This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:15 (UTC)
slang term You (Talk) 00:10, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete and redirect --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 18:45 (UTC)
Neologism with no supporting references. Claimed to have been used in regard to Jeff Gannon case, but a search for ["mountain making" + Gannon] doesn't bring up any applicable sources. Questions left on the talk pages of the editor and the article haven't been answered. Willmcw 00:10, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was speedy deleted as recreation of a deleted page --cesarb 03:35, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Tagged for sppedy but not reaching any of the criteria (though it does appear to be vanity). no vote. Dunc|☺ 00:18, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Note: This is an archived version of the old vfd closed on June 24. For the new vfd, see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Edip Yuksel 2 --Ragib 5 July 2005 22:43 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was KEEP NSR 1 July 2005 11:34 (UTC)
Marked for speedy but isn't a candidate. Reason given was advertising. Seems unlikely to me that this was done by the company, more likely it was a fan. Nominator abstains from voting. — Gwalla | Talk 00:29, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:15 (UTC)
bogus information, Subandhu is Indian, article claims Arabic, zero was later than 4000BC, more like AD something, other "facts" made up GangofOne 00:47, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:16 (UTC)
"15 Seymour Street is the birthplace of the notorious serial killer James Cole. Pilgrims regularly visit." So sayeth the article. Presumably these pilgrims know what city or town the street is in, and who the mysteriously red-linked Mr. Cole is, too. Unless further facts emerge, delete. Grutness...wha? 01:14, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:16 (UTC)
This could be from some unnamed work of fiction such as a novel or film, or the anabatic perambulations of a deranged psyche. There's no indication either way at the moment, but this gets a perfect googlewhack - one hit, so my money's on it being piffle. If I'm wrong and it's from a real fictional work, then either add to it or merge with whatever it's from, otherwise drizzle this shizzle'. Grutness...wha? 01:22, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk 01:48, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
Neologism. Come back in ten years. Denni☯ 01:32, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 20:49 (UTC)
Looks, smells and feels like a POV fork. Unwieldy name, etc. Clearly a topic that should be addressed, but in the respective Dendrochronology or Creation science articles. FCYTravis 01:50, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was No consensus (split between keep and merge), so keep --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 18:58 (UTC)
not article worthy: Merge to "Weird Al" Yankovic — Fingers-of-Pyrex 01:51, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:16 (UTC)
Delete - apparent neologism. Google returns no hits. I'm also unable to find anything on John Paul the natural philosopher. Rlandmann 02:05, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 19:05 (UTC)
Added on behalf of Wetman. He/she marked this article for speedy deletion. IMO, it doesn't match any speedy criteria, so I'm adding it to VfD instead. Abstain for now. (I may come back and vote later.) — Bcat (talk | email) 02:18, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. I have also copied the text to a subpage of User:Patata3. Bratschetalk 5 pillars
This articler refer to a subject that is of merely local interest. It documents a 'game', which consists of attacking other players, played at one particular school.
(I was reluctant to nominate this since someone made a lot of edits on this, could userfy to USER:Patata3 (has no curent user page).) RJFJR 02:20, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:16 (UTC)
not encyclopedic Orioneight 02:20, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:16 (UTC)
userfy — Fingers-of-Pyrex 02:29, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was MERGE into The Incredible Machine NSR 1 July 2005 11:39 (UTC)
Non-notable. Denni☯ 03:11, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:17 (UTC)
Article makes no claim to notablility. Civil engineer turned importer. --Xcali 03:23, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:17 (UTC)
Non-notable Denni☯ 03:31, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedily redirected. -- BD2412 talk June 28, 2005 20:39 (UTC)
Another invention by the deluded mind which created John Paul (musician) Denni☯ 03:47, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 11:26 (UTC)
Was listed as a copyvio but permission was granted, however this group does not meet the music guidelines, no relasease, no significant tours, delete--nixie 03:51, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep and cleanup. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 3, 2005 00:29 (UTC)
