Nominating featured lists in Wikipedia Welcome to featured list candidates! Here, we determine which lists are of a good enough quality to be featured lists (FLs). Featured lists exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and must satisfy the featured list criteria. Before nominating a list, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at peer review. This process is not a substitute for peer review. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the featured list candidate (FLC) process. Those who are not significant contributors to the list should consult regular editors of the list before nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly. A list should not be listed at featured list candidates and another review process at the same time. Nominators should not add a second featured list nomination until the first has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed. The featured list director, Giants2008, or his delegate, PresN, determine the timing of the process for each nomination. Each nomination will typically last at least twenty days, but may last longer if changes are ongoing or insufficient discussion or analysis has occurred. For a nomination to be promoted to FL status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. The directors determine whether there is consensus. A nomination will be removed from the list and archived if, in the judgment of the director who considers a nomination and its reviews: actionable objections have not been resolved in a timely manner; or consensus for promotion has not been reached after significant time; or reviewers are unable to judge whether the criteria have been met. It is assumed that all nominations have good qualities; this is why the process focuses on finding and resolving problems in relation to the criteria, rather than asserting the positives. Declarations of support are not as important as finding and resolving issues, and the process is not simply vote-counting. Once the director or delegate has decided to close a nomination, they will do so on the nominations page. A bot will update the list talk page after the list is promoted or the nomination archived, typically within the day, and the ((FLC)) template should remain on the talk page until the bot updates or adds the ((Article history)) template. If a nomination is archived, the nominator should take adequate time to resolve issues before re-nominating. Purge the cache to refresh this page – Table of contents – Closing instructions – Checklinks – Dablinks – Check redirects

Shortcut WP:FLC v t e Featured content: Featured articles Featured lists ← Featured pictures Featured topics Featured list tools: Featured list criteria Featured list candidates Featured list removal candidates Featured list statistics Wikipedians by promoted featured list nominations Today's featured list This month's queue TFL submissions TFL statistics Featured lists that have appeared as TFL Featured lists yet to appear as TFL Featured list log Random featured list Former featured lists Removal candidates log

Nomination procedure Toolbox Analysis Before nominating a list, ensure that it meets all of the FL criteria and that any peer reviews are closed and archived. Place ((subst:FLC)) on the talk page of the nominated list. From the FLC template, click on the red "initiate the nomination" link. You will see pre-loaded information; leave that text. If you are unsure how to complete a nomination, please leave a post on the FLC talk page for assistance. Below the preloaded title, complete the nomination page, sign with ~~~~ and save the page. Finally, place ((Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/name of nominated list/archiveNumber)) at the top of the list of nominees on this page by first copying the above, clicking "edit" on the top of this page, and then pasting, making sure to add the name of the nominated list. When adding a candidate, mention the name of the list in the edit summary. Reviewing procedure Please read a nominated list fully before deciding to support or oppose a nomination. To respond to a nomination, click the "Edit" link to the right of the list nomination (not the "Edit this page" link for the whole FLC page). To support a nomination, write * '''Support''', followed by your reason(s). If you have been a significant contributor to the list before its nomination, please indicate this. Supports are weighted more strongly if they are given alongside justifications that indicate that the list was fully reviewed; a nomination is not just a straight vote. To oppose a nomination, write * '''Oppose''', followed by your reason(s). Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to address the objection, the director may ignore it. Please focus your attention on substantive issues or inconsistencies, rather than personal style preferences. Reviewers who object are strongly encouraged to return after a few days to check whether their objection has been addressed, and nominators are encouraged to use ((reply to)) or other templates to notify reviewers when replying. To withdraw an objection, strike it out (with <s> ... </s>), rather than removing it. If a nominator feels that an oppose vote has been addressed, they should say so, rather than striking out the reviewer's text. Nominators should not cap, alter, strike, or add graphics to comments from other editors; replies are added below the signature on the reviewer's commentary. If a nominator finds that an opposing reviewer is not returning to the nomination page to revisit improvements, this should be noted on the nomination page. Graphics (such as ((done)) and ((not done))) are discouraged, as they slow down the page load time. To provide constructive input on a nomination without specifically supporting or objecting, write * '''Comment''' followed by your advice.

List of Jacksonville Jaguars seasons

Nominator(s): Hey man im josh (talk) 16:25, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is my third nomination of an NFL team season list and I believe it meets all of our criteria. The format is based on past successful nominations of List of Detroit Lions seasons and List of New Orleans Saints seasons. As always, I will do my best to respond quickly to address any and all concerns that are brought up. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:25, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pseud 14

• No issues with prose in the lead. I do think "winningest" is a bit informal, perhaps consider tweaking that in the caption.
• I think the image placement needs to be redone. Perhaps move Tom's image under the "Seasons" section so it doesn't overcrowd your lead. (similar to the other FLs of Detroit and New Orleans). Seems File:Tom Coughlin crop.jpg is a much better image. Pseud 14 (talk) 21:39, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Taylor Swift live performances

Nominator(s): Ippantekina (talk) 02:58, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This list covers the live performances of Taylor Swift, who has recently become the first artist to headline a $1 billion-grossing tour. Kudos to Medxvo for assisting with removing NONRS. Ippantekina (talk) 02:58, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Vegas Golden Knights draft picks

Nominator(s): The Kip ^(contribs) 22:42, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Having been inspired by @XR228, I've decided to nominate this for FL. After expanding the lead with prose and making some accessibility additions, I believe it successfully meets all FL criteria. The Kip ^(contribs) 22:42, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment

The article shouldn't be started off with "This is a complete list of...", per MOS:THISISALIST. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. The Kip ^(contribs) 23:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• Lead image should not use forced pixel size, instead use the "upright" parameter, potentially with a multiplier e.g. "upright=1.3"
• I feel like ice hockey should be specifically mentioned/linked somewhere. Maybe mimic the opening of List of Seattle Kraken draft picks, also currently at FLC
• "2017 second-round pick Nicolas Hague has played the most games for Vegas of any draft picks" => "2017 second-round pick Nicolas Hague has played the most games for Vegas of any draft pick"
• "Wins, losses, ties, overtime losses and goals against average apply to goaltenders" - there's no column for ties.....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:43, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  All taken care of. I'd removed ties from the chart a while back as VGK was founded long after their demise, but forgot to remove from that descriptor. The Kip ^(contribs) 18:56, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of soricines

Nominator(s): PresN 22:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Alright, mammal list #40 and the 5th and final subgroup of Eulipotyphlans: the subfamily Soricinae! It's... 150+ more shrews. They look identical to each other and to the ones in the previous shrew lists; turns out the smaller the mammal, the wider variety of species can coexist geographically, so there's as many minor variations on shrew species as there are members of every Carnivora family. They're pretty cute, I think, but not really super visually distinct from each other. If you've never seen one, it's because they're busy: shrews eat at least their own body weight in food every single day, so they're very busy vacuuming up all the bugs hiding under leaves on the forest floors. Unfortunately, this means they don't have a lot of time to pose for pictures, so, as in previous lists, the ones in Central America, southeast Asia, and the non-populated parts of China just don't have free-use pictures. As always, this list follows all the conventions we've built up over the last dozens of FLCs, and should be good to go. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 22:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Pseud 14

• Nothing to quibble and I see the wikilinks on the ecosystems you had mentioned in your prior nomination applied. Happy to support for promotion. Although a very minor observation (which I may be unfamiliar with), in the "Scientific name and subspecies" column, is there a reason why some scientists are in parenthetical while some are not? Pseud 14 (talk) 22:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Pseud 14: Yep, per binomial nomenclature, you do that when the original namer put the species in a different genus than it's currently included in - so e.g. the southern short-tailed shrew is currently Blarina carolinensis, but (Bachman, 1837) originally had it as Sorex carolinensis, and that's the official way to denote that, apparently. --PresN 00:36, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

  Very interesting. Thanks for the explanation and insight into it. Pseud 14 (talk) 00:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - I got nothing :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Intercontinental Cup (football) matches

Nominator(s): NapHit (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spent some time working on this article about a quirky former football competition to bring it up to featured standard and complete the UEFA club competition winners topic. Thanks in advance for your comments. NapHit (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "The Intercontinental Cup was disbanded" - I think "discontinued" would be a more appropriate word
• "In its first eight editions, the competition's winner was decided on a points system" - the table shows nine
• "determine the outcome in case of a tie" => "determine the outcome in the event of a draw"
• "The most successful confederation is CONMEBOL, teams representing the confederation have won the competition 22 times" => "The most successful confederation is CONMEBOL, teams representing the confederation having won the competition 22 times"
• Why are there flags by the two Japanese stadiums but not any other stadium?
• Note o is missing its full stop -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:02, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MPGuy2824

• In tables where you have rowspans for header cells, there the scope should be "rowgroup".
• I don't understand the sorting within the Score column. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:01, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of BBC National Short Story Award winners

Nominator(s): Il lupa (talk) 13:02, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a comprehensive list of writers shortlisted for the annual BBC National Short Story Award. It's the first list article that I've made but, as far as I can tell, it meets all the criteria for a featured list. Il lupa (talk) 13:02, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "(previously known as the National Short Story Award, 2006-2007)" - I think "(known as the National Short Story Award in 2006 and 2007)" would work better
• "It is an annual short story contest in the United Kingdom which is open to UK residents and nationals" - I would move it to the first sentence i.e. "The BBC National Short Story Award is an annual....." and then move the bit about it being prestigious into the second sentence
• "the winners receives" - this should be easier "the winner receives" or "the winners receive" but not what you have currently
• Both notes need a full stop
• That's all I got - great first nom! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:50, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MPGuy2824

• Sorting the results column should put the runner-ups between the winners and the short-listed candidates.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 2001 becomes !scope=row | 2001 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:49, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Seattle Kraken draft picks

Nominator(s): XR228 (talk) 19:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have gotten the lead of the article to a level that I think meets the criteria. Everything else should be good too. Thanks. XR228 (talk) 19:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• Link the team name on first usage
• "Only four of the Kraken's draft picks of gone on to play" => "Only four of the Kraken's draft picks have gone on to play"
• Per MOS:COLOR, you cannot use just colour to highlight something, as readers with visual problems may not be able to identify the colours. You need to also use a symbol.
• That's all I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:18, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I have made the changes. XR228 (talk) 19:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MPGuy2824

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ ((sronly|caption_text)) instead.
• One cell in every row should be the header cell and it should begin with a "!" instead of a "|". You can also use rowspan for the years, since a lot of them are in common. You should change the scope to "rowgroup" if you do this. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:54, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

• Since their creation, the Kraken have drafted 28 players, the 2023 NHL entry draft being the third in which they participated. – The juxtaposition from picks to the 2023 being their third draft is choppy and needs rewording.
• You switch back and forth calling them Seattle and Kraken in the lead, pick one and stick with it.
• Down case 2021 NHL Entry Draft to 2021 NHL entry draft
• There's a lot of info that could be helpful that's not included in the second paragraph and I think it needs to be expanded to better explain the draft process a bit. A high level overview obviously, but this isn't as clear as I think it could be.
• After the end of his rookie 2022–23 season, Beniers won the Calder Memorial Trophy as the League’s best rookie – Remove "end of his rookie" from the first part of the sentence. The second part explains the award clearly enough that this information is redundant.
• ...managing 24 goals and 33 assists in 80 games. – Probably improved by replacing "managing" with "having accumulated".
• The Kraken's second overall draft pick in 2021 was the highest they have ever drafted. – Could be reworded to be better I think. Something like, "The highest the Kraken have ever drafted was in 2021, when they had the second overall pick." or "The Kraken have never selected higher than in 2021, when they had the second overall pick."
• Don't switch between using "second" in the lead and then using "1st-round pick" at the end. Be consistent, at least in prose, with the usage of words.
• Ref 5 missing publisher date
• Date format is inconsistent in sources
• Usage of publishers not consistent in refs (Ref 1 and 2 use "National Hockey League" while ref 3 uses "NHL.com")
• Inconsistent wikilinking of publishers, please wikilink publishers for consistency
• Ref 4 needs to be marked as a subscription being required
• The source uses combines the ties plus overtime losses columns. Is there a reason you've separate them out? It doesn't look like there's any sources linked that show these being counted separately.
• Per MOS:NOTSEEALSO, the see also section should not be linking to their first draft.

