The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Skip intro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable website. Claims that it appears on other websites, but the coverage is trivial - just a brief mention that it exists and that it is a parody of flash intros. No Alexa rank. Previously speedily deleted as Skipintro. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 07:41, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete. Mentioned, even praised, in some reliable sources, but all of them are barely a sentence long. To the extent that this may in fact be notable, there isn't actually much to say about it. --Dhartung | Talk 07:51, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Searching for such a term is rather difficult, and I am seeing nothing suggesting it should be kept. Happy to change my mind. J Milburn 09:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable and unverifiable. Precedent suggests it should be speedily deleted. CloudNine 09:31, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This just isn't notable (or verifiable). /Blaxthos 17:35, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! -- Mailer Diablo 02:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.