I'm not quite sure what to do with this article. Is it necessary? I'm not an expert on dialects of English but I noticed on List of dialects of the English language that there is a section on Pidgins and Creoles but no link to Creole English. Two articles link to Creole English however: Trinidadian Creole English and Tobagonian Creole English. Both articles say that they are dialects of Creole English. Should we include this article on the List of dialects of the English language article? Please help. Thanks. ---User:Hottentot
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:17 (UTC)
None have been heard of by Google. Sure bet. Denni☯ 02:40, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
*Probable Hoax. Google results for exact phrase are dismal Same user created jipsorisen. CanadianCaesar 02:39, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:17 (UTC)
It is 1.) Just a school teacher 2.) Extremely POV i.e., "great" and "popular school below the equator" 3.) The creator typed: "This article is a useless stub." Krystyn Dominik 04:21, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 2, 2005 03:19 (UTC)
This page points to two no existing pages. It serves little or no purpose existing. harrismw 04:37, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:17 (UTC)
Too specific cultural aspect, if it exists at all. Not notable. Delete. -Poli 04:58, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedy keep, as no valid reason for deletion was given (the article is not alleged to be unencyclopedic in any way, per WP:NOT), and the nomination was one of the first acts taken by a newly-established account. Wikipedia is NPOV and therefore does not censor articles at the behest of their subject. -- BD2412 talk 08:04, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
This article is repeatedly used to disseminate secret ritual information of the Delta Tau Delta Fraternity and this is a clear violation of the national fraternity's policies towards the protections of such information. If this continues the abuse will be reported to the national fraternity
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:17 (UTC)
Article is not a copyvio, but it is band vanity, no recordings, no tours of performances of any significance. Delete--nixie 06:13, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:18 (UTC)
Neologism, slang dicdef, self reference to Wikipedia. Thue | talk 06:49, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 2, 2005 03:22 (UTC)
I quote: Jonahtan [sic] Ng ( 黄 骏 杰〕is a Singaporean student.He is also a blogger and a Wikipedia browser.Tan Ding Xiang introduced Wikipedia to him. Do I really need to elaborate? -- Hoary 07:30, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
I quote: Tan Ding Xiang,(陈鼎 翔 )born 1992,is a Singaporean student.His friends include Jonathan Ng. Do I really have to elaborate? Oh, OK: vanity. -- Hoary 07:33, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
PS Or speedy delete, to avoid unnecessary prolongation of any embarrassment for these two people, who perhaps just hadn't understood the difference between regular articles and user pages. Note that User:Tdxiang already exists. -- Hoary 13:47, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 20:52 (UTC)
Not notable. Best merged with the Arfenhouse article LBMixPro(Speak on it!) 07:57, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:18 (UTC)
Notable? Marked with a vanity-tag by User:SimonP on May 31. Abstaining. Uppland 08:38, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was moved to BJAODN. :o) - Mailer Diablo 2 July 2005 16:55 (UTC)
Unverifiable - no hits for either site on Google or Google Groups (searching for the url as a string as well). Tedious trolling/fantasy. sjorford →•← 09:01, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete - If someone wants to write a good, NPOV article on the subject, this start won't help them. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 21:01 (UTC)
Non verifiable, dubious content, possibly original research Proto 09:14, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 2, 2005 13:30 (UTC)
Oh no. This is just List of U.S. Highways minus a few. Delete. --SPUI (talk) 09:46, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:18 (UTC)
Seems to be pure vanity page. Zero hits on Google. Delete. Michael 10:45, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:18 (UTC)
Delete - this is unverified and I'm pretty sure it's a hoax. Naturenet 11:09, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Objection - Please try to read Jo Logan. User: Anonymous 12:20, 24 Jun 2005 (GMT+1) This was really posted by 62.253.219.130 (talk · contribs). This IP has a history of vandalism.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was no consensus, so keep. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 2, 2005 13:33 (UTC)
Non-notable web radio station. the wub "?/!" 11:19, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep and cleanup. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 3, 2005 02:35 (UTC)