That's what I've got for now, though I think on a re-pass over I'll probably find more. Please ping me when you respond. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:49, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have made the changes. XR228 (talk) 00:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Snooker world rankings 1986/1987

Nominator(s): BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you've seen any of the earlier Snooker world rankings articles and wondered how they could make the system even more complicated and unfair, the answers lie within. Ranking points, comparison of performances in the most recent year, merit points, "A" points and frames won are all in the mix. Steve Davis topped the list once again, by a considerable margin. As always, extracts from relevant sources are available on request to reviewers. All improvement suggestions are welcome. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "He noted that WPBSA chairman Rex Williams was ranked 16th instead of John Parrott who had the same number of ranking points as Williams but more merit points," => "He noted that WPBSA chairman Rex Williams was ranked 16th instead of John Parrott, who had the same number of ranking points as Williams but more merit points,"
• "in the 1985/1986 season top 16 players were" => "in the 1985/1986 season the top 16 players were"
• "Williams has been ranked 27th the previous season" => "Williams had been ranked 27th the previous season"
• "Other Ranking Tournaments" => "Other ranking tournaments"
• "If player were still equal" -> "If players were still equal" (in three places) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:10, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Johnson solids

Nominator(s): Dedhert.Jr (talk) 07:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first time nominating FL, and I hope this meets all the criteria of FL. One reason I am nominating this for the featured list is because it is a complete list of Johnson solids, along with the surface area and volume, as well as the symmetry. As for the background for someone who does not comprehend mathematics, especially in geometry, the Johnson solids were in the list proposed by Norman Johnson, and he conjectured that there were no other solids, after which was proved by Victor Zalgaller. I think I can give three examples for the exhibition:

• 
  Square pyramid
• 
  Triaugmented triangular prism
• 
  snub disphenoid

There are actually 92 of them, but I would not exhibit them a lot here. I hope this could be the next FL of WP:WPM, and it could be the first FL of sister WikiProject, WP:3TOPE. Anyone, including someone interested in it, can review this. Many thanks for the comments and suggestions. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 07:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remsense

Claiming a spot here, since I think it's a great article and I still want to properly go through it like I promised. Remsense诉 07:23, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sgubaldo – Initial Comments

• Prose
  • "It is also includes the number of vertices, edges, and faces, symmetry, surface area...." ==> "It also includes the number of vertices, edges, and faces, symmetry, surface area..."

    Removed an ungrammatical word. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 12:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • "attaching prism or antiprism to those is known as elongation or gyroelongation, respectively." ==> "attaching a prism or antiprism to those is known as elongation or gyroelongation respectively."

    I thought a comma would be supposed to be, but oh well, removed. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 12:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Sourcing – This is not a source review, just some things I spotted
  • For "Daniele Barbaro’s Perspective of 1568", the author's first name is 'Cosimo' not 'Cosino'.

    Renamed. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 12:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Cromwell's Polyhedra book is missing an ISBN, which you can find here.

    Added. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 12:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Zalgaller's source is missing an ISBN and the publisher looks wrong. I found this page on Springer

    Nice. Added. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 12:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • For "Group Theory in Solid State Physics and Photonics: Problem Solving with Mathematica" and "2D and 3D Image Analysis by Moments", the publisher is called 'John Wiley & Sons', not 'John & Sons Wiley'.

    My mistake. Renamed. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 12:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wikilink Canadian Journal of Mathematics.

    Wikilinked. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 12:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've been told you can either wikilink publishers or leave them unlinked as long as you're consistent. You've wikilinked Cambridge University Press but none of the others; it would be good if you could either delink Cambridge University Press or wikilink John Wiley & Sons, Springer, Academic Press, American Mathematical Society and Dover Publications.

    Wikilinked all, just in case. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 12:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Some of the authors have their full first name and some only have their initial; I believe this can be done in one way or the other but it has to be consistent.

    @Sgubaldo. Sorry, I do not understand here. Are you saying the author's initial name should be either abbreviated or fully named in all of the sources? Dedhert.Jr (talk) 12:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Yes. For example, have all of them either lik "Cromwell, Peter R." or like "Diudea, M. V." Sgubaldo (talk) 12:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Well, to think about the efficient way, it would be best to abbreviate at all, rather than finding out their first full names. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 14:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sgubaldo. I think I have complete all of the suggestions above. Let me know if there are any remaining missing. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 15:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one, I'll have a full read-through later. In the meantime, I've added some urls/other missing author links myself. Sgubaldo (talk) 16:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Boston Bruins seasons

Nominator(s): XR228 (talk) 06:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some paragraphs to the lead of this article, which I think live up to good standards. All of the playoff information in the table itself is adequately sourced. This article should meet the Featured List criteria. Thank you. XR228 (talk) 06:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ ((sronly|caption_text)) instead.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. You have them for all but the 'Regular season' and 'Postseason' column headers. Since those two cover multiple columns, the column scopes should be added with a !scope=colgroup, e.g. !colspan="9"|[[Season structure of the NHL|Regular season]] becomes !scope=colgroup colspan="9"|[[Season structure of the NHL|Regular season]].
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. |[[1924–25 NHL season|1924–25]] becomes !scope=row |[[1924–25 NHL season|1924–25]]. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --PresN 01:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

  I have made the changes. XR228 (talk) 04:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "with 2023–24 season marking" => "with the 2023–24 season marking"
• "The Bruins would fare decently" => "The Bruins fared decently"
• "They would make up for the drought" => "They made up for the drought"
• " The Bruins would miss the playoffs in 1997" => " The Bruins missed the playoffs in 1997"
• "finishing with the worst record of the season with 61 points" - source?
• "ending a 29-year playoff appearance streak, the longest in NHL history" - source?
• "Throughout the next nine seasons, the Bruins would face a rough patch" => "Throughout the next nine seasons, the Bruins faced a rough patch"
• "The Bruins would start another playoff streak in 2008" => "The Bruins started another playoff streak in 2008"
• "In 2011, the Bruins would defeat the Vancouver Canucks" => "In 2011, the Bruins defeated the Vancouver Canucks"
• "but they would lose in the second round of the playoffs to the Canadiens" => "but they lost in the second round of the playoffs to the Canadiens"
• "The next season, the Bruins' playoff streak would end at seven seasons" => "The next season, the Bruins' playoff streak ended at seven seasons"
• "after failing to qualify by two points" => "after they failed to qualify by two points"
• Also, what's the source for that "two points" bit?
• "They would miss the playoffs for a second season in 2016, but qualify in 2017" => "They missed the playoffs for a second season in 2016, but qualified in 2017"
• "However, Bruins would come out on top" => "However, the Bruins came out on top "
• "They would lose in the second round of the playoffs to the Tampa Bay Lightning" => "They lost in the second round of the playoffs to the Tampa Bay Lightning"
• "The 2022–23 season, would see the Bruins make history" => "The 2022–23 season, saw the Bruins make history"
• Also, why did this make history?
• "However, they would get upset in the first round of the playoffs" => "However, they got upset in the first round of the playoffs"
• "after blowing a 3–1 series lead" - source?
• "In the 2024 playoffs, they would lose to the Panthers again" => "In the 2024 playoffs, they lost to the Panthers again"
• "From the 1926–27 season through the 1937–38 season, Boston played in the American Division." - don't think this needs to be a note as it's quite clear from the table. Maybe replace the text of this note with something like "with effect from the 1926-27 season, the NHL split into [however many] divisions because of [reasons]"
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I have made the changes. XR228 (talk) 00:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Four of the unnecessary "would"s are still present..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:22, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MPGuy2824

• The terms in the "Key of terms and abbreviations" table aren't necessary. You can just use the ((Abbrev)) template in the header cell. e.g. W, L, T. For some of the others a footnote would do.
• Please fix "((sronly|caption_text))".
• The "↑" symbol isn't necessary IMO since it is always mentioned next to text stating that they "won the Stanley Cup finals vs Opponent X".
• In the result column, there is no need to mention multiple wins of the same season. Just the best win can be included. i.e. SF is better than QF, and Final is better than SF.
• Making the table sortable would involve some work, but it would be useful imo.
• That's all I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I feel it is necessary to keep a full list of opponents faced in a season; all the other NHL season featured lists do it. Same goes for many of the other suggested changes. XR228 (talk) 04:19, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  With regards to point 4 - virtually all season tablea across all sports have playoff progression, rather than just whatever the best result was. The Kip ^(contribs) 19:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I have made the appropriate changes. XR228 (talk) 01:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Line of Duty episodes

Nominator(s): TheDoctorWho (talk) 07:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Second and final stop at FLC for a good topic I'm working towards. Still waiting on quite a few GA reviews before I can get there (plus two articles I still need to do some expansion on), so I thought I'd get this FLC going in the meantime. This is the episodes page for a popular UK television series. It has set quite a few records in terms of viewership so there were enough sources to write a pretty engaging lead so I spent a few hours tonight expanding it. I look forward and thank you all in advance for any reviews! :) TheDoctorWho (talk) 07:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "directed towards BBC Two[3] which" - I would recommend a comma after Two
• "in over ten years[12] leading" - also a comma after years
• "The series has been nominated for several awards[29] also gaining" - comma after awards
• "Additionally, Craig Parkinson,[45] Jessica Raine,[46] Jason Watkins,[47] and Anna Maxwell Martin[48] also star" - I don't think you need to say both "additionally" and "also". Is there a way to reword this?
• "special mini-episode written by the Dawson Brothers" - our article says the group is called Dawson Bros.
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  You strike again as my first reviewer!

  I fixed the first four comments.

  For the fifth: I considered listing them as Bros. based on our article, but the source I cited the credit to lists them as the Brothers (specifically "The virtual pantomime has been written by the Dawson Brothers, the comedy writers behind this year’s hilarious Line Of Duty Sport Relief Special [...]") The mini-episode didn't actually have any credits, which is what we list ours from most of the time. That said, I don't have any objection whatsoever to changing it if you still think it should be changed, I just wanted to mention my thought process first?

