The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:06, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Singer 2018

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CRYSTAL, fails WP:GNG and WP:RS The Banner talk 21:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is a reliable sources. And these programme will record on December of 2017.特克斯特 (talk) 07:40, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources should also be independent sources, not sources provided by Facebook or the production company/future broadcaster. The Banner talk 16:13, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@The Banner:@Boing! said Zebedee:These are the reliable sources. Singer 2018 and Singer 2018(2). The director and the news said it will broadcast and it had already in preparation since June. 特克斯特 (talk) 17:12, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No independent, reliable sourcing. The Banner talk 14:23, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

not sources provided by Facebook or the production company/future broadcaster You see again, it these sources provide by Facebook or the production company/future broadcaster? 特克斯特 (talk) 15:45, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your own source (through Google Translation):"Singer" director Hong Tao interview: the second quarter has been in preparation and Recently, the "singer" director Hong Tao in Hunan Satellite TV news network interview, said "Singer 2" has been in preparation.. So no independent source, as that director is clearly involved in the program. Please, read WP:RS. The Banner talk 15:57, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You mean that the director cannot involved in the program? If he is not involved in the program, then it is not a reliable sources. And this news Sina have reported to the audience it will held it.(I have given the link)特克斯特 (talk) 16:10, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, the interview with the director (or any other employee involved in the program) is not an independent source and because of that not a source conform WP:RS. The Banner talk 18:57, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If in your says, Singer2017 this page also should be deleted? The sources also involed the employees.特克斯特 (talk) 04:24, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

keep just an other fanatic deletion mission from The Banner178.197.231.36 (talk) 14:38, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FFA P-16 The Banner talk 19:28, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:TOOSOON it's not too soon to have this article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 15:48, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There are enough sources and notability for the article. -- Dane ^talk 20:03, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I still think that it should be kept, many Chinese mainland people are attention in this TV program. The notability is enough for this program特克斯特 (talk) 10:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If WP:TOOSOON is a concern this article can be moved to draft for a few months, but eventually it will be moved back to mainspace. The previous 5 seasons have been huge in China and to some extent throughout East/Southeast Asia especially in the Sinophone world. Timmyshin (talk) 12:10, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.