The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kubigula (talk) 02:26, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Steven A Williams

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced biography (except primary sources) that has been tagged for almost two years. Looked and didn't find anything except primary sources and a couple of listings in unreliable sources. Does not appear to meet the criteria under general notability. Appears to have been started two years ago an an autobiography. Dennis Brown (talk) 19:32, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the article uses non-primary sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:37, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Like this broken one? Or IMDB? The one that isn't broken, IMDB or owned by the subject of the article isn't independent or reliable via WP:RS. www.stevewilliams.org.uk for example, is obviously owned by him. Dennis Brown (talk) 01:13, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Correction That link isn't broke, it does't exist. Searching the website doesn't bring up a single mention of him. So we have primary sources and IMDB. NO independent sourcing at all. Dennis Brown (talk) 13:56, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 06:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Stinks of spam, barely escapes a G11 by the skin of its teeth. HangingCurve^{Swing for the fence} 02:32, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, causa sui (talk) 20:56, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sources are nothing like enough to meet WP:GNG for the reasons mentioned above and I'm not seeing anything to suggest that he meets any of the additional criteria at WP:BIO either. Alzarian16 (talk) 21:35, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.