  Thanks again, TheDoctorWho (talk) 08:10, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of Green Bay Packers players

Nominator(s): « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With some precedence of alternative lists at FLC (see Outline of lichens), I am offering up a list of lists to FLC: Lists of Green Bay Packers players. This index list provides an overview of all the various player-related lists for the Green Bay Packers. This includes 16 different lists (noting that the All-Time Roster is split into 4 additional standalone lists due to length), as well as other pertinent information (the team's current roster, photos on Commons and relevant external links). Per FLC criteria, this list provides a full lead summarizing the relevant material and has 3 freely licensed images. As always, happy to discuss and resolve any comments. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Detroit Lions draft history

Nominator(s): Hey man im josh (talk) 14:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My last 11 nominations have been based on NFL first-round draft picks, but given that that series is now all promoted or nominated, it's time to move on to my next project! I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets all the criteria and as part of what I hope to be my first featured topic (this would be the subject of the topic, with 3 sub lists eventually). This list is based on Green Bay Packers draft history, which was promoted to featured list status on March 23, 2024. As always, I will do my best to respond quickly to address any and all concerns that are brought up. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gonzo_fan2007 (Source review: Passed)

• When you do complete the individual picks lists, are you planning to link them from the table, similar to Green Bay Packers draft history?
• the franchise was relocated to Detroit and renamed to the Detroit Lions in, I think you could drop the second "Detroit" and just say "renamed to the Lions".
• Billy Sims and 1950 NFL draft have duplicate links in the lead
• Source review:
  • Reliable sources on what is being cited
  • Consistent formatting
  • Spot checks on sources match what they are being cited for
  • Ref 10 and 44 are the same, should be combined.
• Support on sources and overall! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you very much for the review @Gonzo fan2007!

  • If you view the table with source editor you'll see that I've actually got all the links in the table ready and commented out for when I move the individual pick lists to main space.
  • I think you could drop the second "Detroit" and just say "renamed to the Lions". – I'm hesitant to do this just for the reason that someone might mislead the statement to mean they were renamed to the "Portsmouth Lions".
  • Refs 10 and 44 have been combined.

  Aside from the comment about naming, I believe everything has been addressed. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Awesome, nice work! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:56, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pseud 14

• With the eigth pick -- eighth pick
• In addition to the 1984 supplemental draft, since 1977 the NFL has hosted an annual supplemental draft -- think it should work better if changed to: In addition to the 1984 supplemental draft, the NFL has hosted an annual supplemental draft since 1977...
• The Lions have selected first overall in a draft four times, selecting Frank Sinkwich -- suggest switching variation on selected then selecting to avoid being repetitive
• That's all from me. Great work as always. Pseud 14 (talk) 19:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Pseud 14:

  • Fixed typo
  • Made suggested change
  • The Lions have selected first overall in a draft four times, selecting... -> The Lions have drafted first overall four times, selecting... – Does that work you think?

  I very much appreciate your feedback, thank you for the review! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Changes look good. Support. Pseud 14 (talk) 19:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "In 1936, the Lions took part in the first NFL draft of college football players and have participated in every NFL draft since." => "The Lions took part in the first NFL draft of college football players in 1936 and have participated in every NFL draft since."
• "except for the short-lived All-America Football Conference (AAFC) in the late 1940s" - does this mean that that league also had a draft? If so then "except for that of the short-lived All-America Football Conference (AAFC) in the late 1940s"
• "special drafts have occurred. This included" => "special drafts have occurred. These included"
• " the number of rounds and the number of picks has fluctuated significantly" => " the number of rounds and the number of picks have fluctuated significantly"
• "The Lions participated in in the most recent draft in 2024" - duplicate "in"
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • "In 1936, the Lions took part in the first NFL draft of college football players and have participated in every NFL draft since." -> "The Lions took part in the first NFL draft of college football players in 1936 and have participated in every NFL draft since." – Done, that does work better imo.
  • "except for the short-lived All-America Football Conference (AAFC) in the late 1940s" - does this mean that that league also had a draft? If so then "except for that of the short-lived All-America Football Conference (AAFC) in the late 1940s" – It did, I've made the change.
  • "special drafts have occurred. This included" -> "special drafts have occurred. These included" – Done.
  • " the number of rounds and the number of picks has fluctuated significantly" -> " the number of rounds and the number of picks have fluctuated significantly" – Done.
  • "The Lions participated in in the most recent draft in 2024" - duplicate "in" – D'oh, done.

  Thanks so much for the review and feedback @ChrisTheDude! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some comments by Lee V

• I like that the lede goes into depths straight away about what the team is, and it's history.
• Do we need to use the word "franchise". It's quite an American term for a team.Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:14, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I agree, it is a rather American term, but after giving it some thought I do feel it is probably the best terminology for referring to the organization. Absolutely open to suggestions, but the only other terms that sprung to mind were team, club, and organization, none of which felt more appropriate than franchise in this context. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The article seems to require that you know what a draft is. The lede just states they were in the first one. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:14, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Hmmm. Do you mean draft as a general concept, or to better explain the purpose of the NFL drafts? For reference, I've typically used the second and third paragraphs at List of Detroit Lions first-round draft picks (with tweaks where appropriate) to explain the concept. This phrasing was taken and modified from the promoted Green Bay Packers draft history (which obviously doesn't mean it's not possibly to improve upon), which is why it differs. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:22, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Just in general really. From a UK audience, a draft is a thing that sends people to war, or you buy in pints. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:04, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I think and hope I've addressed that by adding "When a team selects a player, the team receives exclusive rights to sign that player to a contract and no other team in the league may sign them, with limited exceptions.: Hey man im josh (talk) 19:59, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• competing leagues.[22][23][24][25][26 - could we try WP:BUNDLING. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:14, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• I think the table could do with a small intro to explain what the rounds and original draft order are rather than using notes. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:14, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Lee Vilenski: What do you think of a rework to something like User:Hey man im josh/sandbox? Also pinging @Gonzo fan2007. I would obviously clean this up more appropriately, but I do think, if more information is included, the lead becomes too long. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:38, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Admittedly, I am biased, but I think the current format is better. I don't think there is anything wrong with using notes. My thought to address the comment above would be to maybe add to the NFL draft was the only selection process to retain the rights to sign college football players collegiate draft for players of American football. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I too am biased towards notes. I'm struggling with striking the right balance between information at a glance vs expecting readers to go to other articles for more in depth info. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of historic places in Kaikōura District

Nominator(s): Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 20:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of these Heritage New Zealand lists! Slowly but surely, the histories of the territorial authorities are getting covered by these. Kaikōura District is a rural, isolated region along the mountainous northeastern coast of South Island. Despite only having around 4,000 residents, it boasts ten different historic places — plus two former ones that have sadly been destroyed. I hope everyone enjoys! Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 20:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

MPGuy2824

• Does this pass WP:NLIST? It might be better to group these lists by NZ region, instead of by territorial authority.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:09, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Most territorial authorities have 50+ historic sites; I'm just starting with the smallest. The largest (not counting Auckland and Dunedin, which feel like unfair comparisons here) would be Far North District, with 371. I feel it would simply be unhelpful to group these by region, as the regions would all be several hundred sites long. Canterbury and Otago would have 800. (And, I feel most important for NLIST, Heritage New Zealand lists these sites by local authority on their website.) Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 18:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "Tourism, alongside agriculture and cheesemaking, have become important industries in the area today" - this isn't grammatically correct. I suggest either "Tourism, agriculture and cheesemaking have become important industries in the area today" or, if the point is that tourism is new compared to the other two, then "Tourism has become an important industry in the area today, alongside agriculture and cheesemaking
  • Fixed. -G
• "the eponymous district center of Kaikōura became a small and isolated fishing village after colonisation." - I am not at all familiar with spellings used in New Zealand, but is this mixture of US-style and UK-style spellings really correct? In contrast to "colonisation", later on we have "standardized" and "organized" (US-style) as well as "favor".
  • Oops, always forget to make sure these have NZ spellings. Fixed. - G
• "Associated with the Ngāti Kurī hapū of the Ngāi Tahu iwi." - this isn't a complete sentence so it doesn't need a full stop
• "Was occupeid by the Hailes family" - second word is spelt incorrectly
  • Oops. Fixed! - G
• That's all I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:17, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @ChrisTheDude: And all is fixed! Thank you. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 02:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

Source review: Passed

• Reliable enough for the information being cited
• Consistent date formatting
• Consistent and proper reference formatting
• Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
• Spot checks on sources match what they are being cited for

Feedback:

• I think you're missing "The Elms Farm Complex" from your former list
• Could add an additional ref or two from other sources into the lead, possibly in the first paragraph, since the article is largely sourced to one source

That's the only criticisms I have. Good stuff! Ping me when you reply. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:44, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh: I think I made all the changes you asked! Added a new source to the lede. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 17:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Follow up comments:

• Down case "Former" to "former" in the Elms Farm Complex line added
• Fix publisher link in ref 2 (you did not finish piping it apparently)

That SHOULD be in once that's fixed. When that's done please do ping me again @Generalissima. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh: Oops! Fixed. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 18:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New York City scenic landmarks

Nominator(s): Epicgenius (talk) 13:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because it is a complete, comprehensive list of scenic landmarks designated by the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission. Scenic-landmark designations are one of four landmark designations that the LPC is capable of granting, along with individual-landmark, interior-landmark, and historic-district designations. Though only 12 scenic landmarks have been designated in NYC, they range from world-renowned icons like Central Park to small neighborhood plazas like Verdi Square. After having given this list a once-over, I look forward to all comments and feedback. Epicgenius (talk) 13:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Drive-by comment: why doesn't the "More images" commons link show up under the Central Park photo, like the others? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Oops, I have fixed that. Thanks for pointing it out. – Epicgenius (talk) 19:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

Source review: Passed

• Reliable enough for the information being cited
• Consistent date formatting
• Consistent and proper reference formatting
• Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
• Spot checks on 20 sources match what they are being cited for

Feedback:

• Ref 7 – Note as page 7
• Ref 8 – Note as page 37
• Ref 10 – Note as page 45
• Ref 12 – Note as page 47
• Ref 13 – Note as page 47
• Ref 14 – Note as page 43
• Ref 15 – Note as page 49
• Ref 16 – Note as page 36
• Ref 19 – Note as page 64
• Ref 22 – Note as section M, page 1
• Ref 24 – The source shows a publish date of July 16, 2008, but the reference lists August 15, 2016.
• Ref 25 – I'm seeing a publish date of May 2 @ 8:07pm at the source vs the reference listing May 3. Did you mean to put May 3 as the date based on UTC time?
• Ref 30 – I notice right under the text it mentions a copright for the Associated Press. Is this the agency in this case?
• Ref 32 – Add Veronica Rose as author
• Ref 33 – Remove "Bronx Times" from title. Should the publisher be Bronx Times-Reporter? Or should Bronx Times-Reporter possibly be moved to Bronx Times intead?
• Ref 34 – Update website to "Norwood News" instead of "Norwood News – Serving Norwood, Bedford Park, Fordham and University Heights"
• Ref 36 – Note as page 10
• Ref 39 – I note that the publisher's article is at Smithsonian (magazine) and Template:Smithsonian Institution lists the article as "Smithsonian magazine". Should this title be downcased, or should the template possibly be uppercased?
• Ref 44 – Note as section C, page 1
• Ref 51 – Note as section 1, page 27
• A number of the NYT sources need to be called out as subscription access
• The first and fourth source under the sources section wikilink to the publisher, whereas the rest of the references and sources in the list do not
• City Room as a source – I understand blogs are often, if not usually, considered unreliable. Is City Room treated as a traditional blog, or is the pulisher / platform more reliable because it being hosted / affiliated with the New York Times?
• Should "The Bronx" be sorting as "Bronx" instead? Or is it synonymous enough that people would actually look under T first?
• I think making the description and location unsortable would be beneficial since the sorts for those columns aren't actually helpful in this case
• In the Old Croton Aqueduct Walk row, you wikilinked to Carrère & Hastings which actually redirects to Carrère and Hastings. Probably better to replace "&" with "and" to keep consistent with the article.

That's what I've got for now. Good seeing you at FLC EpicGenius! Please ping me when you reply and I hope to see you around these parts more ;)

Thanks for the review @Hey man im josh, and great to see you here as well. I've fixed almost all of these now.