Doesn't seem significant enough to have an autobiography on Wikipedia (see Talk:Dylan Ricci). --Cryptic (talk) 11:32, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 1 July 2005 11:24 (UTC)
promotional and non-notable delete Vtslayer 11:36, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was KEEP NSR 1 July 2005 11:30 (UTC)
No context, non-notable, delete Proto 11:42, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was KEEP NSR 1 July 2005 11:30 (UTC)
Substub without no significant content. Delete. - Mgm|(talk) 11:51, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:18 (UTC)
Vanity page. Delete. Michael 12:09, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:19 (UTC)
Apparent hoax. Google turns up nothing, ISBNs seem to be bogus.—Wahoofive (talk) 12:51, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 3, 2005 02:40 (UTC)
Vanity. Delete the pictures too. Enochlau 13:01, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:19 (UTC)
Advertisement. --Conti|✉ 13:07, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:19 (UTC)
Non-notable. Enochlau 13:16, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE — Gwalla | Talk 3 July 2005 02:16 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:19 (UTC)
Non-enciclopedic and irrelevant. Merge (merge what?) or redirect to Vodafone page. José San Martin 13:47, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was no consensus. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 21:04 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was no consensus. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 21:06 (UTC)
I created this page in the hopes that it would be useful as a kind of watchlist for pseudoscientific theories, and as a collection of curious crackpottery in the style of http://crank.net/ . I guess I was forgetting that I was creating the page on a wiki, instead it became a magnet for the kinds of people who support these theories. They would claim that the page is inherently POV, and I'm ashamed to admit that they were probably right. The other thing they have done constantly in the two years since this page was created, is add various mainstream theories to the page, in an effort push the POV that these mainstream theories are just as legitimate as whatever minority theory they support. These efforts have been largely successful, since most Wikipedians are not prepared to argue such a subjective point on such a regular basis. I have copied the page to my user space (User:Tim Starling/List of crackpot theories) and modified it to a mainstream POV, for the benefit of Wikipedians who wish to use it for monitoring crackpots. I'm now more than happy for the main namespace copy to be deleted. Tim Starling 14:12, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Count Iblis 15:58, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was merge. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 21:13 (UTC)
Merge with Cruachan, Ireland. Seems just a spelling error. --Lord Voldemort 14:45, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete and make available for rewrite. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 21:14 (UTC)
Looks like an advert for a non-notable piece of computer harware. Most of the Google hits [10] seem to be to the manufacturer's websites. Cutler 15:02, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
From author- newbie, as you can see-... I'd be more than happy to remove the link to the "further information", if that's what's got everyone upset. You should be aware, though, that I make no money from my involvement in MicroLan. I just find it a lot of fun. A lot of people DO make money from it, though, and it has been a serious technology since at least 2000. If Wikipedia wants to have no entry, so be it. In the past 48 hours, I've seen MicroLan products controlling the cash register in a major food retail chain and being used as at "watch-the-watchman" device in a shopping mall.... Hope I haven't further offended anyone by any clumsyness in this post!
--- When I searched on "1-Wire" I got no hits.... yes, I did search before presuming to post. I've used computers since 1968, so if Wikipedia's search engine misunderstands my search request, I'll be there are other people who are not seeing things that are no use to them if they don't see them. The 1-Wire page, subsequently found via link above, CERTAINLY has ad links to commercial sites benefiting from sale of the devices... not that I mind... but I wonder why the "delete it" brigade didn't attack those links?
--- If anyone wants to re-write the note to make the style more acceptable, I thought that was what wikis are all about? I hope you'll leave the INFORMNATION in place, as that was the point of putting the article in place.
--- The 1-Wire article is all well and good, and I'd be delighted if someone links my page to that, but if you were new to the technology, would you want to start with the 1-Wire dissertation, or the intro I've written?
--- I thought the article told people about 1-Wire and MicroLan... told them what it is. I presume they would only arrive at the page if they were trying to find out what they are.
