The result was no consensus. I doubt extending the debate would result in a consensus being reached. faithless (speak) 06:23, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unencyclopaedic and (in places) poorly sourced article. If this sort of information is to be kept on Wikipedia it would be best represented by a category, however I would suggest that there is no need to list this info seperately and that a line or paragraph in each bio article would be sufficient.
This article is a series of untidy lists, each of which is so far from complete that it becomes misrepresentative, and is, in places, lacking references making it in violation of WP:PROVEIT and probably even WP:LIBEL. Dan1980 (talk | stalk) 12:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]