The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. This is far from blatant advertising. There were spam links, but I have now removed them. The page is completely unreferenced, and I have tagged it as such. This page needs a lot of attention, including referencing and clean-up, but it is not blatant advertising. —gorgan_almighty13:06, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's nothing special or notable with such sites to deserve an article and the text is pretty uninformative - models have websites, suprise, suprise. Pavel Vozenilek00:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.