The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G4 repost of material deleted at AfD JohnCD (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

University College London Conservative Society

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

removed PROD per WP:PROD. Rationale for PROD (by User:RiRiFir3 was "Unneeded page for Wikipedia, with various mistakes, falsities and unreferenced or poorly cited claims" Illia Connell (talk) 03:16, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I feel that there should be reliable sources regarding this entity, but there aren't. dci | TALK 03:24, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There have been two past AfD decisions on this, both for deletion, the most recent being in April 2011. User talk:Tarzan1986 carries the AfD notice for both that version (and that user participated in the discussion) and this version, created in December 2011, so the article contributor is aware of the community consensus for deletion. Given that this version appears to have the same problems as its predecessor, it appears a waste of time to replay an AfD discussion. Is there any reason not to proceed with a CSD G4 deletion - and WP:SALT? AllyD (talk) 09:15, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.