The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. NawlinWiki 19:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Preston holder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

No notability stated, no sources Fcsuper 04:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP Preston Holder is notable for his archeological studies. I have searched and added references. Mosura 13:51, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep because it's well-referenced. I'm still not sure about his importance to archaeology, but I'll cite the adage, "when in doubt, don't delete." YechielMan 22:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• 'Keep I have added two additional references; 2 of the total are references describing this work generally. I have not yet been able to find any additional biographical details. WebofScience shows that he continued writing book reviews into the 1960s, but these are relatively unimportant publications, so I did not add them. DGG

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.