The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 00:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Swati Patankar

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable scientist. See also Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Molecular_and_Cell_Biology#Swati_Patankar --Dweller (talk) 09:34, 15 January 2016 (UTC) Dweller (talk) 09:34, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 10:03, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 10:03, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. Citation counts on Google scholar are respectable but not quite enough to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF#C1 in the absence of anything else. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:30, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:04, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Redirect as suggested. Simplest solution. DGG ( talk ) 19:09, 29 January 2016 (UTC)~~ (this comment was accidentally pasted here; it was meant for a different discussion). DGG ( talk ) 17:36, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The two most highly cited papers are from when she wa a postdoctoral fellow in a very notable laboratory; no major work since then. DGG ( talk ) 17:38, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as this is questionable for the applicable notability, delete for now. SwisterTwister talk 18:02, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.