The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep and cleanup. I stubbified the article. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 01:36, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lincoln Center Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article reads like an advert, is unsourced, and the only external link offered is to the organisation's own website. DB 103 245-7 Talk 19:15, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incubate. Though poorly-written and seemingly promotional, the subject actually appears to be notable as the performing arts school associated with the Lincoln Center. A quick internet search turns up several more sources, including a ref from Harvard [1] among others. The article has no place on Wikipedia in its present form, but WP:DEL#REASON also gives no justification for deletion at present. --Whoosit (talk) 21:42, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.