The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak Keep Not much seems to have changed since the last AfD, and it was on the border of notable then, but not much seems to have changed since the last AfD, and the result of that was Keep. I don't expect anything to change here except perhaps a discussion on bias towards fellow wikis. Many of them are notable, although there are a few(such as Wiki Gonzalez), that are mostly jibberish in Wiki software. Karmafist02:20, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The previous AfD shows that it is: a) spam and b) hardly notable. If it were to become notable, fine, but as it is the founder is on record as saying he put the article there so he could advertise in other articles. Not a good idea, IMO. Sunray03:01, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.