The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Sources added. PeaceNT 15:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rosalita (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Band appears to be of fringe notability The Evil Spartan 18:13, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• delete. The article fails to establish that this band is notable per WP:BAND. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 18:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• comment. I have added detail and references to help support the notability of the band. Dannytrain 08:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sr13 06:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep. There is enough there, just, as far as I can see. J Milburn 09:44, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep, just about scrapes through notability. The Rambling Man 10:28, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above users; notability is asserted by means of references added by User:Dannytrain. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 19:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep the references to the competition entry and placement in a national compertition "The Road to V" is enough, as the band is due to appear on channel four and this will generate significant intrest and hits on reference. User:Adrianfrost. 00:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.