• For ref 30, yes, that is the agency.
• I've fixed the page numbers for the NYT, and the publishers/works for refs 33, 34, and 39.
• For "The Bronx", most people would look under "Bronx" first.
• I think City Room falls under WP:NEWSBLOG, but the writers there are all NYT staff writers; for example, the writer of this piece was Sewell Chan, who worked at the NYT at the time. It was called a blog because, at the time, most NYT articles appeared in print before they appeared online, whereas the blogs appeared online first (or only appeared online).
• I haven't changed the row headers to make these two columns unsortable, but I will do so shortly.

– Epicgenius (talk) 19:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhh I see you can't change the columns to be unsortable. I'm satisfied with the answers and changes. Support. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "Scenic landmarks are city-owned sites [....] which is also at least 30 years old" - there's a grammar disconnect in this sentence
• Can't see any particular reason for "Pulitzer Fountain" and "Giuseppe Verdi Monument" to be in italics
• That's all I got - great work!! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review @ChrisTheDude. I have fixed both of these issues now. – Epicgenius (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of accolades received by Inception

Nominator(s): Sgubaldo (talk) 09:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My fourth list of accolades nomination. This time, we have another Nolan great, the 2010 film Inception.

Note: My Joker nomination has received four supports, so I am adding a second one. Sgubaldo (talk) 09:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "with particular recognition for its cinematography, score, visual and sound effects, editing as well as Nolan's screenplay and direction" => "with particular recognition for its cinematography, score, visual and sound effects, and editing as well as Nolan's screenplay and direction"
• The King's Speech should be in italics the first time it's used and not linked the second time -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @ChrisTheDude Done. Sgubaldo (talk) 11:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MPGuy2824

• In the table, the scope for header cells which cover only one row should be "row", not "rowgroup".
• The rotten tomatoes ref is missing its archive link.
• That's all I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:53, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @MPGuy2824 Done. Sgubaldo (talk) 11:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Support on prose and table accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Inkigayo Chart winners (2017)

Nominator(s): EN-Jungwon (talk) and Explicit (talk) 16:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the third Inkigayo list that I am nominating to become a featured list. The format of this list is similar to the previous two lists. Appreciate any feedback. -- EN-Jungwon 16:11, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

MPGuy2824

• "since July, 2016" remove the comma.
• Does Korea use the mdy system of writing dates?
• Their singles "Knock Knock", "Signal" and "Likey" ranked number one for three weeks each and achieved a triple crowns in 2017, while "Heart Shaker" went on to achieve a triple crown the following year.
• You can remove the row stating that '"—" denotes an episode did not air that week.' since this info appears in the 'key' table. Alternatively, you can make sure that it always sorts at the bottom.
• 'Prior to her official debut, Minseo took her first award win for "Yes".' This is begging for more explanation.
• That's all I got. Please ping me here after you are done. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824 all done. Majority of Korea related articles use mdy format. From what I can tell this seems to be the accepted format. For Minseo, there is a detailed explanation at Minseo_(singer)#2015–2017:_Pre-debut:_Superstar_K_7,_"Monthly_Yoon_Jong-shin" (last paragraph). It is also mentioned in the source. -- EN-Jungwon 16:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I can't find anything specific in the MOS for dates in Korea-related articles. The date formatting seems consistent throughout the article, so ok.
• Minseo's pre-debut debut: If you can manage to put the explanation in a few words and incorporate it in that the sentence, it would be great. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Note: Korea uses YMD (e.g. 2024년 6월 6일 -> 2024 June 6). There is no established preference in the English language in Korea for MDY or DMY, although you'll often see MDY because Korea leans closer to the American side of the Anglosphere.

  My understanding is that we follow MOS:DATERET for articles without strong MOS:DATETIES (e.g. if the article is about UK–Korea ties then maybe DMY is more appropriate?). Whichever style the primary contributer to the article uses, we follow. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 22:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dank

• Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
• Checking the FLC criteria:
• 1. I did some minor copyediting; feel free to revert. I checked sorting on all sortable nonnumeric columns and sampled the links in the table.
• 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
• 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
• 3b. The UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
• 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, and it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find).
• 4. It is navigable.
• 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
• 6. It is stable.
• Since all the sources are in Korean, which I can't read, I'll have to wait for a source review, but I'm expecting to support at that point. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 20:58, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Billboard Middle-Road Singles number ones of 1964

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:57, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's my fourth nomination in this series. In this particular year, several of the chart-toppers were from Broadway shows, including one by a young singer who would go on to become one of the most successful entertainers of all time. Oh, and despite what you might think at first glance, yes that really is a photo of Ray Charles :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:57, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pseud 14

• was the title song of the stage musical of the same name -- I think it should pipe as stage musical of the same name
• which gave Barbra Streisand the first Billboard chart-topper of one of the most successful careers in popular music history. -- for this part, I think something similar to or along the lines of which gave Barbra Streisand her first Billboard chart-topper and she would go on to have one of the most successful careers in popular music history
• That's all from me. Great work! Pseud 14 (talk) 14:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Pseud 14: - done! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:01, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Pseud 14 (talk) 17:19, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image review: Passed

• Images have alt text
• Images have succinct captions and are relevant to the article
• Images are appropriately licensed. Pseud 14 (talk) 14:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

Source review: Passed

• Reliable enough for the information being cited
• Consistent date formatting
• Consistent and proper reference formatting
• Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
• Spot checks on 15 sources match what they are being cited for
• Assumed good faith on sources I did not have access to

Feedback:

• Ref 3 – Change Huffington Post to The Huffington Post (that's the title we had the page at before they changed their name)
• Ref 4 – Add publish date
• Consider adding the ((Use mdy dates|May 2024)) template to the top of the article under the short description in case anybody else adds references later on and they are not as careful as you've been

Please ping me when the above issues have been addressed. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh: - made those two ref changes. Use MDY template was already present -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I missed it above the short description. Support! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sgubaldo

• Consider splitting the sentence "In 1964, the chart was published under the title Middle-Road Singles through the issue of Billboard dated April 25, Pop-Standard Singles through the issue dated October 17, and Middle-Road Singles again for the remainder of the year, and 12 different songs topped the listing in 52 issues of the magazine" into two parts: "In 1964, the chart was published under the title Middle-Road Singles through the issue of Billboard dated April 25, Pop-Standard Singles through the issue dated October 17, and Middle-Road Singles again for the remainder of the year. 12 different songs topped the listing in 52 issues of the magazine".
• "....nine weeks at number one with "Hello, Dolly!", the longest uninterrupted run in the top spot during 1964" ==> "....nine weeks at number one with "Hello, Dolly!", the longest uninterrupted run in the top spot for the year"

Sgubaldo (talk) 10:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sgubaldo: - done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Sgubaldo (talk) 10:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dank

• Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
• "newly-opened": Although I see these hyphens often and it's not a big deal, MOS:HYPHEN does ask you to drop them.
• Checking the FLC criteria:
• 1. I added one link, but nothing else is jumping out at me as a prose problem. I checked sorting on all sortable nonnumeric columns and sampled the links in the table.
• 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
• 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
• 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
• 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, and it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find).
• 4. It is navigable.
• 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
• 6. It is stable.
• Support. Well done. See "newly-opened", above. - Dank (push to talk) 19:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Dank: - thanks for the review. I amended "newly opened". Maybe it's a UK/US differences, as I am pretty sure on this side of the pond we would always write it with a hyphen.....but maybe I am wrong.....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'm not sure. - Dank (push to talk) 17:45, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of music released by Romanian artists that has charted in major music markets

Nominator(s): Cartoon network freak (talk) 15:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because it offers a well-written and well-sourced overview over the most successful Romanian music released. It is the first list of its kind here on Wikipedia, but I believe it meets the required criteria. I am happy for any comment. Greets, Cartoon network freak (talk) 15:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment - alt text is needed for the images in the article. Staraction (talk | contribs) 02:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Staraction: Done. Cartoon network freak (talk) 07:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Unusual and very interesting topic for an article. Here are my comments:

• "Over the years, several songs and albums released by" - first three words are a bit vague. Maybe "Since the 1970s".....?
• "The first documented instance are the works of nai player Gheorghe Zamfir." - I doubt that there any instances which are not documented, so I would change this to "The first Romanian artist to chart in such markets was the nai player Gheorghe Zamfir."
• "soprano opera singer Angela Gheorghiu started charting multiple albums" => "soprano opera singer Angela Gheorghiu charted multiple albums"
• "and in a few other European countries" => "and in European countries"
• "both of which stand as two of the " => "which stand as two of the "
• ""Musica" (2011) by group Fly Project " => ""Musica" (2011) by the group Fly Project "
• "as well as "I Need Your Love" " => "and "I Need Your Love" "
• Notes: "This article lists all music releases, where there is at least one Romanian artist or act credited among the lead or featured artist(s)." => "This article lists all charting releases, where there is at least one Romanian artist or act credited among the lead or featured artist(s)."
• "has annualy published" => "has annually published"
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude: Many thanks for your comments! I solved them. Let me know if you support the nomination. Greets, Cartoon network freak (talk) 09:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

United States congressional delegations from Arizona

Nominator(s): Staraction (talk | contribs) 15:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Second congressional delegations nomination from me, the first being United States congressional delegations from Connecticut! Other featured lists in this vein include Utah, Indiana, and Hawaii. Lots of what I've written is of the same style as the Connecticut article. Thanks for taking a look, and I appreciate any and all feedback y'all give! Staraction (talk | contribs) 15:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "Each state elects two senators to serve for six years, and varying members of the House" - obviously each state elects varying members, they don't all elect the same ones. I think what you mean is "Each state elects two senators to serve for six years, and varying numbers of members of the House"
• "The current dean, or longest serving member, of the Arizona delegation is" => "The current dean, or longest serving member, of the Arizona delegation, is"
• "of its two senators, one Democrat and one independent, and its nine representatives: 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats." - odd that you write all the numbers as words and then suddenly switch to digits at the end......
• "Of those, Martha McSally and Kyrsten Sinema have been the first and only women" - I think "the only women" would suffice, as if they are the only ones than by definition they were also the first
• "such that each election, around one-third of the seats in the Senate are up for election" => "such that at each election around one-third of the seats in the Senate are up for election"
• "Following 1940 census" => "Following the 1940 census"
• "Following 1960 census" => "Following the 1960 census" (and so on for all the others)
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:40, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Hi! Thanks for your feedback! I've done everything except for the second bullet point. Wouldn't "or longest serving member" be a parenthetical clause; thus removing it leaves "The current dean of the Arizona delegation is" vs. "The current dean of the Arizona delegation, is"? I feel like the first option makes more grammatical sense. Let me know if I'm missing something or if there's more. Thanks again for reviewing! Staraction (talk | contribs) 04:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Yeah, ignore that one, I don't know what I was thinking there. One thing I didn't pick up on before, though: "Seven women have served Arizona in the House, including Kyrsten Sinema and Martha McSally, who are the only women who have served Arizona in the Senate" - doesn't that sentence contradict itself? Seven women have served in the House, including two who served in the Senate? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  It was a little bit weird to phrase and I don't think it came out properly. Sinema and McSally both served in the House prior to serving in the Senate, and they are the only women to have ever served in the Senate. Is there a better way to phrase that? Thanks! Staraction (talk | contribs) 14:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • How about "Seven women have served Arizona in the House, including Kyrsten Sinema and Martha McSally, who also served the state in the Senate, the only women to do so"........? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Sounds good, thank you! Staraction (talk | contribs) 19:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MPGuy2824

