The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Neil (►) 11:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pro-Hunter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

The newbie article creator gave a valid reason to contest speedy deletion, but I'm not convinced that the article is up to standard yet. The reference provided is insufficient, and the notability is unclear. You may wish to read the article writer's comment at Talk:Pro-Hunter. If the article is deleted, please also delete the associated image and redirects. YechielMan 17:39, 20 May 2007 (UTC) YechielMan 17:39, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I would also add that in most watch circles in england, this watch is known about. Search for "pro-hunter submariner" in google and you will find the watch is subject to several forum discussions, and it seems that people either Love it or Hate it. I also read that this watch was part of a charity auction lot (watch + plus a weekend shooting holiday) hosted by "Absolute Return for Kids" and sold for a six figure amount. Audit123
  • Comment. Forums are not reliable sources. Also, if the watch was the subject of an auction, then that might mean that the auction is notable -- it doesn't necessarily mean the watch is. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 17:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Watch. Herostratus 20:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Watch. Herostratus 11:58, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 13:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Insufficient sources to prove notability beyond just being a modified Rolex. DarkAudit 15:04, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:V, no reliable sources. /Blaxthos 17:26, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.