The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 00:44, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

VINAS Businesses

[edit]
VINAS Businesses (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, failing WP:NORG. The article started a little spammy, but Drmies fixed the worst. Looking at the author's profile, there are also some COI concerns. The references are not sufficient to establish notability. They appear blogs, routine corporate announcements, most likely based on PR (they all use near identical wording). Little if nothing of independent editorial coverage. Not much to be found either. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 23:46, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 23:46, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 23:46, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:03, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.