![]() |
The result was merge to Academic grading in the Philippines. MBisanz talk 00:13, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The concept of weighted averages is in use across a variety of disciplines. This article relates to a specific discipline in a specific country. It might be more useful if the incoming links are redirected to the general page Weighted mean Peaky76 (talk) 22:46, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Cowboy. (non-admin closure) Lugia2453 (talk) 22:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article may be a possible Hoax. NintendoFan (Talk, Contribs) 22:37, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Lodsys#Patents. LFaraone 13:12, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Only real source of notability appears to be that he is the patent holder for a company that is famous for patent trolling. Delete in my books. Sasquatch t|c 22:36, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect and merge to Sega Saturn. Non-admin closure. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:40, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
no reliable sources, just a blog, not notable without the sources Karl 334 Talk--Contribs 21:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Nim Vind. LFaraone 13:13, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to fail WP:GNG and author declined PROD. Uberaccount (talk) 21:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Consensus of uninvolved users is that there is insufficient significant coverage to demonstrate notability. ~ mazca talk 14:08, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I originally speedily deleted this but has been re-created with some signs that speedy no longer applies (i.e. has some reviews from local sites). However, the reviews do not seem to pass the WP:N bar for me. I would still advocate for a deletion. Sasquatch t|c 21:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. King Jakob C2 11:50, 26 April 2013 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]
Redirect to Joe Weider. Brosmer co-authored two fitness books with her husband Weider, an industry pioneer, but the media credits her with little else. Her article's other claims are dubious and sourced solely to a self-promotional website and books authored by in-laws. For example, she is credited with co-founding Shape and the International Federation of Bodybuilders, but Weider's numerous recent obituaries only credit Weider (and his brother) for this; Brosmer is generally mentioned in passing as a former model he married. Coverage dedicated solely to her is lacking, and what there is to say about her is covered succinctly in her husband's article. Mbinebri talk ← 20:45, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- In the 1950's, she was a very noted "pin-up" girl, who was as famous as many well-known actresses (at least in the United States). AnonMoos (talk) 04:13, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly significant as co-author of pioneer books about bodybuilding. More serious references need to be added, however.Zigzig20s (talk) 11:19, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to South Carolina's 1st congressional district special election, 2013. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:28, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is definitely a borderline case. He fails WP:POLITICIAN, and his notability is largely WP:INHERITED. He may pass WP:GNG, since there are multiple sources with in-depth coverage of his congressional run. But that may also mean he's notable primarily for one event. If he continues his political career, he should meet our notability standards. If he sticks to his career as a schoolteacher, he probably won't. So what do we do in the meantime? BDD (talk) 20:34, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. There's a complete lack of agreement here on the best way forward with this article, but there's definitely no consensus to delete it - the content appears useful somewhere, whether it's in the form of a transwiki, a merge, a rewrite, or a combination of these. Unfortunately this AfD has not provided a strong pointer in any particular one of those directions. ~ mazca talk 22:10, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Reads like an instruction manual (WP:NOTHOWTO). Yes, AfD is not cleanup, but this has been tagged as "essay" since 2011. Sandstein 20:25, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Yngwie Malmsteen. ~ mazca talk 22:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wife of a notable musician. Founded a record label who's only notable act is her husband. Lack of secondary sources but PROD was contested. Doesn't meet WP:N for me. Perhaps a redirect to Yngwie Malmsteen would be more appropriate? Sasquatch t|c 19:47, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed redirection to Yngwie's page would be more appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.10.247.46 (talk) 12:55, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 13:13, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable type of recursion, which, if it needs encyclopaedic treatment, should receive it as a minor subsection in an article like recurrence relation. Currently an orphan linked only from the page on Michael Somos, despite having been around for years. There are a few hundred Google Books and Scholar hits for the term; as far as I can tell, none or almost none refer to recursions of the type discussed in the article. JBL (talk) 18:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:46, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Footballer whose team is not part of a fully professional league; also a lack of independent and verifiable sources; I cannot even find him listed at the team's site. (The page was created via Articles for Creation.) Yngvadottir (talk) 18:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Consensus here is that there is insufficient significant coverage in reliable sources to demonstrate notability. ~ mazca talk 22:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article is about a liniment but has no sources that actually mention it by name. The only source refers to the IKF's allowance of certain rubbing compounds which doesn't show this product is notable.Mdtemp (talk) 18:06, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. A fair argument can be made that the article was created prematurely, but given that there is at least some shreds of information and the season will clearly be taking place in the not-too-distant future, there's no real consensus to delete it. ~ mazca talk 22:04, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article created prematurely, considering the 2012–13 season has yet to conclude. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Delete via CSD G7 (Non-admin closure). — sparklism hey! 07:46, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not yet notable per WP:MUSICBIO. No significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Captain Conundrum (talk) 17:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 13:14, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not yet notable per WP:MUSICBIO. No significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Captain Conundrum (talk) 17:25, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:48, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently non-notable social entrepreneur. No hits on Google News.
