The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by the nominator in face of the sources provided. (non-admin closure) Mhhossein ^talk 12:21, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lotte Chilsung (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A WP:BEFORE does not turn up any sources that appear to pass NCORP. ––FormalDude (talk) 00:06, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Edit: Nomination withdrawn in light of sources provided by Mikeblas below. ––FormalDude (talk) 03:36, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Business, and South Korea. ––FormalDude (talk) 00:06, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Keep. Lotte Chilsung, which is a division of Lotte, a gigantic conglomerate -- 60,000 employees . Lotte Chilsung is traded on a world market, so it meets WP:NCORP. More sources are already in the Korean wiki: https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EB%A1%AF%EB%8D%B0%EA%B7%B8%EB%A3%B9, https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EB%A1%AF%EB%8D%B0%EC%B9%A0%EC%84%B1%EC%9D%8C%EB%A3%8C . -- Mikeblas (talk) 00:22, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  NCORP is not met by simply being traded on a world market–there are 60 major stock exchanges around the world combining for a total of more than 630,000 companies. Looking at the translations of the sources in the Korean wiki article, some of them are not even about the company, and I don't see any that meet the strict requirements of WP:ORGIND. Can you point to the three best sources please? ––FormalDude (talk) 00:36, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • About trying to take over Pepsi bottling, plus their involvement in the bottle water market. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] -- Mikeblas (talk) 16:41, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - the article needs some work and more sources, but the company is clearly notable. PopoDameron (talk) 00:26, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relist as I see no consensus right now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:17, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.