comercio (Peru) review and the rayray.utero.pe review. The book source has a couple paragraphs about the film. cinencuentro.com looks like it could be reliable though it seems to be a niche website. The German article has this Film Dienst source with a "long review" hidden behind a paywall. Other than that, the New Video source looks like minor/routine coverage. Overall, the amount of coverage is somewhat underwhelming for an American film released in 1999, but I think it might be just enough to meet WP:NFILM guidelines. I think I would support either keeping the article or merging some of it to the director's article, Menahem Golan. Mz7 (talk) 19:51, 7 October 2020 (UTC) , imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:13, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, due to sources pointed by Mz7 from previous AfD, including reviews in Spanish.Fulmard (talk) 19:24, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.