I just created this article as a move from category space, per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013_April_8#Category:Akbar_Khan_Qureshi.
However, when I then speed-read it, it seemed to be full of WP:PEACOCK phrasing ... and the assertion of notability that I had thought I had spotted in the opening sentence was misleading. It says that Quershi is "current Ambassador of India for Nations United", which I misread as the United Nations. In fact, "Nations United" is Qureshi's own venture.
The article was created by Akbarkq (talk · contribs), whose had previously created the page in article space where it was deleted as a result of a PROD. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:33, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:48, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A dusty old article about an app, with zero secondary sources, reviews, or anything - just a link to the app store. No apparent press coverage, I can only dig up a single press release. I prodded it earlier and an IP woke up to revert me, without providing any sources or improvement to the article. McGeddon (talk) 16:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Non-admin closure. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:59, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Largely unsourced, self-promotional BLP doesn't pass WP:ARTIST or GNG. Also putting up several of his related subpages for AfD. czar · · 16:00, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how this editing works, but I can see that the statement above does indeed include some wrong statements. I am a Danish journalist, critic and commentator, and I worked for Denmark's biggest weekly - Weekendavisen - from 1995 to 2012. I wrote about Thierry Geoffroy several and times, both in regard to projects in USA (MoMA PS1) and Denmark (GalleriPoulsen). Also the leading Danish newspapers POlitiken, Information and Børsen have published reviews and interviews with Thierry Geoffroy. A large number of articles on Thierry Geoffroy (and "Emergency Art"/"Emergency Room" etc) can be found in the Danish media data base Infomedia.dk (which is owned and run by most the Danish news publishing houses in collaboration) - as well as art websites and yearbooks in Denmark. Geoffroy is a household name in Denmark, people who knows about contemporary art know him - and he has even had a series of art films shown in DR2 (Denmark's National Brodcasting Company's culture and news station). Regards Nikolaj Mangurten Rubin (former surname Lassen) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.60.58.118 (talk) 20:41, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The MOMA / PS1 exhibition has been reviewed and commented by different sources that are given in this article, please check them again :
The Brian Lehrer Show Where Art and Journalism Collide : http://www.wnyc.org/shows/bl/2007/mar/06/
Format Emergency Room at MOMA / PS1 New York. Report from Reuters 2007 The art of news http://www.reuters.com/video/2007/02/27/the-art-of-news?videoId=14672
Live From N.Y., It's Yesterday's News By James Dewille Published February 21, 2007 http://www.columbiaspectator.com/2007/02/21/live-ny-its-yesterdays-newsFa bene si (talk) 11:28, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was KEEP Emergency Room (art) and MERGE the rest to Thierry Geoffroy. SpinningSpark 16:41, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable subpages (declared genres of art) of non-notable artist's practice (his AfD). Doesn't pass GNG nor have RS via Google search. Several dePROD'd by SPA. Bundling related articles for deletion:
czar · · 16:03, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
some of the artists have dedicated special chapters to ER as they seem to consider some of their works as emergency art . Here some I found for now, by googling an artist name with the word emergency art or emergency room , but there are maybe 200 artists listed if this list is updated ( http://www.emergencyrooms.org/artists.html ) 200 international artists minimum have been connected to this group , or movement ? some research have to be done in vietnamese or greek to be traced .
