The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 01:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Raccoo-oo-oon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Orphan article about band that doesn't seem to have released anything on a notable label, mostly cassettes and such. Geschichte (talk) 09:56, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm ... not sure what the 2.4 million google hits has to do w/the delete vote ...--Epeefleche (talk) 07:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to me that Racepacket would rather delete, but the 2.4M hits make it a weak case --Glantrischmozzle (talk) 09:22, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's 220,000 when you exclude Wikipedia. Google's estimates are very buggy. • Anakin (talk) 05:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.