The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:57, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tin roof pie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cake that does not pass WP:GNG. Only reference is a recipe and WP:BEFORE check yielded no sources that show WP:SIGCOV for this ice cream cake. BaduFerreira (talk) 21:50, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. BaduFerreira (talk) 21:50, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Seems to fall under WP:NOTDICTIONARY as it merely provides definitions without substantial encyclopedic content. Secondly, it acts as a guide or how-to, which goes against WP:NOTHOW and WP:NOTDATABASE. Prof.PMarini (talk) 21:38, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per nom. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:18, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- a single source constitutes WP:OR. Bearian (talk) 23:26, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.