so far i found
Nadia Plesner with 5 main projects ( Napoli / Paris / Hanoi , Wrocalw , Copenhagen / http://www.nadiaplesner.com/emergency-room
Sophie Hjerl , on the danish art agency official page http://www.kunstdk.dk/kunstner/sophie_hjerl/vaerker/emergency-art
Guillaume Dimanche :http://www.myope.com/exhib/2009/index.html
Frank Franzen : http://www.frankfranzen.com/emergency-artworks.aspx
Amina Bech :http://www.aminabech.net/emergencyroom
David Marin :http://www.marindavid.com/worclav.php
Niels Bonde : http://nielsbonde.blogspot.dk/2013/03/emergency-room-ps1-moma.html
Toby Barnes : http://www.tobybarnesart.com/EmergencyOne.html
Peter Lind : http://peterlind.org/emergencyroom.html Fa bene si (talk) 09:15, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Melina Pena :http://penalamelina.blogspot.dk/2009/10/emergency-room-pan-pallazo-delle-arti.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dicoss (talk • contribs) 06:35, 25 April 2013 (UTC) — Dicoss (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
is it so that the danish art agency is not a reliable source ?
http://www.kunstdk.dk/kunstner/sophie_hjerl/vaerker/emergency-art
, also the name of those artist have been publishedby several institutions including MOMA / PS1 but also on recognise institution like the polish Presidency . Ministery of culture and heritage , Ministery of foreign affair ; Education and Culture ( please scroll down ) http://www.culturecongress.eu/en/event/format_emergency_room
is the publishing house Revolver not reliable ? http://www.revolver-books.de/w3NoM.php?nodeId=1084 or the institution PAN in Napoli ?http://www.comune.napoli.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/9193 or the prince of Denmark report in main danish newspaper Politiken http://politiken.dk/erhverv/ECE1464565/kronprinsen-sprang-paa-cyklen-for-klimaet/
Is the ZKM museum , Hans Belting and Peter Weibel not reliable source ?
or Weekendavisen , most serious danish weekly paper not reliable ?
or the a 20 mi program in the The Brian Lehrer Show "Where Art and Journalism Collide " dedicated to 4 Emergency Room artists http://www.wnyc.org/shows/bl/2007/mar/06/ not reliable enough
Artnet ? is not reliable either ? presenting artists like Baptiste Debombourg or John Kørner ? http://www.artnet.fr/magazine/portraits/THOMAS/EMERGENCY%20ROOM.asp
is the BBC reliable source even in vietnamese ?http://www.bbc.co.uk/vietnamese/vietnam/2011/11/111128_emergencyroom_art.shtml
Is Nadia Plesner not reliable when she made special issue of her appartenance to the group https://www.google.dk/search?q=emergency+room+nadia+plesner&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dicoss (talk • contribs) 18:55, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to be an amator wikipedia users , but I have the feeling some one erased all the names of the artists that participated in the Emergency Room communauty , how is this possible , to make history disapear ? who did that ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dicoss (talk • contribs) 19:20, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh I understand thank you to give learning , and please receive my excuses to have not been through all the wikipedia rules yet ,it is not easy for me here , but why not keep the notable one ? the sourced ones like some mentioned above ? they must be about 40 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dicoss (talk • contribs) 06:55, 26 April 2013 (UTC) you say they " were almost all not notable " , but is wikipedia not a case by case plattform ? where some get erased and eliminated , and some can remain until next judgement ? can we erase all because of "almost" as an acceptable definition ? ( in this case maybe almost is about 40 artists) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dicoss (talk • contribs) 07:00, 26 April 2013 (UTC) Which ones of "the almost " could we saved for beeing erased , is wikipedia purpose to save history like doctors try to save life ? if there is any one to save from deletion should we not try to save them ?[reply]
How did you do research , did you take name by name or just delete all artists at once in one go ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dicoss (talk • contribs) 07:08, 26 April 2013 (UTC) None of those artists name were debated just eliminated , should we not take name by name and debate if they fullfill the criteria and why and why not ? one by one . some are also from other part like Vietnam , or have reference in greek linguage etc . The Emergency Room commnauty has existed for 7 years in ,i think, 10 countries with space implantation in Museum like MOMA / PS1 or PAN Napoli or the academy of fine art in Hanoi ... some of those artist must be eligible here in wikipedia to survive elimination . at least this should be debate case by case carefuly . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dicoss (talk • contribs) 07:27, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deleted as WP:G12. There was no good version to revert to. This deletion is without prejudice to recreation in a non-promotional form and without the copyvio content. TerriersFan (talk) 18:10, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