• "The first woman to serve Arizona in the Senate was Isabella Greenway." - House of Representatives, not Senate.
• the current senator table is missing colscopes. Also its first header needs to be made into a table caption
• In the full senate table, you don't need to bold the Congress since that is a header cell in every row. This should be checked for the other tables as well.
• There is also no need of setting the height. The height anyway expands to more than 2em when there is less space. This probably holds true for other tables as well. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:49, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @MPGuy2824 Hi, thanks for your feedback! All should be fixed. Staraction (talk | contribs) 03:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Support on prose and table accessibility. I fixed a few minor accessibility issues in some of the tables. You can keep those in mind when you prep your next FL. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @MPGuy2824 @Staraction Sorry, I reverted these edits because the table wasn't displaying terms right. In my experience the 2ems are needed because otherwise mid-term changes don't show correctly, though I don't know if there's a better way to fix them. I'll put the other changes back once I have more time though. Emk9 (talk) 20:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of forest-inventory conifers in the United States

Nominator(s): - Dank (push to talk) 23:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Next up: US conifers. Licensing information for the images (there are a lot of them) will be up shortly on the list talk page. (Part of your reviewing work is already done here, since some rows are almost identical to the ones at WP:Featured list candidates/List of forest-inventory conifers in Canada/archive1 ... if you sort on the 3rd column, these rows will be displayed first.) Once again, there's some basic information here about some trees that are common in North America (and many are common in temperate zones around the world). Feedback is welcome. - Dank (push to talk) 23:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pseud 14

• Support on prose. Found nothing that require further improvement. Another great list! Pseud 14 (talk) 14:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thx much! - Dank (push to talk) 15:26, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Reviewed the additions and changes to the list that Dank has notified me about. No changes in my declaration above. Pseud 14 (talk) 20:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MPGuy2824

• Pinus palustris: "A forest" OR "Forests" instead of "Forest". Also change the "have" to "has", if the singular is more appropriate. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done. - Dank (push to talk) 14:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @MPGuy2824:, in case you wanted a ping. - Dank (push to talk) 17:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Support promotion. Couldn't find any other issues with the prose. A few of the ref are missing their archive links, though. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 01:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: I've relied on IABot for this when I've been asked before ... I did the run and checked "Add archives to all non-dead references", and it claimed the run was successful ... but it found no references that it wanted to add archive links to. I'm not seeing any evidence here that the bot is having problems. Not sure what to do. - Dank (push to talk) 15:14, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(FWIW, it's very unlikely that https://plants.usda.gov is going to disappear without a trace anytime soon.) - Dank (push to talk) 15:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawing support until I can go through the merged list again. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• You can rethink the "Key" section since the lists are now merged.
• It seems odd that Abies concolor "Grows best, ... in the mid-latitudes of California's Sierra Nevada.", but its distribution doesn't include California.
• Some of the "Uses" end with a full-stop, some don't. I think they should all be removed.
• Wikilink "Mississippi River states".

Going with "except for ... states bordering the river".

• "one specimen was found to be 1650 years old." It would be nice to get an online citation for this fact.
• "sometimes living 500 years or more" add an online citation for this one as well.
• "principle provider of timber" to "principal provider of timber"
• Sometimes the "Uses:" sentence is a different paragraph, sometimes not. Please make it consistent.
• Wikilink the first usage of "subalpine".

In a sortable table, either all need to be linked or none (although as a practical matter, that means it's best to find an excuse to link it once somewhere above all the rows of the table). There were two, I linked both.

• That's all I got. Please ping me here when you are done. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:22, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Thanks, all done, but you might want to wait until I add the eastern-only species before you take another look. - Dank (push to talk) 15:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ping me here when you finish merging. I wrongly assumed you were done with that. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 16:01, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Okay, that's done. If it helps: the rows that were added were copied from the current version of User:Dank/List of forest-inventory conifers east of the Mississippi. (Another way to identify them is: they're the ones with no distribution data on western states.) - Dank (push to talk) 19:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Oops I saved the ping wrong. Repinging in case that didn't work. - Dank (push to talk) 19:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I found it easier to go through a diff:

• Pinus rigida: "The wood which is resinous and rot-resistant,"
• "into baskets and drums by the Indigenous peoples of California." - Get a second opinion on this.
• That's all I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Done. - Dank (push to talk) 04:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support promotion of the merged list on prose and table accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My comments on List of forest-inventory conifers east of the Mississippi apply here as well. With the substantial overlap, the unusual limitation of the distribution within each list, and the fact that a division based on the Mississippi River does not appear to be in the sources, I would oppose these lists being separate FLs. List of conifers of the United States would make more sense as a title. Reywas92^Talk 17:14, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reywas92: Okay, that's done. For a discussion of the page title, see User talk:PresN#List of forest-inventory conifers in the United States. - Dank (push to talk) 19:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of general elections in Botswana

Nominator(s): 48JCL (talk) 17:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Botswana is a country located in sub-Saharan Africa. It is usually referred to as one of the most democratic countries in this region, however not much attention is given to this country. Currently, WP:BOTSWANA does not have any FLs so I think having one would be nice. 48JCL (talk) 17:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by RunningTiger123

• "terms; and" – to be a correct compound sentence, should be "terms, and" or "terms;" (no "and")
• Need a key to list all party abbreviations in the table
• References column should not be sortable
• Not a full source review, but just from a quick glance ref. 27 seems questionable as a WP:SPS – what makes it reliable?

@RunningTiger123:, according to the AceProject that created the website, the data is compiled from EISA data, the United Nations, and more.

• Would be nice to see some citation cleanup (e.g., "www.cia.gov" is fine for the website name but not the page title)
  • At the very least, every citation should have the correct page title and a website/publisher name
• No need to apply double bold font to gallery heading
• What is the source for the data used in the maps in the gallery? (Doesn't need to be noted here but should be noted on the image description pages)

@RunningTiger123: pinging @FelipeRev: who created the images.48JCL TALK 17:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

— RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:46, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@48JCL: Please do not mark my comments as resolved. Right off the bat, the double bolding was not fixed and several references are still misformatted (refs. 31 and 40 are immediately obvious). If I think the issues have been resolved, I'll give an indication of that myself. RunningTiger123 (talk) 19:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RunningTiger123, I have added page numbers and fixed bare url errors. 48JCL TALK 02:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by CMD

• The lead feels a bit jumbled, not seeing a lot of coherence in the subject. Off the top of my head, there should be a clear paragraph on what the elections actually do, which is elect representatives to the National Assembly of Botswana (not currently mentioned?) and its predecessors. Following that, information about the President makes more sense. A paragraph on the Dominant-party system under the Botswana Democratic Party makes sense as well, but it would be nice for a more long-scale framing than talking only about the most recent polls. The lead is missing coverage of the timing of the elections, a note on why the seat number increased over time, as well as a summary of the voting and constituency systems. The information on suffrage could be slightly expanded. CMD (talk) 04:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Chipmunkdavis, I would like to withdraw this nomination Is there any way to ping a FLC coordinator? 48JCL TALK 21:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not sure I'm afraid, not one of my usual haunts, but it's an interesting topic that I hope can continue to be developed. CMD (talk) 01:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of historic places in Gore District

Nominator(s): Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 18:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another one on my goal to (a long, long time down the line) get a list of the Heritage New Zealand historic places for each of the 67 territorial authorities of New Zealand. Poor Gore is one of the smallest districts by population, and it shows; there are only 6 entries in the district, while neighboring Clutha and Southland have 65 and 44 respectively. Nevertheless, this wouldn't make sense as part of anything else, so out of the interests of completeness, I bring it here! Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 18:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Driveby cmt by Queen of Hearts

Is there any particular reason for a SFN to the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act? It isn't citing multiple sections and all the other cites are long. Thanks, Queen of Hearts (talk) 18:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I did it that way on my other, but you're right that it's not strictly necessary. I'll change it to a long cite. - G
• Initial comment: The other articles in Category:Lists of historic places in New Zealand include a column for images. I'd recommend the same here. Reywas92^Talk 18:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

Source review: Passed

• Reliable enough for the information being cited
• Consistent date formatting
• Consistent and proper reference formatting
• Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
• Sources match what they are being cited for

Feedback:

• Ref 1 – Add |via=Internet Archive
• Change the column header from "Citation" to ((abbr|Ref.|Reference))
• Gore Presbyterian Church row – Partway through the paragraph the text starts on a new line. Not noticable until I try to sort the columns, but it is an issue.
• Move the first image in the list below the use dmy dates template
• I recognize the source may capitalize "(Former)", but it's not a proper name and should be downcased to "former".
• You should run IABot to add some archive links
• Ref 5 – Should the title be "Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014" instead of "Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act"? The source looks like it includes "2014" in the title.

Overall, I found no issues with the reliability or formatting of references. Please ping me when you reply. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Generalissima: Note that I tweaked by feedback for ref 1 and an additional piece of feedback that was based on the bibliography that you converted to a reference. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh: Okay, I think i fixed everything! IABot hasn't ran yet, but I told it to. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 14:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:05, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• Lead image could be made larger
• "Former passanger station of the Main South Line" - second word is spelt wrong
• That's all I got - great work!! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:43, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude: Okay! Fixed :) Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 14:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:45, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of cities in Donetsk Oblast

Nominator(s): Dan the Animator 20:06, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did an overhaul of the article a few days ago and I think it's ready for the review process. The Ukrainian language wiki version of the list already has selected list status (which is their equivalent of FL) so don't see why this can't be promoted too. Expect there'll be a few things that can be added and some minor improvements but I'm confident based on the state of the article that I'll be able to get this promoted. Also hoping to use this article as a general framework for additional "list of cities in oblast" articles after the review. Cheers, Dan the Animator 20:06, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thought I'd put my thoughts about this in case it helps future reviewers. While the article as-is I think covers the subject well, I've been considering adding in a column for the establishment years of the cities (which both the Ukrainian and Russian wiki articles have). That said, the main List of cities in Ukraine just sticks with admin. subdivision and population and I also don't want to overload the table with too much info so not sure if this would be a good addition. Also was thinking of adding into the lead a few sentences about which are the oldest cities, that many were created as part of industrialization and are tied to the mining industry, and maybe also some comments about the current status of some of the cities (e.g. the fact that Bakhmut, Mariupol, Avdiivka, etc. have been mostly destroyed during the full-scale invasion) but not sure if it makes sense here since these already fall in the Donetsk Oblast article's scope. Feel free to let me know y'all's thoughts on these and hopefully they help with ideas but happy to make whatever improvements I can to the article! Cheers, Dan the Animator 21:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• No article should start with "this is a list". Take a look at some other FLCs and come up with a more engaging opening sentence.

Before nominating, I tried searching to see if there's other similar list of cities articles that're FL and found this: List of United States cities by population. Not the exam same type of article but it also starts off with "this is a list." If it helps though, I could take out that sentence and reword the next sentence to say: There are currently 52 populated places in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine, that have been officially granted city status...by the Verkhovna Rada, the country's parliament.

That list was promoted over 15 years ago and standards have changed massively since then. Your alternative suggestion sounds good for an opening -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it based on the above. Thanks again ChrisTheDude! :) Dan the Animator 16:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• "As of 1 January 2022, the largest city in the oblast is" => "As of 1 January 2022, the largest city in the oblast was" (2022 was two years ago)

Fixed

• Other verbs in that sentence should also be in past tense

Also fixed

• That's all I got - great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ChrisTheDude! :) Dan the Animator 21:19, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• Drive by comments

• Just like the first comment above saying no article should start with "this is a list", no article should have a reference to the list outside of the list itself. The sentence "The below list shows the English name, Ukrainian name, raion, 2001 census recorded population, 2022 population estimate, and population percent change for each city." does not seem to serve a purpose.

