The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Phir Subah Hogi. (Wikipedia:Non-admin closure) §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:02, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Phir Subha Hogi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason Jay.99.smart (talk) 12:02, 29 April 2012 (UTC) The correct page for this movie exists which is 'Phir_Subah_Hogi'[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 April 29. Snotbot  t • c »  12:23, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ALT: (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hindi: (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Keep A 54-year-old, long pre-internet, Hindi film,[1] with Indian notables Raj Kapoor, Mala Sinha, Rehman, Mubarak, Leela Chitnis, Nana Palsikar, Jagdish Sethi, Tun Tun, and Kamal Kapoor. The film was noteworthy enough back in 1958 [2] to have made it into the enduring record,[3][4][5] and we do not expecting ongoing and continued coverage six decades after a film was released, we can protect the cinematic history of India. Sources are available, both in English and in Hindi. The stub and Wikipedia will benefit from expansion... not by deletion. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:46, 29 April 2012 (UTC) (Changed to delete and redirect. See below)[reply]
  • This was nominated for deletion because the article already exists at Phir Subah Hogi. This AfD should just be closed and the article should be redirected. SL93 (talk) 22:18, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ahhh... the correct titled article is newer that the mis-titled one, but has more content and context. Changing to delete and redirect. See below. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:18, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Phir Subah Hogi. Speedy Delete. While this is the older article, it is in far poorer shape than the newer one which was created under the correct title.[6] As it is the older, an A10 speedy does not quite apply, however the G6 techincal deletion does apply, IE: "...also includes pages unambiguously created in error and/or in the incorrect namespace". Had the author of the new been aware of the old, he might have expanded it and then done a move to the correct name. As I noted above, both slightly different name spellings for this one film are sourcable, so I opt for setting a redirect to prevent unneccessary recreations of an existing article. As I have opined at this AFD, I really should not be the one to perform the close. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:18, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.