non notable school, reads like ad author removed PROD Karl 334 Talk--Contribs 15:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:49, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is supposedly a localized event by undisclosed "organizations" and other obscure people since 2005. There is no indication that this event is notable. Google searches point to things of little credible value, such as re-iterations of the wikipedia article, blogs, or unrelated tea-tasting events. Googlebooks give no credible hits. Cold Season (talk) 15:36, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Nominator withdrawn based on improved references. Non-admin closure. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:54, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet notability criteria. Article used for advertising and promotion. It is little more than a list of clients. Rushton2010 (talk) 15:32, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by nominator: Over the last few days the article has been substantially improved and all the issues, I believe, have been addressed so that deletion is no longer needed.
Rushton2010 (talk) 15:11, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. LFaraone 13:14, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Notability is not established for this author's CV of an article, which could well be here for publicity. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:38, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 13:15, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Seems a bit too fresh to be notable. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 14:53, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:50, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NCORP. I would speedy it but it makes a somewhat reasonable claim for notability ("first online-only office...") but I can't find anything to back this up. Also reads like a bit of an advertisement or directory listing. Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 14:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
More than happy to edit the article. Not trying to advertise at all. Would you prefer I delete the contact information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeanphillips2013 (talk • contribs) 14:57, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 13:15, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
spam from Voidz. non notable individual, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. sourcing is a mix of imbd, blogs andnon reliable sources. nothing independent or substantial. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:37, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The sources are mostly all the subject's own self-published words copied from web site to web site. I cannot find any reliable secondary sources. No notable. Jojalozzo 01:46, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to The Soup Dragons. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:32, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Notability is neither claimed nor established for this little-known compilation album. The two sources just provided show existence but make no claims in its support. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:34, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 13:16, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
spam from Voidz. non notable individual, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. sourcing is a mix of a blog mention and a video a performace where he happened to be playing. nothing independent or substantial. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:29, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 13:16, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
spam from Voidz. non notable website, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. mix pr and primary duffbeerforme (talk) 13:44, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 13:15, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
spam from Voidz. non notable company, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. mix pr, primary and listings. I found nothing past run of the mill reports fort stockmarkets, no substantial independent coverage. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.theaureport.com/pub/na/10051
http://www.theaureport.com/pub/video/393 — Preceding unsigned comment added by KevinSpiro (talk • contribs) 21:31, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
