August 26

[edit]

Multiiple CC BY-SA licenses categories

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Rename to match parent and siblings in Category:Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike files. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 17:52, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can we use a range in the title instead (1.0–2.5, 1.0–3.0, 1.0–4.0)? Gonnym (talk) 19:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have a slight preference for explicitly listing each license – mostly due to the awkwardness of version 2.5 – but I would not lose sleep over a range. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 19:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Political parties of minorities in Canada

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: In Canada indigenous people are not classified as minorities source Moxy🍁 19:00, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Responses to Bearcat's points/alternative proposals would be appreciated!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 01:28, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. Since the parent category is Category:Political parties of minorities by country, rolling up to Category:Political parties of minorities, this has to stay in phase with that — so there would have to be a new batch rename of that entire tree to "political parties of ethnic groups" across the board, and this can't be renamed in isolation. Bearcat (talk) 12:22, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • As I suggested above, we could easily split off the indigenous parties here to a separate new category for indigenous parties, while leaving the non-indigenous parties in the existing category. Bearcat (talk) 16:17, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on Queen of Heart's proposal?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 17:20, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Split per Queen of Hearts. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 20:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sportspeople by Canadian province or territory and sport

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: per previous precedents. Moved to full Cfd. Omnis Scientia (talk) 12:36, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Which province or territory? What country? Can a Canadian player play in a Baseball team in the Northern Territory? This creates a problem that the previous naming convention did not have. Gonnym (talk) 13:54, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any issue or confusion here. Its for categorizing by birth place or place where they grew up, not where they played. Majority of categories are named like this. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:26, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 15:02, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Omnis Scientia: you stated at CFDS that Many recent precedents have changed that and its now supposed to be "Foo sportspeople by region". Please would you link to some of these recent precedents? – Fayenatic London 10:54, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fayenatic london. Off the top of my head, here are a few recent Cfds that I remember: this, this, and this. There are a few others as well but I can't remember when and what they were about. Omnis Scientia (talk) 11:29, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also that is how Category:American sportspeople by state is titled. Omnis Scientia (talk) 11:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fayenatic london, you never responded to this. Just a reminder. Omnis Scientia (talk) 23:03, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: After a month, we simply need more participation to achieve consensus here. People who support a wider discussion: Do you support this nomination as a first step, or do you oppose addressing one sub-tree without addressing the entire tree? People in support of renaming, do you agree with Fayenatic london's most recent suggestion for an alt rename of Category:Sportspeople by Canadian province or territory and sport?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 17:06, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cooperative video games by platform

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining trivial intersection between genre and platform. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not all games added to every category - because of course I do not know all games. But it hundreds of games, especially for Windows. Vitaly Zdanevich (talk) 04:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
> Non-defining trivial intersection between genre and platform
I disagree - "genre" and platform are not trivial. Vitaly Zdanevich (talk) 04:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
QuantumFoam66 (talk) 22:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Office and Professional Employees International Union

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Delete; only one article about the subject itself. Merge "leaders" category which has only three articles. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the leaders category but into Category:Office and Professional Employees International Union. Keep the head category.--User:Namiba 15:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The Clarion-Ledger people

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Category with just one entry. Lost in Quebec (talk) 13:16, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Court Treasurers

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: This category name is vague, and currently has one template it is (I moved the other template to a more specific category). I think we should merge it. If not merged, it should be renamed and populated. Mason (talk) 02:32, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can it be populated?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 08:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Marcelus is welcome to try. Mason (talk) 13:37, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will do that in a free time, but I think nominator should make an effort. Marcelus (talk) 14:17, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:History of the Middle East

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: merge or reverse merge, Middle East and West Asia are too similar to keep them in separate category trees. I will tag both categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Close Enough

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Only contains a single article. (Oinkers42) (talk) 05:07, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Agriculture ministers of Bangladesh

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Standardizing category titles for consistency and easier navigation. HueMan1 (talk) 01:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Antisemitism in China

