The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is wide agreement here that the topic does not meet Wikipedia's standards for an article. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:52, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Photo File

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable organization that fails to meet WP:NCORP as WP:SIRS isn’t established anywhere. The corporation lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources and a before search turns up nothing cogent. The existing sources in the articles do not establish notability. Celestina007 (talk) 21:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, lacks WP:SIGCOV. Waddles 🗩 🖉 20:37, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I didn't find anything significant other than press releases. MarioGom (talk) 18:05, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Since the previous votes, multiple independent sources have been added to the article, including newspapers with no affiliation to the Company. --Drmccann (talk) 19:24, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:ORGIND requires both "Independent Content" and what you said. The Independent Content is missing from those references.
Delete none of the references meet NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:50, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.