The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not seeing the immediate need for SALT as the article has not been repeatedly recreated (last deletion was six years ago). czar 18:05, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vidya Yeravdekar[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think anything good has changed since the last AfD. I tried to search online but couldn't find anything that helps substantially. The subject doesn't meet GNG, and it doesn't meet WP:NACADEMIC either. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 15:16, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Women, and India. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 15:16, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --Vaco98 (talk) 15:47, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt. Citation record not remotely enough for WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:40, 9 July 2022 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Doesn't meet WP:NPROF, and not convinced meets WP:NAUTHOR either. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:49, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails both WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG Kazanstyle (talk) 13:14, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I read the last afd, same logic still applies. KSAWikipedian (talk) 00:28, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Deletefails WP:PROF and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:33, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.