The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Speedy close It is too obvious that the nominator has not do research on the film at all but just been abusing the AfD process on not only the film in question, but also other articles of Korean films[1][2]; Private Eye (film) and The Naked Kitchen. The original title in Korean is provided, so he could search necessary information with it just within few seconds. 157 Korean news hits comes from Google News.[3]Caspian blue01:02, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hastened Keep per improvements made since the AfD began. And per WP:CSB request input from Korean Wikipedians in searching through the 3 million google hits [4], the 1100 news hits [5], and the 98 book hits [6]. And before anybody squawks about my just providing g-hits... I do not myself read Korean, but a film that set box office records in South Korea is notable enough foir me, and common sense would seem to indicate that even if a small percentage of those g-hits is about this film, that small percenntage would be plenty.. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 04:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
To be fair, I've had to remove the box office section as it completely misquotes the source. All it actually says for this film is "recently released Korean films are failing to attract audiences ("A Million", "Living Death" and "Yoga"). There are complaints about the lack of variety and novelty". This is no record breaking film. PC78 (talk) 11:50, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.