The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Qualicum Flight Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to pass the notability guidelines, no reliable sources, no news hits. Also, reads a bit like an advertisement, and there are some close paraphrasing issues between it and [1]. Monty₈₄₅ 23:06, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete per WP:CSD category A7 - no assertion of importance or significance - and probably G11 as well. This is just one of thousands of itty-bitty flying schools around the world flying a few ityy-bitty aircraft, in this case four Cessnas built in the 1970s. There have been other articles about flying schools like this; they don't survive the deletion discussions. YSSYguy (talk)
• Delete for a lack of notability, claimed or sourced. Not quite speedy material, but awfully close. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 17:32, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.