The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 17:20, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Qonto (neobank) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:SIRS. scope_creep^Talk 11:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Organizations, and France. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 13:25, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom fails WP:NCORP and promotional in tone. Theroadislong (talk) 20:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as coverage exists but it is in French and behind paywall. This article in Les Echos notes that it is valued at 4.4 billion euros, i.e. unicorn (finance) - a good indicator that we can uncover good amount of coverage if any of us do a proper WP:BEFORE.

I understand this is a case of WP:TNT but there is a well-written article about this topic on French Wikipedia, fr:Qonto. Why not just translate? We know that French Wikipedia's notability criteria is very tough and requires "at least two independent and reliable secondary sources, in national or international publications, spaced at least two years apart and centered on the subject". I don't know if copying all the references from French Wikipedia here is a good idea or not. In any case, it is an obvious keep. 2A05:87C7:9008:2C00:A839:6080:4248:D58B (talk) 21:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: no indication of importance and nearly no encyclopedic information in the article. Just a vague description as French online payment institution for freelancers and SMEs. Undescribed product (A vague description of it has been removed because it was promotional.) and a list of amounts of money raised. Janhrach (talk) 21:23, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I was going to do a source analysis but I see not a single reference in the article passes WP:SIRS. Not one. WP:THREE is the consensus based best-practice for proving an article is notable. If there is references, now is the time to prove it. scope_creep^Talk 12:22, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.