The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. Other than primary sources, non-notable blog reviews, and merchant sites, there's absolutely nothing out there to show that this guy has notability. (Plus the article is such a wreck that even if there were sources, it'd have to be almost completely re-written.)Tokyogirl79 (talk) 16:15, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think your suggestion sounds practical, then this can be deleted. The content will need to be fairly severely pruned (sorry - edited) and some decent references added. NealeFamily (talk) 08:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and then make a redirects to the article on the brothers. The material here is so improper that it should not stand in a visible article history. (I would, in fact, be prepared to speedy it under Do No Harm, if any other admin agrees). DGG ( talk ) 20:05, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.