The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:05, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thick Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

According to the label's own website: "Eerily Quiet Since 2007. We had a good run." Would appear to fail any or all of WP:NMUSIC, WP:CORPDEPTH and so on. Like it or not, for entities established established in the mid-1990s and onwards, WP:GNG amounts to a kind of internet beauty contest, and this otherwise handsome candidate appears have missed the reliable sources pageant. As always, please do prove me wrong. Pete AU aka Shirt58 (talk) 09:37, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:43, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:43, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:43, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.