The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 00:04, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Transparent Language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable language learning software. The article cites only the company's own website as source, and a search nets a product review in PCMag, various blog sites and the like, and that's about it; couldn't come up with a single RS sigcov references. Fails WP:GNG / WP:PROD. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:54, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:54, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:54, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:54, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:54, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:54, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:54, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Almost all sources are WP:SPIP. There's barely any neutral coverage of this software at all (besides a single PCMag review). Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:07, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. I did find a PCMAG review: [1]. Not seeing any other reliable reviews, however. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:24, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.