*Comment: I don't feel they are stock pumping web sites as you don't pay to get coverage on them, they come to you if they feel you have a good story. But in the end it's up to you guys on the fate of this page! My relationship with the company is that I recently have been getting interested in junior mining and exploration companies, living in one of the biggest mining hubs of the world (Vancouver, BC) we're surrounding by mining companies, Howe Street is famous for it in the industry. I've started to realize that mining is extremely important as almost everything we own is a product of mining at some stage of development. I noticed that there were a number of companies that extract the minerals such as Kinross Gold, Barrick Gold, and Newmont Mining Corporation on wikipedia, but hardly any of the companies that actually find the land (exploration and development) that then gets sold to these extraction companies. I then took it upon myself to create some pages for (what I thought) were notable junior exploration companies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KevinSpiro (talk • contribs) 16:16, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
*Comment Yes, they are a client of the company I work for though I'm not creating the page for them because they're a client. I work in a field that I am passionate about and I plan on making these pages for a number of notable companies in the junior exploration and development space, regardless of if I have a work connection with that company or not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KevinSpiro (talk • contribs) 16:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
*Comment DGG, that makes sense I see the bias in the wording. I understand if this page should be deleted, alternatively I'd be more than happy to go through and change the wording to what you would see in an encyclopaedia. I can remove the financing details as well, and put in what would would see on a balance sheet instead (or just remove the section entirely) as I believe it would be much more unbiased as you can see from the table on the top right their net income is actually in the negative! I'll refrain from any sort of bias or 'promotion' in any further articles (if allowed to create them). And I'll be sure to create any additional articles though the AfC process as well. Nevertheless, thank you for your support on this topic and supporting passionate writers in wikipedia :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by KevinSpiro (talk • contribs) 20:04, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 13:16, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
spam from Voidz. non notable product, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. mix pr and primary duffbeerforme (talk) 13:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Siduri. Some merging may be done if reliably sourced. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:08, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:ORG. The church's webpage advertises the free book which is the 2nd source (and has been added to several articles as a source despite failing WP:SPS). Dougweller (talk) 13:21, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete (WP:CSD#A7) by INeverCry (talk · contribs)
Non-notable actor. A single role in a small independent film, and an unverified appearance in a local production of a play that may or may not make it to Broadway. Too soon for this bio. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:07, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
considering you haven't even seen the movie Bluebird your argument is pure speculation. You have no idea what he does, how much he does, etc. In fact he is still in the movie at the end of the film in a very poignant scene. He is also noted as CREDITED in IMDB, actors who do not play a significant role are not credited, they appear as "rest of cast" -- by your 'assumption" if he were not important he would be "rest of cast" -- considering you havent seen the movie, your argument is mute and pure speculation. Since the movie premieres tonight, not enough media attention has been given and reviews and more information will be added as it appears in the press. Per Wiki " Comments should concentrate on facts that are verifiable from reliable sources." by your 'assumption" if he were not important he would be "rest of cast" -- considering you haven't seen the movie, your argument is based on your opinion as you do not know how significant his role is, you are guessing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.74.93.235 (talk) 14:44, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Then by your argument IMDb is not credible? IMDb uses a system whereby significant roles are called "credited" any other type of role is rest of cast." You cant have one rule when it suits you then switch it when it does not facilitate your argument. This movie releases tonight, thus far all that is out there is what the publicity department has released. You are using your assumptions when you feel like it, then switching it up to something else when you point is refuted. Bottom line, you can't assume anything, citations and valid info has been provided to substantiate this page.