Fixed

• "currently" not needed in first sentence.

Fixed

• What do the numbers in the first column mean? Why is this column there?

Fixed? when overhauling this article, I tried to base it on conceptually similar articles, primarily List of cities in Ukraine and others like List of cities in Australia by population and List of cities in Kansas. From my understanding and the way I've always used it, the column is a type of number ranking which allows readers to sort tables and have number rankings for each row, which can be quiet useful for finding out things like what's the 10th largest city in 2001/2022, how many cities saw 10%+ pop. change, etc. In case it helps, I added one of the template's title options "#" on the top of the column with some extra table code. That said, I saw other list articles such as List of cities in Canada and List of cities in the United Kingdom don't use it so I don't mind taking it out. The template also allows for the title "No." but I think "#" works just the same. Let me know what you think about it though.

• It's not common to have a link to a portal in the see also, would suggest removing both portals from the see also section.

Removed

• Image alts could be more descriptive (for accessibility reasons)

Fixed? Tried to make them more informative but let me know if I should reword/shorten/expand them.

• as could image captions (for example, "the largest city in Donetsk")

same as above

• table completely unsourced, need refs for population columns in header.

Fixed 2022 column; for the 2001 census results, I'm currently searching for a Ukrainian gov. website to add to that column though haven't had luck with finding a gov. source that lists all of them. I'll make sure to send a follow-up update when I find it!

• No need for external links subheading, just external links is fine

Fixed

Normally estimates would not be encyclopedic, but given the extenuating circumstances and lack of any recent census, I suppose this makes sense until the next census? Other than these points above, the article looks quite good! Many of them are vital before being promoted.

Mattximus (talk) 02:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, the Next Ukrainian census doesn't seem like it's happening anytime soon and with the current war, I don't think the statistics would be as useful anyways since they've been changing a lot frequently. Let me know if there's anything else I can do and many thanks Mattximus for all the comments!!! :D Dan the Animator 05:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Looks good, just two outstanding issues. First, it is critical to have a citation for the 2001 census populations, it cannot pass without this. Second, I do like your change to alphabetize the list (that makes it easier to update when the next census actually comes out), but I think the table should not include the number column as it doesn't serve the purpose beyond a count. Since it is a list of cities, the cities column should be the same colour as the headings. Mattximus (talk) 18:45, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Still working on the 2001 census citation but for the number column, I removed it. About the cities column shading, I haven't seen any table in a "List of cities" article that has it like that. I've looked through at least a dozen varied similar articles (also highly recommend checking out this to see how other articles do it) and they all use the same general shading (the only column that gets fully shaded in any of the tables I've seen is the number column (which I removed from this article per above) and not the cities column. Also don't think it would conceptually make sense to have that shading since both the English and Ukrainian name columns are both "cities columns" imo (and they both are exactly the same in functionality/formatting). Let me know though if I'm missing something and thanks again with the comments! :) Dan the Animator 21:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this is a requirement for the nomination, I just checked all featured lists of cities have it. I clicked on one at random: Cantons of Costa Rica which was one I put up for promotion. I know this is a requirement because I was asked to do it many times. Mattximus (talk) 15:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mattximus can you post a link to other, more recent past FLs of cities (as many as you know of)? I don't think the article for Cantons of Costa Rica is a good comparison to this article since the Ukrainian equivalent of that article would be List of hromadas of Ukraine (or Raions of Ukraine depending how you look at it). Would help to see maybe some of the other FLs tho, especially if they're more recent (I noticed your FLN for Costa Rica is from 2016 but was wondering if they'd changed it since then). Thanks!!! Dan the Animator 17:10, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes this has been a policy for at least 8 years (it's in the MOS somewhere), common format for all featured lists in general. You can check out User:Mattximus and click on any of the 45 featured lists of cities/municipalities (the ones with a star beside them), there is also a more comprehensive list when you click on featured lists and scroll to find the cities lists. I clicked randomly to a whole bunch, and can't find any that didn't fit this standard, so I think it is a necessary change. Mattximus (talk) 17:39, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose just for now based on missing citation for the entire 2001 census column (the link failed verification as it has similar but not identical numbers as the table here). And the format for the table seems to be incorrect. Specifically ,city name should be same colour as headings, and tables needs captions (|+ <caption_text>, or |+ <caption_text> if that text would duplicate a nearby section header). Table captions allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables, without having to read all prior text to provide context.). Mattximus (talk) 18:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mattximus: Completely fixed the table/formatting issues. For the citation, would either of these sources (source A, source B) be acceptable? It's alright if not but given the complete 2001 census data increasingly seems like its not available online (and thus would probably be a book citation) and the Ukrainian language wiki page (which has recognized article status) uses the former source (the mashke.org one) in their version of the list, I wanted to ask. Many thanks again with everything and let me know if there's any other issues I can fix (and if the formatting for the table is alright now). Cheers, Dan the Animator 15:42, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Table is completely fixed, good work, but the one last citation problem remains. Is there anyone who can help find where these numbers come from? The links you provided give different numbers, and don't seem to come from any official document. But surely this document exists. Maybe another user has an idea? 19:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

@HappyWithWhatYouHaveToBeHappyWith, Ymblanter, Mupper-san, Shwabb1, Yulia Romero, and Микола Василечко: pinging in case y'all have any advice about this (wasn't sure who to ping so sorry in advance for the bother!!!) Dan the Animator 00:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not particularly well-versed in the discussion, so do forgive if this isn't what is being talked about, but given the fact that mashke.org has an unclear source and (at least according to Firefox for me) has an unsafe connection, I would personally use the numbers included alongside the currently-used sources, as they're official documentation. As citypopulation.de cites mashke.org, I also wouldn't include it.

Perhaps, it would be possible to e-mail Mr. Bespyatov (the owner of mashke.org, judging by the copyright at the bottom) and ask him for a source? Although I'm not quite sure.

Mupper-san (talk) 01:59, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mupper-san! :) I agree with the concerns for the two sources though the only official Ukrainian government source I could find lists the 2001 census results for only 28 of the 50+ cities in the oblast. Also, although my guess is he got the numbers from the physical records in Kyiv, I think contacting Mr. Bespyatov is a great idea! I'll send him an email in a moment and reply here if he follows up. Dan the Animator 04:58, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's on the 2001 census website. Go to Publications, download the file kl_2001.rar under "Кількість та територіальне розміщення населення України" (The number and territorial distribution of the population of Ukraine). Open the file 5.xls, you'll see the breakdown of population by raion/city/urban-type settlement. The data for Donetsk Oblast starts on row 552. Be aware that the names are before the decommunization laws (e.g., Artemivsk instead of Bakhmut). Shwabb1 (talk) 05:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Shwabb1!!!!! :D It worked perfectly and I accessed all the stats (only one of the numbers was off on the article thankfully tho). @Mattximus: I think that about finishes everything? Take a look and let me know if there's anything else to do. Dan the Animator 17:57, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Overall looks good, I only see two small mistakes: Krasnoarmiysk should be Krasnoarmiisk using official romanization (per WP:UAPLACE), and in the first citation "urban-type settlements" are mistranslated as "towns". Shwabb1 (talk) 01:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good now I will strike the oppose. I think there should be a heading "notes" just like references below and the note can go there instead of floating kind of below the table. I think the format of the reference needs a bit of work (I believe you need filetype for something like a rar?), but nothing here to oppose over. Nice work! Mattximus (talk) 21:57, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mattximus and Shwabb1!!!! :) I think I fixed basically all the above suggestions! For the new reference's formatting tho, I wasn't sure exactly how much needed changing but I added the |format= parameter in with a link to RAR which hopefully helps (feel free to let me know if there's anything else I can do tho). Dan the Animator 01:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ ((sronly|caption_text)) instead.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! [[City|City name]] becomes !scope=col | [[City|City name]]. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. |[[Amvrosiivka]] becomes !scope=row |[[Amvrosiivka]], on its own line. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --PresN 18:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

  @PresN: Done! The table should be completely fixed now. Let me know if there's any other formatting/other issues that I can fix. Cheers, Dan the Animator 15:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Brooklyn Nine-Nine episodes

Nominator(s): Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 18:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the FLC. I am now nominating as my previous solo nomination has closed. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 18:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "Peretti departed the series in the fourth episode of sixth season" => "Peretti departed the series in the fourth episode of the sixth season" Done
• "During the course of the seconds season" => "During the course of the second season" Done
• "which aired on September 27" => "which began airing on September 27" (the whole season didn't air on that one day) Done
• "The fourth season aired on September 20" - same again Done
• "The eighth and finale season" => "The eighth and final season" Done
• "Season one, was initially given" - no reason for that comma there Done
• Something seems to have wonky with the season one column headings Done
• "Season three aired on September 27, 2015" - as per above Done
• "The fourth season aired on September 20, 2016" - same again Done
• "The season was the final to air Fox" => "The season was the final to air on Fox" Done
• "The eight and finale season aired two episodes a week" => "The eighth and final season aired two episodes a week" Done
• Hitchcock's forename is spelt wrong in the webisodes section Done
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:40, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @ChrisTheDude: Adressed. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 20:48, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Did you definitely publish all your changes? I am still seeing "Season three aired on September 27, 2015" and "The fourth season aired on September 20, 2016"...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      Yes Imissed season 3 but not season four. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 08:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      • Still seeing "The fourth season aired on September 20, 2016". Might be worth doing another sweep and check that all the comments marked as done above were actually addressed...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

        My mistake I was only looking at the lead. Addressed Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 15:00, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:53, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sgubaldo

• Refs. 29-31 are all tagged as permanent dead links. Done
• Refs. 62, 66, 99-106 and 123-131 have TV by the Numbers as publisher instead of website. Done
• 'Tv series finale' ==> 'TV Series Finale' on Ref. 173
• "On May 13 the Fox canceled the series; the following day, NBC picked up the series" ==> "On May 13, Fox cancelled the series; it was picked up by NBC the following day" Done
• Ref. 34 is missing a retrieval date Done
• Also on Ref. 34, the date is marked June 9, 2020 but checking the ref shows June 4. Done
• "The season was the final to air on Fox." ==> "This season was the final one to air on Fox." Done
• Ref. 147 is missing an archive link and the current url is dead. Done
• Not strictly essential, but there's several sources whose current url is live that don't have an archive link: Refs. 1-6, 8-34, 36, 173 and 175-179.

