The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 09:45, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pornstar (film)

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The previous nomination of this page ended as "no consensus", the closing admin commenting that without improvement they would expect to see the article back at AfD. In the months since the nomination the article has not been improved ([1]) and at this point it seems that beyond not meeting the notability guideline for future films there does not even appear to be enough information about the film to create a verifiable and accurate article. For example, the article currently starts "Pornstar is a 2008 feature film" (emphasis added), this is already inaccurate, the film was not released in 2008 and has not been released so far in 2009. Currently I can find no reliable, independent sources which state when or whether it will be released. The guideline for future films states that "films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines.". The film has not been released in theatres or on video and it does not appear to have received the significant coverage by reliable, independent sources as required by the general notability guideline. The official website linked on the page doesn't even exist anymore ([2]) and to be honest I think this is a good example of why there is a notability guideline for unreleased films, as it says "there is no "sure thing" production". Wikipedia is not IMDb. Guest9999 (talk) 21:43, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:55, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the well-articulated nomination, and also per the outcome of the previous AfD. Them From Space 01:21, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the thorough nomination. In short, no RS -> no article. Bfigura ^(talk) 02:50, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although I made the point to keep it in the first nomination, it is clear that the film is going nowhere at this point. Xenocide^Talk^|^{Contributions} 01:32, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.