You say "non notable" as your argument for delietion, IMDb states otherwise, the rest is pure speculation on your part and "not wanting to be wrong."— Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.74.93.235 (talk) 14:57, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
FIne. Whatever. delete it, at the end of the day wikepedia just lost more hits from people searching for info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.74.93.235 (talk) 15:37, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 13:18, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Does not appear to be notable - searches only turn up the subject's own webpage, no sources to prove assertion of notability. hmssolent\Let's convene My patrols 12:36, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. G5 (created in violation of a block or ban), A10 (duplicate of existing article). Article created by an obvious sock of an editor indef'd for copyvio. The Bushranger One ping only 21:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced list of aircraft of the Bangladesh Air Force. Very few sources/references given, inline or other, and all reflinks I checked returned a "404". All in all it is a very unencyclopaedic list more at home on a fan forum than on WP. It is a companion to the equally unsourced Equipment of Bangladesh Army, created by the same editor. Thomas.W (talk) 12:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 13:18, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No indication of notability, quick search didn't find anything. (PROD was declined on technicality as I failed to provide a reason - either Twinkle bug or incompetence, although has been seconded by DGG - see history) Widefox; talk 12:24, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. G5 (created in violation of a block or ban), A10 (duplicate of existing article). Article created by an obvious sock of an editor indef'd for copyvio. The Bushranger One ping only 21:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced list of equipment of the Bangladesh Army. Very few sources/references given, inline or other, and the few that are listed are either dead links or lead to pages that don't support the inflated claims and numbers in the article. All in all it is a very unencyclopaedic list more at home on a fan forum than on WP. Thomas.W (talk) 12:06, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep, no delete !votes, nomination withdrawn. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No independent third-party sources - the third-party sources listed are reprints of press releases; no evidence of notability; reads like an advertisement. David Gerard (talk) 11:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
can't find any relevant coverage - tagged for notability since november 2009 nonsense ferret 19:02, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable minor league baseball player. Has been released by the Angels. Unlikely to make the show and he shows no evidence of meeting GNG. Spanneraol (talk) 16:21, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:29, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No assertion of notability – Richard BB 15:18, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:26, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely no independent coverage suggests this individual may meet the criteria set out at WP:GNG, WP:BIO and WP:ARTIST. One (very) passing mention isn't enough.
And I know autobiographies are permitted, but I cannot fail to note that this article is the only contribution of its creator, called, of course, Perianu. Perhaps he should read WP:NOTLINKEDIN. - Biruitorul Talk 14:40, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wizardman 04:11, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable minor league baseball player who is in the independent leagues and thus unlikely to make the Majors. Article also lacks sources and seems to also have conflict of interest issues. Spanneraol (talk) 13:53, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:55, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
unable to establish this as Wikipedia-notable/deserving of an article Lachlan Foley 05:15, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:55, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
unable to establish this as Wikipedia-notable/deserving of an article Lachlan Foley 05:14, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. There is no agreement on whether the sources are sufficient for notability. Per WP:DELPRO, this defaults to delete in BLP cases where the subject has requested deletion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:54, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Someone created this Wikipedia entry without my permission. I do not wish to be in Wikipedia. Period. Please remove my entry. I have no desire to be included in Wikipedia. Thank you. Marlene A. Eilers Koenig (Mrs.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marlenekoenig (talk • contribs) 03:28, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Just please remove it .. I did not ask for a Wikipedia entry. There is more information on my book jackets ...but I do not wish to be associated with this site. My students are not permitted to use Wikipedia ... and I do not wish to included. Remove me NOW. No debate. I have the right to be excluded, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marlenekoenig (talk • contribs) 17:37, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 13:19, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Advert-like article that is not supported by any clear reliable sources; currently most if not all the sources cited in the article are download links and forum posts, which obviously fail to meet WP:RS. Upon further inspection, of all the sources, only one source seems to at least scrap past the WP:RS requirements, and that is the Softpedia review. YuMaNuMa Contrib 10:57, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 03:33, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this article indeed survives in this abysmal shape since 2006. I cannot find anything that would establish notability per WP:CORP, no coverage at all. --FoxyOrange (talk) 13:32, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete, criteria G11 (Unambiguous advertising or promotion) and A7 (No indication of importance). JamesBWatson (talk) 10:35, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
spam from Voidz. non notable company, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. mix of non mentions, pr and non reliable sources. I found nothing better. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:53, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
spam from Voidz. non notable producer, lacks multiple significant roles in notable productions, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. mix of pr and non reliable sources. I found nothing better. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete: about as blatant an advertisement as I have seen in Wikipedia for quite a while. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:40, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
spam from Voidz. non notable company, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. mix of pr and non reliable sources. I found nothing better. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:23, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:53, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
spam from Voidz. non notable rapper/footballer. awards are not major. football team is a Dubai Amateur League team from Middlesex University. rap career is a pair of mixtapes lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. mix of shop, pr and non reliable sources. I found nothing better. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Manila. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:05, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Consistency with reasoning in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puerto Galera Yacht Club Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 07:55, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Userfied as per below. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 16:51, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The subject barely meets the notability guidelines for musicians and a large portion of the article appears to simply promote him. Most of the sources cited confirms his existence but they fail to mention why he is notable from an independent point of view. He's had 1 album reach 70th on the charts, however that was 11 years ago. YuMaNuMa Contrib 07:21, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete: CSD G7 "Author requests deletion".