Sgubaldo (talk) 11:59, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sgubaldo: I have addressed the above with the exception of the last one which I'm having trouble with. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 01:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing: the production codes are sourced to here, but I can't see them anywhere in the source? Sgubaldo (talk) 12:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sgubaldo: Their there in the first row. The episode number = prod code. For instance me time is sixth episode produced fourth to air so its production code is 106. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 18:48, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Three more:

• Refs. 95, 96 and 142 are all missing TV by the Numbers as the website. Done
• Wikilink TV by the Numbers in Ref. 147. Done
• Refs. 165 and 166 need to comply with MOS:ALLCAPS. Done

I trust these will be done, so I'm happy to Support. Sgubaldo (talk) 18:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of myosoricines

Nominator(s): PresN 02:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Mammal list #39, and we have a short breather in the order Eulipotyphla: shrews part 2! Soricidae (shrews) may be ~400 species in three subfamilies, but of course it's not split evenly, so our middle list here only has 25 little shrews. These guys are the cleverly-named African shrews, because... they're all in Africa. They're again all pretty similar, and mostly don't have pictures, because they're tiny little things that burrow around under leaves in the forest eating bugs all day. In any case, this follows all the conventions we've built up over the last dozens of FLCs, and should be good to go. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 02:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

• Support - I found nothing to quibble about :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

Source review: Passed

• Reliable enough for the information being cited
• Consistent date formatting
• Consistent and proper reference formatting
• Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
• Spot checks on 14 sources match what they are being cited for
• Assumed good faith on sources that I did not have access to

Usually I'm too intimidated by the size of these species lists to give it a go, but this one is comparatively short. Found no issues so I support promotion. Great work as always PresN! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pseud 14

• May have made the same comment on another FLC you nominated earlier. Regarding the ecosystems shrublands, grasslands, and wetlands, perhaps consider linking for those who are unfamiliar. Other than that, nothing preventing me from supporting another solid work from you. Pseud 14 (talk) 14:52, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• You did; now done (and done for the next couple of lists to be nominated). --PresN 15:10, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Listed buildings in Sleaford

Nominator(s): Noswall59 (talk) 10:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sleaford is a small town in the rural English East Midlands. It's not particularly well known, but it has over 180 buildings that have been "listed", which means they've been officially designated architecturally, culturally or historically significant. They include the remains of a castle, a pub named after bull-baiting, a building which one critic called a "puzzle", and one of the longest brick industrial facades in the UK. A lot of the other listed buildings are more modest, but they come together into an pretty, quintessential English market town. Based on similar FLs like Runcorn's, this list summarises all of Sleaford's listed buildings. The lead introduces Sleaford and explains the listing process, while placing the more notable specimens within the context of the town's historical development. Sortable, reliably sourced, well-written and comprehensive, I believe it meets (or very nearly meets) the criteria to be featured. Technical terms inevitably crop up; they are linked on first use and I have sought to minimise them where possible.

Note: I have scoured the internet for free images of the listed buildings, but the majority are not photographed in a way compatible with Wikipedia's licensing requirements. This is a shame and something I want to rectify in the long term, but I am not in a position to photograph them myself at this time – and, thankfully, the really interesting buildings are illustrated in the article. —Noswall59 (talk) 10:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ ((sronly|caption_text)) instead.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Name becomes !scope=col | Name. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row (the name, in this case), which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | Vicarage becomes !scope=row | Vicarage (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @MPGuy2824: really helpful. I believe I've done this through this edit. —Noswall59 (talk) 12:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Please see the third bullet point above. You need to make the name cell in every row a header cell (it should start with a '!' instead of a '|'). -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: I've now done this -- is it okay now? —Noswall59 (talk) 14:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Yup, that is fine. I found another issue though. While sorting the grade column, "II" sorts between "I" and "II*". -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Good catch -- I've fixed it now. Thanks, —Noswall59 (talk) 09:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Support promotion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. —Noswall59 (talk) 14:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Drive-by comment

• Notes which are not complete sentences, eg "A two-storey rendered building", do not need full stops -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent catch, @ChrisTheDude: I've removed extraneous full-stops here. —Noswall59 (talk) 12:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Comments by Support from KJP1

First off - it's a lovely list and, having read through, I'm looking forward to commenting. This I will have to do in batches, so feel free either to respond as I go along, or wait until I've finished, at which point I shall ping you. I do have two initial thoughts:

Bluelinking

• Most of the Grade IIs are unlikely ever to have their own articles, given the difficulty of finding sources for such buildings. As such, I wonder whether it would be better to link them to their main articles, assuming they have such. The best examples are the fifteen listings beginning with the Eastern Cartshed (Ref 110). They all relate to Bass Maltings, Sleaford and many (all?) are actually mentioned in that article. So I wonder whether they could be bluelinked to the Maltings. Another example would be the three (lodge/stable/wall) all related to Westholme House. Again, could they be linked? With a minor tweak to that article, they could all actually be mentioned there. To give you an idea of what I mean, I've tweaked the Westholme House article. If it doesn't appeal, feel free to revert. I'm thinking of this in relation to Criterion 5a, Redlinking. While I appreciate you haven't red-linked them, they could be. Anyways, see what you think.

• Excellent idea: I've linked all the Bass-related links to the Maltings article. I've also linked the Westholme-related ones to Westholme House and the two ones related to the Navigation to Sleaford Navigation (archway and Navigation House).

Accessibility

• In relation to 5c, while the list reads fine on my laptop/ipad, it doesn't read/look so good on my phone. This is because the lengthy Notes column gives me huge amounts of white space in the left-hand columns. There may well be nothing that can be done about this, but someone more technically-minded than I may have a fix.

• Agree, but I'm also not sure what if anything can be done.

So, I shall now go through, leaving comments. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 08:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

• Note 1 contains an embedded External Link, to this, [The Local Government (Successor Parishes) Order 1973]. I'm no MoS expert, but Wikipedia:EXTERNAL suggests "External links normally should not be placed in the body of an article". I wonder if this would be better as a Reference?

• I've formatted this as a reference now. There is Template:Cite legislation UK, but that formats in CS2 not CS1 which is used for the rest of the article, so I've manually formatted the citation to match everything else on the page.

• There are a couple expressions of opinion, "a particularly fine example of England's Decorated Gothic", "William Alvey's fine Baroque house". I wonder if these should be supported by cites?

• I've added citations to them both

List

• Former Maltings - I think Bass & Co. should be linked. Re. cite 23, does it actually support the stated text? I know the Maltings is/was on the At Risk list, but I don't think this cite actually says that.

• The BBC article says "English Heritage has welcomed plans to renovate the largest building on its industrial heritage at risk register."

• Better still, I've linked to the at-risk register too.

• Manor House, Rhodes House - I think the url for Rotberg (cite 26) is wrong, as it's taking me to the Book of Sleaford. And I wonder whether Rhodes, whom I'd probably term an imperialist rather than a colonialist and he is the main illustration for that article, and Frank's learning to ride there is a bit of a detail too far.

• I did think it tinkered on the edge of trivia; removed, and also removed Rotberg from the bibliography

• Town Hall (Sessions House) - I think this is more accurately described as "Gothic Revival" rather than "Gothic", and there is an excellent bluelink! Secondly, I'm confused by "the ground level is arcaded with six-pointed arches". I don't presently have access to Pevsner, but isn't it actually "six pointed arches, i.e. there are 6 of them, rather than they are six-pointed? The HE listing has "6 4-centred arches to Market Place".

• Linked and excellent catch - my bizarre mistake on the arches

• Vicarage - "beneath a large gable with timber oversails" - although they're both technical terms, I wonder of jetties might be the more commonly-understood of the two?

• Good call - changed

• Garden house at the Pines - would this be a useful bluelink?

• Yes, I think so: done

• Old Place - more of a query, but it relates to my Bluelinking comment above. This, the Vicarage and Carre's Hospital are the only redlinks. I'm wondering about the rationale. Is it that you think/intend these will get independent articles, but the others likely won't?

• In short, I think there's enough for articles to be written about them. There's definitely enough written about Old Place and Carre's Hospital to justify GA-quality articles for them both, I just haven't got round to making them yet (both have recently had books written about them by local historians); I am less certain of the vicarage, but there is probably scope; if not, it could have an section in St Denys's article and be linked to that.

• Old Place Cottages: 1-2 Boston Road - "coursed-stone" - is this, Course (architecture) not a suitable bluelink?

• Yes, done

• Old Place Cottages: 10-12 Boston Road - "shopfronts" - Façade would seem a suitable bluelink.

• Done

• Former office building in centre of yard formerly occupied by Hubbard and Phillips Ltd - cite 50 is giving me a "Fail to load" error on Wayback, although the original works.

• Me too. I've manually generated a new archive link which is working for me.

Thanks so much @KJP1: I look forward to the remainder of your comments. Cheers, —Noswall59 (talk) 10:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

[continuation]

• 1 Eastgate - "A one-storey building (with a gabled attic) in coarse rubble" - I think this is "coursed rubble".

• Done

• 26 Jermyn Street - "There is datestone of 1793; it was owned by a tanner" - it needs a definite article and you could link tanner, thus "There is a datestone of 1793; it was owned by a tanner".

• both done

• 1-6 Kingston Terrace - Marmaduke Bennison, great name, guy certainly warrants an article! But HE call his style 'Jacobean' (their single quote marks), so I wonder if Jacobethan would be a more appropriate link.

• Changed

• Garden wall to the rear of former stables to Westholme - I'm guessing from the dates that this is another work of Charles Kirk the Younger, and this should probably be specified.

• The register doesn't say "the younger", but as the elder died in 1847 and the building is dated c. 1850, I have added the epithet

• Redcroft - "The right and rear sides of the building have a bay windows" - the "a"'s not necessary.

• Done

• Bristol Arcade - worth linking "Marquess of Bristol"?

• Done

• Drinking fountain - another that I'd call Gothic Revival rather than Gothic.

• Done

• Lock-up in north-east corner of Churchyard - "which served as St Denys' Church's lock-up". While I appreciate that the lock-up is located in the churchyard, I'm not sure it can properly be described as the church's lock-up? As far as I'm aware, such Village lock-ups were administered by local judicial, magistrates etc., rather than ecclesiastical authorities. The source suggests it was operated by the "parish authorities", although it does say the vicar later bought it because he didn't like it! Presumably, he then closed it?

• I've changed this to remove reference to the church and link to village lock-up; I think the HE list is less reliable about its past use than the local history work, so will use "town's lock-up".

Need to break off now, done as far as the lock-up. Will pick up later. KJP1 (talk) 11:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, I've made all the changes requested so far. I appreciate you taking the time to review this in such depth. —Noswall59 (talk) 11:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

[continuation]

• War memorial - "Major H. A. Peake" - this is one where we can only go with what the source says, and I can't access cite 135, but our article on Bawtry Hall, and some other sources, not all RS, [1][2], call him Major George Peake.

• Short story: this is sorted now. Long story: the sources were not clear about what was going on here, so I had a deeper dig. I knew that the Peakes had lived at Westholme but left the town in the 1920s, so thought (when the source was vague) that it was Mrs H. A. Peake's husband Herbert Peake who was at Bawtry; having now tracked down the local paper, I have found that Herbert and his wife were still at Westholme and that it was his brother G. H. (George) Peake who was at Bawtry and who gave the address in Herbert's place when Mrs Herbert Peake unveiled the ceremony. According to Herbert Peake's obituary (he died in 1923), he was so devastated by the loss of his three sons that he retired from public life; this probably explains why George gave the address instead. A very sad story. And now disentangled -- an excellent spot on your part, and exactly why this process is so useful.

• 5 and 6 Market Street - "Nos 5 to 6 spans three storeys" - super picky but as it's two houses, should it be a plural "span"?

• Done

• 7 Market Street - again, apologies for the pickiness but, for me, cite 144 is actually more of an explanatory Note rather than a Citation and would sit better in the Notes section.

• Moved to note form

• 17 Market Place - "across three stories" - rather, "across three storeys".

• Done, oops

• Carre's Charity - another where I'd go for Gothic Revival, rather than Gothic.

• Done

• Lloyds Bank - "by Alvey Darwin" - I can't access the source but given he inherited it from William Alvey, are we certain his name is this way round, rather than Darwin Alvey? Your might also link armorial bearings.

• No, his name was actually Alvey Darwin; he was a relative of the naturalist -- the source calls him "Alvey Darwin", but he was presumably the William Alvey Darwin (1726–1783) of New Sleaford in this tree, uncle of Charles, and son of Robert Darwin and his wife Elizabeth, daughter of John Hill of Sleaford and presumably through her somehow a relative of perhaps godson of William Alvey who built the house. (Also, I've linked armorial bearings)

• Parry's Court (3/4/5 Northgate) - "The doorways are under Tudor arches" - given they aren't actually Tudor, perhaps "Tudor-style" or "Tudorbethan?

