- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:20, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Sanjeev Walia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Very clearly fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG. Meeanaya (talk) 08:23, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:35, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:35, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The notability test for a mayor is not just the ability to offer technical verification that he exists, by citing a directory entry and the routinely expected reportage of municipal election results — no matter how big the place he's mayor of may be, the notability test for all mayors is always still the ability to write and reliably source some genuinely substantive content about their political impact as mayor. Even in North America, a mayor would still not get an automatic presumption of notability just because a one-line statement that he exists, the end, could technically be referenced to routine verification of the vote totals: the notability test would still hinge on how much substance we could write about his mayoralty. Bearcat (talk) 15:52, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - agree with nom MaskedSinger (talk) 17:22, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.