Tom- original autor of page25 June 2005 11am, UK
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:19 (UTC)
Unverifiable. I've been reading about Pedro Nunes, to expand its article, and I didn't find a single reference to this. Also, I get only 6 Google hits, and they are all from WP, or mirrors of it.--Nabla 15:01, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:31 (UTC)
Advert for a website Cutler 15:10, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:20 (UTC)
Advertisement, neologism, vanity. Delete. Kelly Martin 15:12, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:20 (UTC)
Advert. See CEO go Cutler 15:15, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:20 (UTC)
Just one relative unkwown of millions of software service companies. Site doesn't have enuf traffic for an Alexa ranking, 25 displayed hits for "code 42 software", fewer for sites that contain code42.com. Niteowlneils 15:32, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:20 (UTC)
POV, original research, redundant. Jayjg (talk) 18:44, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 21:16 (UTC)
Appears to be a vanity/self-promotional page Tverbeek 15:37, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 1 July 2005 06:39 (UTC)
Neologism. Gets 22 googles. Also, do we want a list in Wikipedia of 'people occasionally called bimbos'? Radiant_>|< 15:46, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:20 (UTC)
Vanity/ non-notable band/ 29 Google hits [14]/ doesn't even tell us anything about them. Cutler 15:47, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was KEEP NSR 1 July 2005 11:24 (UTC)
Dicdef. Cutler 15:56, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:20 (UTC)
No Vote: Was listed for speedy delete with reason stated as WP is not a soapbox or a webhost. This is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. See WP:CSD. Also see WP:DP where it states problem as "Is not suitable for Wikipedia (see WP:NOT)", should be VfD. Under WP:NOT is Wikipedia is not a soapbox and not a host. I'm all for reducing VfD load, but this is not a valid candidate for speedy. --Durin 15:55, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was no consensus. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 21:18 (UTC)
Wow! 26,000 Google hits [15] ... but that's probably because (according to Babel Fish) kolven is Dutch for caggages. Golf? - unverified. Advert? - definitely. Give the article a chance just in case is does confound us all by getting expanded. Cutler 16:07, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 3, 2005 00:32 (UTC)
Just a rant to advertise a non-notable church Cutler 16:13, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 19:18 (UTC)
Appears to be someone's pet quantum gravity theory. The paper cited looks good, but has no bearing on the article's claims, making the article original research. Despite requests, no supporting documentation has been forthcoming for the article's claims about a gravitational "uncertainty principle" and claims that this "reconciles the incompatibility between general relativity and quantum mechanics".--Christopher Thomas 16:22, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
First I am not the author of the page in question I do however have a strong interest in the matter at hand.
What would it take for you to not think this is original research? A physical reviwe D-15 article specifically about the effects of the brownian motion of distant unseen objects on hypothetical measureing equipment? That is all the article refer's to, brownian motion of experimental equipment due to random gravitational waves. The article itself is almost compleatly classical in it's physics. If anything this article should be moved to a page dealing with Classical Chaos theoryinstead of quantum gravity.
--Hfarmer 08:33, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
--Hfarmer 28 June 2005 04:39 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 21:19 (UTC)
Joke page. BJAODN. --cesarb 16:26, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:21 (UTC)
nn StarCraft player. Patent vanity. I would have speedied it, but some admin probably would have complained. --Xcali 16:40, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:21 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Fairfax Youth Police Club Father's Day All Star Tournament
delete - obscure community info - police kids soccer - w'pedia is not a notice board or webhub! max rspct 16:47, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) or redirect to Nambla he he
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:21 (UTC)
Neologism coined by non-notable blogger Pburka 16:53, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was invalid nomination: previous VfD ended less than a day ago. --cesarb 21:04, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Perhaps I was not explaining enough last time. I was in HK IMO team and I saw Macau IMO team (can't remember if it was 2001 or 2002) leaving before prizing ceremony because they had to get back and prepare for the coming IOI. And I also knew that some IMO trainees in HK were in IOI training as well because of the similarity between maths and programming. This is not anything surprising for one to take part in both IMO and IOI for a city with small population like Macau and Hong Kong. And I think I should repeat myself again: the level of maths olympiad is far away from maths research, and it can't truly assess one's maths ability because maths olympiad is to solve explicitly stated problems while research is to probe into undiscovered theorems and theories. The latter often needs years of hard work, while the former only takes some hours of thinking. Therefore don't compare it with sports and don't think one will be a maths stars because of performing well in maths olympiad. I speak from my experience in maths olympiad training and in maths undergrad studies. So I ask for a delete of this article. Small potato 17:06, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:21 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, this rabbi isn't notable for any reason besides being a rabbi (which is definitely not enough). A google search produces a mere 9 results. -Frazzydee|✍ 17:11, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:21 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. If this is all that is known, then it would be better to wait until actual info is released before making the article, and that probably won't be until next year. Sonic Mew 17:15, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was ignoring sock puppets, delete. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 21:33 (UTC)
Connected with Bill Kelly, also up for deletion. This lobbying group only gets two unique Google hits [16]. --Etacar11 17:35, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Keep I'm sick of these elitist wikipedians trying to decide what is worthy to be educated of. It doesn't matter how notable something is. There's an entry to the X-Factor comic book, for goodness' sake. This movement will mean ten times as much as that piddly little long-canceled publication series and will have an important effect on the state of Michigan and thus it is something and has something of value to it and should be available to educate others with. "Notability" is an excuse. This is worthy to be learned of. With entries of all this obscure stuff, don't hate this movement just because you disagree with its values. --The Blue Spider
Nothing personal? A knife does not make a wife MR Etacar...you know what I'm talking about don't you? (unsigned comment by 218.1.140.9)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was speedily redirected. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 21:34 (UTC)
This expression is uncommon at best. (Many Google hits are just incidental combinations of the two words.) The article itself appears to be an attempt to combine elements that don't belong together. Please see Talk:News trade. A template and category for "News trade" have been previously deleted. Maurreen 17:33, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep/no consensus. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 21:47 (UTC)
A very noble effort, to cure paralysis, but the notability of this research programme (it doesn't even appear to be a faculty or institute) is doubtful. JFW | T@lk 17:38, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:21 (UTC)
Delete dicdef, already Transwiki'ed to Wiktionary, there's nothing here to write an encyclopedia article about. Russ Blau (talk) 17:47, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep but does it need to be moved to Edwin Bryant? FCYTravis 5 July 2005 21:49 (UTC)
This only concerns the bottom portion. The top part of the entry about another person is up for copyvio.
