The result was delete. No arguments to keep Kevin (talk) 05:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Contested proposed deletion. This article about a business making non-consumer software is first and foremost unambiguous advertising. The article contains little information other than a feature list, and shilling telling you how this helps you make money and is a great investment opportunity to boot. For instance:
Notability for this business may also be dubious, but given the obvious promotional tone this is a side issue. The Computerworld pieces cited are either not chiefly about this business[1], or would appear to be based on press releases announcing a change in business models.[2] They are all from computing and IT trade publications, and don't suggest that this package is on its way to becoming a household name. But even if this software or business could support an article, this text is not that article. Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 12:06, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]