Hi Copyright team, I have a feedback for this report: I show a very intense personal harassment campaign against me by Azure94 who reported my edits again and he uses the "copyright tool" just for the harassment. He has very minimal own edits, his campaign to remove all my edits from Wikipedia, he also remove my added images from articles, and all other sourced reliable academic contents just because I added those.

In July:

Because of long debate on other talk pages, edit war by Azure94 against academic sources: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hungary#Agressive edit war on Hungarian topics. Often naming me "troll, bizarre, schizophrenic" [6][7][8] same profane insults with a very respected editor after following my edits:1. Then Azure94 intentionally followed me to many articles as revenge, he exclusively edited almost only those articles what I edited recently, and started exclusively harass my edits on these pages. A small settlement had a few lead sentence, I added a church and fresco history, then Azure94 deliberately removed the full chapter because of "copyright", instead of fix those minor things giving an extra job for the admins: Sopronbánfalva [9] In the reality Azure94 does not care with the copyright or with the article, he just follows me in articles what I edited as personal revenge to make continuous conflicts. Wizardman from the copyright team, slightly changed and restored the content, then Azure94 scolded the admin that he is not satisfied, he wants more removal of my content: [10] User talk:Wizardman#Sopronbánfalva In other way, Azure94 said, it is a "big copyright problem" that I translated a non English, Hungarian text "good chance" to "probably" [11], while some hours later he copy-pasted a very long English text words by words in an article where again he followed my edit: [12][13]. Which means he does not care with the copyright in his case. Here Talk:Gesta Hungarorum#Dennis Deletant, he said "Be more careful next time" because I did not copy-pasted exactly the same text to avoid copyright issue, then he copy-pasted the text word by word from the English source.

3 weeks later, in August:

Azure94 did not do any edit 3 weeks long, but he suddenly appeared and exclusively started again bigger intensity to follow only my older contributions which are presented on my user pages. Azure94 has not much own edits, he started exclusively delete only my contents in many different articles as personal harrasment, and he did all this only within 1 hour! period, which clearly show his personal harrasment intentions and not the deep knowledge in many different articles.

Within 1 hour period:

Copyright team slightly modified and restored my content, but he removed even more content: Sopronbánfalva [14]

He removed academic sourced content what I added recently: Bratislava [15]

He wanted to remove all my edits: Ladislaus I of Hungary [16]

He removed my personally captured photos: Anonymus (notary of Béla III) [17]

He wants delete my old edits:Turul [18]

He wants delete my old edits: Seven chieftains of the Magyars [19]

He wants delete my old edits: Attila [20]

He wants delete my old edits: Albert Wass [21]

I created this article earlier, the topic is about an old illustrated book, a series of king portraits, illustrations are the essence which are used in many medieval articles, all relevant and have descriptions, he removed all of them (c.15,000 characters): Nádasdy Mausoleum [22]

I wrote the full reported article with a lot of effort to create a great article (my version), the topic is about an old medieval famous illustrated book, illustrations are the essence which are used in many medieval articles, all relevant, they are listed separate and have a long descriptions (as many articles has a list), first Azure94 removed all of them (c.48,000 characters), this is cleary a vandalism: Chronica Hungarorum [23] Some minutes later he removed completely the full article (even no word remains) based on allegedly copyright only because I wrote it many months ago: [24]

As we can see, he has a great obsession to critize my every single edits to perish them, even Azure94 checked my content with a tool he emphasized here 1 My academic source is a desrciption from an open Hungarian state library about a medieval book, however my article is quite complex and different not a copy pasted contents word by words as Azure did in his edits as I presented above. That tool show matches like: "At the end of the", "history of the Hungarians", "medieval Hungarian chronicles", "The Augsburg edition had two versions". I do not know how should I write different these things, should we add copyright protection to every single English words because everybody else using them? These basic essential matches is the nature of the topic. It is clear this is a deliberate teasing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OrionNimrod (talk • contribs) 19:55, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]