The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. JForget 23:28, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Max Bollinger

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod was contested, so I'm bringing this here. Minor roles in TV movies, audiobooks... this man is just not notable. POKERdance ^talk/contribs 17:36, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are book titles and many other numerous entries. A lot of reference exist to this performer / writer on wikepedia already, but no simple article to record existence of this name —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdsabooks (talk • contribs) 17:39, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Book titles? Well, he fails WP:AUTHOR as well. He has not had a major role in any significant production, and until he has, he is not worthy of an article here. POKERdance ^talk/contribs 17:44, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

delete wiki-ised IMDB entry. Artw (talk) 17:41, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This sounds like a waste of time.

I will leave this to someone else. Never going to use this as a source of info either.

Does not make any sense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdsabooks (talk • contribs)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk) · @813 · 18:30, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Has had roles in major stuff, however not major roles, per WP:ENT. Triplestop x3 18:32, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep, since the extra added parts show more notability. Triplestop x3 01:21, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've flagged this for rescue; I've spent a bit of time looking for sources, with little success; I flagged it because I wonder if other sources might show the credits and things. At this stage though, I think it's unlikely. Chzz ► 18:41, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep After doing research on Max as an author, it seems he may have more note as an author than as an actor... taking advantage of his multiple language skills. Time to look and see if his books have received favorable reviews. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 00:06, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. —MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 00:36, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. —MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 00:38, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. —MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 00:40, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 00:41, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete (pending outcome of rescue attempt). An extensive list of productions and books he's been involved in, but I can't pin down any particular roles of significance, nor can I find anything on GNews. But if someone finds something I didn't I'll look again. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 07:58, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Voice actor should be treated as regular actors are. This person has been a key part in many notable series, and therefore is notable enough to have his own article. Dream Focus 00:22, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - a reasonably notable voice actor - especially for documentaries. Needs more cites. Bearian (talk) 21:27, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:58, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've gotta say Delete. I honestly can't see much evidence of notability. Irbisgreif (talk) 23:43, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Can someone close this already? It's almost been two weeks. POKERdance ^talk/contribs 19:48, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.