The book covered has an Amazon sales rank of ~500k. No other claims of notability made.
lots of issues | leave me a message 17:52, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 21:50 (UTC)
Tagged on Apr 30 but never listed on VfD. No vote.--Nabla 18:00, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
As the Thry guy noted on the discussion page this page should simply be listed on the Elmer Fudd page. It is not significant enough to stand on its own. freestylefrappe 03:13, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 3, 2005 15:55 (UTC)
Tagged on Jun 18 but not listed on VfD. No vote.--Nabla 18:05, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
Extreme POV topic which is extensively covered in other articles. Midster 23:55, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
Dudtz-Delete offensive twords Arabs and Muslims.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:22 (UTC)
I am renominating this for deletion after it survived last month. This appears to be a vanity entry. "Tom Chiu" paired with SPSS scores 22 Google hits, some of which are mirrors of Wikipedia content. This page mentions his title and describes a fairly typical employee role. Vanity suspected here. In the previous VFD, it appeared this entry would be voted out as a standard vanity delete, but towards the end, two editors without explanation voted keep. It would be helpful this time if all voters provided a reason for their decision. lots of issues | leave me a message 18:15, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:22 (UTC)
Article is nothing more than a vanity piece, I think it should be dropped. 24.43.203.159 18:30, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Tony Sidaway (Clone of perversion) --cesarb 21:27, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This is just a poor copy of the Perversion entry. Chris Capoccia 18:47, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:22 (UTC)
This “article” is fancruft. Chris Capoccia 15:11, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirect. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 21:53 (UTC)
This “article” looks very much like a product advertisement or vanity page Chris Capoccia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:23 (UTC)
Just another vanity page. DS 19:00, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 21:56 (UTC)
Tagged on Jun 8 but not listed on VfD. No vote--Nabla 19:23, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirected. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 21:54 (UTC)
Possibly merge with Minneapolis, Minnesota, but I'm inclined to delete as unencylopedic. --Alan Au 19:36, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:23 (UTC)
nn vanity You (Talk) 19:46, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Tony Sidaway (Boothy's vandalism) --cesarb 21:25, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Apparently someone was dissatisfied that the earlier VFD on a Roger Moss resulted in a 'keep', so he is now making a WP:POINT by creating articles on each other Roger Moss that could remotely be found by google. One of them was a published author, so that sounds encyclopedic, but there's not much notability to these four, so delete. Radiant_>|< 19:48, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. — JIP | Talk 21:46, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
ValuJet Flight 592 has a good article covering this incident and Kubeck's notability is only based on that event. This should be deleted and some portion of it perhaps merged with the VJ592 article. Delete Dbchip 19:03, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 22:02 (UTC)
nn This nomination should not be considered an implicit delete vote, I have voted seperately. You (Talk) 19:50, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 4 July 2005 14:39 (UTC)
Doesn't seem like a notable school and has no good content. Seems like school articles have been debated a lot in the past, but I feel as if there needs to be more than one line to keep it. — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 20:01, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was KEEP NSR 1 July 2005 11:20 (UTC)
This is a definition, not encyclical 24.154.28.80 20:06, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep --Allen3 talk July 2, 2005 11:32 (UTC)
Non-notable hentai video. Nothing about it particularly stands out, just the usual poorly-animated tentacle porn. — Gwalla | Talk 20:29, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was merge. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 22:04 (UTC)
Some sort of fancruft without context and with no encyclopdic value whatsoever. Martg76 20:45, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:23 (UTC)
vanity You (Talk) 20:49, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:24 (UTC)
Blatant link spam. Delete. - Mgm|(talk) 21:03, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:25 (UTC)
