The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — The Earwig @ 02:03, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Homes Match

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advert-like article about a website that does not establish notability; refs are all primary. Speedy tag removed by an anon ip, but speedy deletable as either spam or a non-notable website. I42 (talk) 23:58, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete and Close. The speedy tag should be readded in this case as well as the closing of this case. The-Giant-Andrew (talk) 00:02, 27 October 2009 (UTC)User is a recreation of banned user, so this !vote is invalid --ThaddeusB (talk) 01:34, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No secondary sources found. All Ghits are primary, press releases, advertisements, or social networking sites. Notability not established. Snottywong (talk) 00:21, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, unambiguous advertising: New Homes Match's goal is to educate people by eliminating the transparency between buyers and sellers so they can discover the buyers true purchasing power. "New Homes Match creates a place for anyone to come to find exactly what they are looking for and can match anyone up with the perfect builder for their specific desires." In cases as blatant as this, notability issues are a distractiom. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:41, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.