The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep - The article needs tidying up alot but notability is there. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010(talk) 07:48, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seb Webber (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article that fails WP:ANYBIO. Johny 547 (talk) 09:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Being on a list of 30 people isn't a "well-known and significant award or honor". Neither does a government company listing demonstrate that this company has any note (or indeed if it is the same Seb Webber). The only question is whether the snippets of news/photo interviews are significant enough for WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 12:29, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I listened and reacted. You see "30under30" as non-significant, but accept that he may pass under WP:GNG. I'll respect that, but note that Billboard in the music world is not an also-ran publication, and nor do they publish 30under30 more than once a year - plus how many Brits get on it? Secondly re CrowdSurge, that "government listing" paperwork (fully court authorised in the UK, so a highly reliable source) shows up Benjamin Bronfman as a second stage investor. Thirdly I added two extra refs re CrowdSurge and TicketMaster, and then an FT ref re Blavatnik's buy in (latter pretty short, but there). Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 14:17, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.