The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.—Quarl(talk) 2006-12-30 05:20Z
This "article" is a "sandbox" -- a test/organizational area -- that has been allowed to exist as a free-standing entry. There are obvious issues of balance, plus the ethical issues connected to the continued existence of a hidden, unanswered collection of criticisms of Robert Spencer, about whom a larger, public Wikipedia article exists. Dy-no-miite05:26, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Why? He's not meant to be editing his own article, anyway, per WP:COI. He's certainly not meant to decide whether criticism of him and his works should be included in Wikipedia, or not. LeaHazel : talk : contribs18:36, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.