Non-notable professor, completely unsourced. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 07:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to The Cure discography. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:32, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
unable to establish as Wikipedia-notable/deserving of an article Lachlan Foley 06:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:54, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. LFaraone 13:19, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A dedicated article on this is not justified. It's just cleaning, that is done on roof and it is NOT something extensive enough to warrant an article. The article consists of self-explanatory things supported with news reports so that article can exist to support questionable external links and citations. Cantaloupe2 (talk) 02:41, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:56, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
He fails Wikipedia:Notability. Has not played one game professionally. Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 02:24, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:56, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not finding substantial coverage of this band in reliable sources (WP:GNG). Mostly blogs, announcements, and show dates, which doesn't do much for WP:BAND, either. JFHJr (㊟) 01:26, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:55, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't meet WP:NFILMS or WP:GNG - seems to be WP:TOOSOON Boleyn (talk) 07:12, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 13:20, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am unable to find any reference to this society on the Trinity College website or on Google generally. Search for "Medusa Society"+Trinity comes up with one relevant result, mentioning that someone was a member. The books that are used as sources are of mainly local interest, which casts doubt on this organization's notability. Proposed deletion contested. ... discospinster talk 13:15, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Art_Olivier#Operation_Terror. Lankiveil (speak to me) 08:49, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have searched for reliable sources on this film and I have found no significant discussion of the film. Coverage seems limited almost entirely to official sources or blogs, usually conspiracist blogs The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 21:31, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 08:48, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable software product which fails WP:NOTABILITY. Article was created by an WP:SPA advertising-only account as a part of a long history of Spam and promotion on Wikipedia. see Spam Case. Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article.
I am also nominating the following related Spam campaign page:
Hu12 (talk) 00:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. As blatant promotion — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:58, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
BLP. No clear notability. Badly formatted and written. Reads like an advertisement. Also appears to be written by the individual. Kumioko (talk) 00:54, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 05:34, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Rejected PROD. However the concerns have not been addressed by the bombardment of references - this driver fails both WP:NSPORT and WP:NMOTORSPORT, and I don't believe he passes WP:GNG either. The claim of being 'CASCAR Rookie of the Year' leaves out the fact that it was the CASCAR Western Series a regional, not-fully-professional series, not the CASCAR Super Series (which would pass WP:NMOTORSPORT), and thus he doesn't pass the sporting notability requirements; looking at the references that were added when the PROD tag was removed, one was a complete duplicate of another, and two more were merely name-drops, which I have removed; of the remaining references, 1 is a name-drop, 2 appears to be a primary source, 3 is a discussion board profile(!), 4 is a wiki, and 5 was summarily rejected at RSN. None of the external links establish notability either. Googling turns up no reliable sources; gNews only turns up a name-drop, while gBooks is zilch. Conclusion: WP:TOOSOON at best. The Bushranger One ping only 00:19, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 08:47, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Its utter nonsense, has no GNIS entry in Fulton and the External links were a Sesame Street locatorm with Grover pointing to nowhere and a 380 page soil survey with NO word, Fudge in it Coal town guy (talk) 00:31, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It does not read well, and makes no effort to ascertain any notability. Jamesx12345 (talk) 18:06, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:04, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sajad H Hamdani is [[WP:PERMAORPHAN|Permanent WP:Orphan since January 2011. Terribly written article, although typical of the vanity gumpf that seems to be written by Indians in Wikipedia, remove that and it's "he's an artist" and teacher at the Institute of Music and Fine Arts, Srinagar which itself has no article, and the references are all rubbish too. Barney the barney barney (talk) 13:26, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]