Claimed to be a place in Lord of the Rings, but the article is an orphan (and we have many articles on Tolkein and Middle Earth), and googling for Torania Tolkein -wikipedia, Torania Rings -wikipedia, and Torania Middle Earth -wikipedia don't get any relevant hits: only references to someone who maintained a LOTR fan website or the website itself (torania.com or torania.de, now apparently defunct). Submitter has many dubious edits. Strongly suspect hoax. — Gwalla | Talk 21:02, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:25 (UTC)
Despite being only 16, he is "one of histories [sic] greatest people, thinkers,lovers, and thinkers". Delete. — P Ingerson (talk) 21:13, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was The result of the debate was keep. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 1, 2005 12:55 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was no consensus/keep. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 22:06 (UTC)
Doesn't qualify as a stand-alone article. All these individual album entries should be deleted and merged into Todd Rundgren if anything useful can be carried over other than what's already in the article. These are simply a bunch of stubs with the occassional track list tossed in. For the most part, I don't see how they add anything which isn't on the Rundgren page already. -- Dpark 21:28, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. (Minus multiple votes) - Mailer Diablo 2 July 2005 17:08 (UTC)
well LOL but exist such a thing? Melaen 21:28, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:25 (UTC)
non existence as above Melaen 21:32, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 22:10 (UTC)
Tagged on Jun 16 but not listed on VfD. No vote.--Nabla 21:30, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
On Google, searching "Kensington Square" + "Montreal" gives 279 hits, most not pertinent. "Kensington Square" + "Montreal" + "jazz" gives 94 hits, several of which are local messageboards ("look up Kensington Square it's a Montreal jazz-rock band that's amazing they'll make it big soon") and music festivals. I am not sure what WP:MUSIC would say on this; they seem to be locally well-known, but barely under the bar of notability. I say weak delete, but could easily be persuaded otherwise. jglc | t | c 19:39, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:25 (UTC)
Page is no longer needed as it was just a way for me to experiment. I have also read that experimenting should only be done in the Sandbox. Complete and total destruction of this page! Jaberwocky6669 21:50, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:25 (UTC)
Unverifiable. Google gives zero hits for either version of his name. Scimitar 21:57, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep because of lack of consensus to delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 5 July 2005 07:40 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:25 (UTC)
shameless advertising Cutler 22:28, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:25 (UTC)
Delete not notable. I get only 45 unique Google hits. She is a Vice-president of student affairs so is a sub-top-level admininstrator (no offence!) and not an academic. Most academics get VfD'd, so I think this should too.-Splash 22:51, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Keep it...She does a lot of good..Thanks
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE — Gwalla | Talk 3 July 2005 02:51 (UTC)
delete one line dic def (already transwikied), orphan article -- pcrtalk 22:51, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 3, 2005 16:02 (UTC)
Article does not present any evidence of notability. CDC (talk) 23:25, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 5, 2005 21:05 (UTC)
I can't find any evidence that either of the Maria Angelovas described in this article are even remotely encyclopedic; the article certainly doesn't make any such claim. The fact that this is apparently encyclopedic enough for inclusion on the Esperanto wikipedia doesn't make it so here. CDC (talk) 23:29, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was KEEP. NSR 1 July 2005 11:16 (UTC)
POV essay Denni☯ 23:34, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:26 (UTC)
Another not-notable Esperanto-speaker. CDC (talk) 23:34, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:26 (UTC)
Vanity page for a graduate student at Guelph University. --Allen3 talk 23:44, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was no consensus, keep. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 22:17 (UTC)
How's this relevant? Looks like advertising or something. - Cymydog Naakka 23:52, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was no consensus, but I've gone ahead and been WP:BOLD and cleaned up the obvious cruft, bringing some sanity to the article. FCYTravis 5 July 2005 22:25 (UTC)
Someone has added back all of the non-notable content which was deleted in the previous VFD round. This is more evidence that this page is the work of one author and is of little or no use to the Wikicommunity. Perhaps this non-notable entry belongs on a Wikipedia user page instead of an article.Tanstaafl 23:50, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)