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: this category contains only three articles: a main article, a media, and an Internet celebrity, Not to mention that anti-Semitism in China has only appeared on the Internet in recent years. Coddlebean (talk) 04:14, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Queen of Hearts (talk) 02:09, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I am seeing consensus to purge, but no clear consensus on whether this should be kept.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think that we should purge and if there's more than two pages left, the category can be kept. (I'm using two as a benchmark because two pages can be clearly wikilinked). Mason (talk) 01:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Characters in Greek mythology by location

[edit]
More categories
Nominator's rationale: I have added these categories to Category:Mythological people by nationality (most as subcats of Category:Mythological Greek people‎), and I think the category tree would be better served using the same naming structure as Category:Legendary people by nationality and Category:Fictional people by nationality. It would open the scope to mythological people from any mythology not just Greek. Mclay1 (talk) 13:29, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose — consistency is good, but we should never seek it at the expense of utility. The proposed change loses a lot of clarity — few readers will know what an “Aegenitan” is, but the “Greek mythology” in the current category helps them. On the inclusion of non-Greek mythology, the only relevant category would be Roman mythology, and there’s nothing stopping a page being in two categories if that is helpful. UndercoverClassicist T·C 13:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe having "Greek" in the category name provides much clarity. Most of the categories will be subcategories of Category:Mythological Greek people anyway. We have the category Category:Ancient Aeginetans. If there is an issue with using accurate names for peoples in case readers aren't aware of those names, we could rename Category:Ancient Aeginetans to Category:People from ancient Aegina and the mythology category can be Category:Mythological people from Aegina, which is also a lot clearer than the current category name. I don't mind which name we use; it doesn't affect the point of the move. Mclay1 (talk) 13:59, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on P Aculeius's suggestion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Histories of cities in North Korea

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:43, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Queen of Hearts (talk) 23:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should merge/create a Korean-wide Category:Histories of cities in Korea as an alternative target. I think that it's fine to have Histories of cities in South Korea in the new category. There are many examples were the SK category is sufficiently populated, but the NK category doesn't exist yet. Mason (talk) 00:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on Mason's suggestion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1990s religious comedy films

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Newly created category for 1 article. Category:Religious comedy films not subcategorized by time. Gjs238 (talk) 14:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If we create more, is that acceptable? But it's difficult via mobile and I don't have desktop access at the moment. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:56, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Three pages and one subcategory as of relisting.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:24, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Beyincé family

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: I don't know why this category for Beyoncé's family is named after the surname of her non-notable maternal grandfather and much less famous cousin Angela Beyincé. Her mother (Tina Knowles) was born with the surname "Beyonce". On the other hand, her father (Mathew Knowles) has an article and his surname is more well-known. It would be best to expand this category to include all members of Beyoncé's and Jay-Z's family, with the focus on them since they are objectively the most notable members. Mclay1 (talk) 04:40, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Monarchs of South Africa

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: rename, few of these monarchs were monarch of the entirety of South Africa so "in" is a better preposition. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Heroes who ventured to Hades

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Currently a very poetic name, and ambiguous because Hades can also refer to the god. It's a subcategory of Category:Katabasis (a journey to the underworld). Renaming would expand the scope to depictions of katabasis in classical mythology and not just heroes (the category currently contains Sisyphus, who was not a hero) and not just Greek mythology (the category currently contains Aeneas, whose story was part of Roman mythology). Mclay1 (talk) 15:47, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Comments on rename target?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 15:01, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Same question: Comment on rename target?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Governors of the Ottoman Empire by century

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. This is category only has one isolated category in it, which isn't helpful for navigation. Mason (talk) 14:21, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, this is easily solvable by creating new categories. I’ll do it when I get back to my computer. Aintabli (talk) 14:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I will add the subcategories to the nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no opinion on whether this is a good idea or not. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:06, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I meant that we should merge within century, not across century. Mason (talk) 01:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]