• Done -- and corrected in one other place too.

• 27–29 and attached gateway to 25 - "with Doric columns" - if you haven't already, and you may have done, it's a long list!, I'd link Doric. Also, I'm not sure "their firm's successor's offices are still at 27 to 29 Northgate as of 2024", particularly "firm's successor's offices", quite flows. Perhaps, "As of 2024, their successors still operate from the building" or something similar?

• Doric is already linked further up. I've changed the wording to the one you suggested.

• 23–27 Southgate - "pantile roof" - has pantile been linked before?

• Yes, on its first usage.

• White Hart Hotel - "The Hotel closed and has been an office since 2011" - lower case "h" for hotel.

• Done

• The Ivy - "it was renamed Beer and Bean", "the Beer and Bean", unless it self-consciously eschewed the definite article?

• Done

• Sleaford railway station - there's another "stories" that needs to be "storeys"

• Done, oops again

• Westgate House - "used as their birth, marriage and death register office", would "used as their births, marriages and deaths register office" be the more commons usage?

• I've simplified to "used as their register office"

Notes

• Note 5 - aside from wondering whether we really need this level of detail, and why it's a Note within a Note, i.e. Note 6, was it ECS (the company) that was bought by MRI or their Qube software product? But, either way, I'm not sure it's very relevant to the building.

• I'd argue that the detail is okay for a footnote; it's a substantial, well-known house which has had some locally important owners, but it's also not had enough written about it yet to sustain its own article. I'd rather keep the ownership history here and a note keeps it uncluttered while giving interested parties the facts. Regarding the nested note, I've clarified the relationship between the companies. And I agree it's a bit silly, but I need to cite the fact that the company ECS (who bought the house in 1995) merged into Qube in 2007 and then bought in 2017 by MRI, who then left in 2021; clarifying the link between the companies requires an explanation.

Citations and Bibliography

• These look good to me.

And that's it from me. A lovely list, and who knew Sleaford held such a rich haul of listeds. Certainly not me. You've responded very promptly to my issues to date, and I look forward to Supporting when you've had a chance to review the last batch. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 17:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much – I've gone through and addressed all of your concerns (other than the last point about notes 5 and 6). And, yes, most people even in the Midlands won't have heard of Sleaford, let alone been there. It's not much appreciated, even by a lot of the locals. Sure, it's got a lot of dull suburban housing, it's too congested at rush hour and its High Street shopping has got progressively down market (which town's hasn't?) But it has a quaint little centre and a great church, and on a sunny day the Ancaster stone and red-brick Georgian buildings make it quite pretty. Hopefully this will shine a little more light on all that. Glad you found it interesting. All the best, —Noswall59 (talk) 19:05, 22 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Sincere apologies, yesterday RL was distracting, today Wiki was the same. All the issues I flagged, most of which were minor, have been promptly addressed. For me, the list meets the FL criteria and I am pleased to Support its promotion. KJP1 (talk) 14:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much -- I appreciate the time it takes to do these reviews. -- Noswall59 (talk) 19:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of roles and awards of Liza Soberano

Nominator(s): Pseud 14 (talk) 22:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After recently expanding the main article of American and Filipino actress Liza Soberano, here's her work and awards list which I have lumped into one article, tailored to FLs like List of roles and awards of Oscar Isaac and List of roles and awards of Catherine Zeta-Jones. Happy to address your comments and thanks to all who take the time to review the list. Pseud 14 (talk) 22:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DBC

• You can remove the notes column from the Film table since all the cells are empty.

I don't think the notes column is ever removed even if empty (i.e. List of James McAvoy performances#Video games, List of roles and awards of Oscar Isaac#Podcasts)

• In the Music videos table, making the "title" column as the header cell in each row would make the table consistent with the other tables in the list. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching this. Done.

@MPGuy2824: thanks for the comments, provided my responses. Pseud 14 (talk) 13:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support promotion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 01:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

Source review: Passed

• Reliable enough for the information being cited
• Consistent date formatting
• Consistent and proper reference formatting
• Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
• Spot checks on 14 sources match what they are being cited for

Feedback:

• Ref 31 should use News.ABS-CBN.com instead of ABS-CBNnews.com
  • • Done
• Under the Awards and nominations table...
  • 2016 row for Star Awards for Movies, link 2016 to 32nd PMPC Star Awards for Movies
    • Linked
  • Rows for Star Awards for Television, link "Best Drama Actress" to PMPC Star Award for Best Drama Actor and Actress
    • Didn't even know this article exists, thanks for catching. Linked now.
  • 2013 row for Star Awards for Television, link "Best Female New TV Personality" to PMPC Star Award for Best New TV Personality
    • Linked
  • Several of the rows – If the column is titled recipient(s) and nominee(s), why is it mentioned in a note under the category column that the award is shared with Enrique Gil instead of directly in the recipients column?
    • I think from what I've seen in most awards list is that if the table pertains to the subject, we generally put them as the recipient, and indicate in an note if the win was shared or tied with another performer. (some examples I referenced are List of awards and nominations received by Anne Hathaway, List of awards and nominations received by Jessica Chastain)
• Discography table
  • Is there any reason you don't re-link Doice Amore and Star Music? I understand this is a small table, but you often include duplicate links, which is of course allowable and perfectly acceptable in a number of these tables, but I'm asking for the sake of consistency across all tables in the article.
    • Thanks for raising this. Since the table is not sortable (because it is small), there is no need to repeat the link. Repeat linking only applies for sortable tables (as the sorting order would have changed depending on which column)

Good job! Ping me when you reply please. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments and doing the source review Hey man im josh. All actioned and responses provided. Let me know if there's anything I may have missed or needs changing. Pseud 14 (talk) 19:50, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Good stuff Pseud! Hey man im josh (talk) 20:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dank

• Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
• Additional disclaimer: I can't read Tagalog.
• Checking the FLC criteria:
• 1. I did some minor copyediting; feel free to revert. I checked sorting on all sortable nonnumeric columns and sampled the links in the tables.
• 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
• 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
• 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
• 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, and it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find).
• 4. It is navigable.
• 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
• 6. It is stable.
• Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 23:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support Dank. Appreciate your review and edits. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "for which she received the award for Most Promising Female Star at 2015 Box Office Entertainment Awards" => "for which she received the award for Most Promising Female Star at the 2015 Box Office Entertainment Awards"

Thanks for catching this. Done

• "and a woman conflicted of her feelings between two men" => "and a woman conflicted by her feelings for two men"

Done

• That's all I got - great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:01, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review ChrisTheDude. All comments actioned. Let me know if there's anything I may have missed. Pseud 14 (talk) 23:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Michelin starred restaurants in Mexico

Nominator(s): (CC) Tbhotch^™ 20:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because... a few days ago, Michelin added Mexico to its list of destinations. Since there aren't any featured Michelin lists, I had to establish a standard. Yearly, the list will be static, and new restaurants will be updated if they receive or lose stars accordingly. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 20:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MPGuy2824

• Its a bit weird to have three different ways to show the same information (color, symbol and stars). I suggest that you move the color to the star column and remove the symbols used. Instead you can use a single symbol for the taco stand, since it is a rarer quality.
• The main table is missing its caption. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I think I did it. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 07:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • There is one spanish ref. You should tag it with "lang=es".
  • "Eleven Mexican food restaurants worldwide have one Michelin star, and two have two, he added" Somehow indicate that this is only outside Mexico. The number increases when the restaurants in Mexico are counted too. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Done. Thanks. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 18:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support promotion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• I'd be tempted to just go with the Quintonil image. The top picture just shows some unremarkable concrete steps and there's nothing in the picture to indicate that it even is a restaurant
• "The Michelin Guides have been published [.....] It was designed as a guide" - jumps from plural to singular
• "forcing drivers to replace them as they wore out" - I think "by encouraging drivers to use their cars more and therefore need to replace the tires as they wore out" would get the point across better
• "Likewise, the stars are not permanent" - no reason for the word "likewise" there
• "Michelin awarded a Mexican taco stand, Taquería El Califa de León, for the first time" - the "for the first time" bit reads a bit weirdly, as obviously if the inspectors never visited Mexico before this year it would have been physically impossible for them to have awarded stars to any Mexican taco stands previously
• "Eleven Mexican food restaurants worldwide have one Michelin star, and two have two, he added" => "he added that eleven Mexican food restaurants worldwide have one Michelin star, and two have two"
• That's what I got. Always nice to see an FLC in a new subject area :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done. Thanks. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 18:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source Review

I'll take this source review ref numbers from this revision.

• Ref 1 Good
• Ref 2 Good
• Ref 3 Good
• Ref 4 seems to be sindicated from a non yahoo source titled Robb Report. Originally found here [3]
• Ref 5 Good
• Ref 6 Good
• Ref 7 Good
• Ref 8 Good

• for the ref collom use something like

!scope="col" class="unsortable"| ((Ref heading)) instead of what's currently in use

Everything archived and seems reliable. Dating is consistent. Ping me once you can address the concern. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:34, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@OlifanofmrTennant: Done. Thanks. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 20:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 20:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support, assuming other editors' concerns are addressed. Nice to have a template FL for a list of Michelin-starred restaurants. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:41, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of principals of Somerville College, Oxford

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's that guy known for all those dozens of popular music lists, back yet again with an FLC on.......higher education??? I decided to step outside my comfort zone for once and, inspired by IntGrah's excellent work on List of masters of Trinity College, Cambridge, work on this one. My connection with this particular institution is that my son currently studies there, but I am reasonably certain that that doesn't count as a WP:COI :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For me it was because I saw Jesus College Oxford was a featured topic—and so the rivalry continues... Nice work! IntGrah (talk) 07:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LOL :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MPGuy2824

• "a limit on the numbers of students which the women's colleges could recruit": "admit" would work better than "recruit".
• The cells of the header row are missing their scopes.
• A cropped version of Fiona Caldicott's image can be used.
• "(2008–2010) then Leader of the Opposition in the House of Lords". A comma before the "then" would work better, imo.
• I'm unsure if the peerage title needs to be mentioned for the current principal, in the table.
• That's all I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @MPGuy2824: - thanks for your review. All done apart from the last one. The name used here matches her article title and is the one she uses in public life including her capacity as principal ([4]) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Good justification. Support promotion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pseud 14

• Great work branching out to a new subject area. No others comments on prose. Support for promotion. Pseud 14 (talk) 17:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sgubaldo

• Add the doi to Refs 7, 9, 10, 12, 14 and 19,
• For Ref. 20, add '– Somerville College' after 'Emily Penrose' to keep it consistent with its usage in the other sources.

I can't see any other issues. Support promotion as comments are minor. Sgubaldo (talk) 10:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sgubaldo: - apologies for being dumb, but what is a "doi" and where do I find it for each source? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I should've explained that better. A digital object identifier (doi) is a string of numbers and letters that uniquely identifies a document, usually a journal article. For the references in this article, you can find them just below the author.

For example, for Ref. 9, below 'Enid Huws Jones', you can see https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/34836. The doi here is 10.1093/ref:odnb/34836 and you can add it a WP citation as |doi=10.1093/ref:odnb/34836, producing:

• Huws-Jones, Enid (23 September 2004). "Maitland, Agnes Catherine (1849–1906)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/34836. Archived from the original on 9 May 2024. Retrieved 8 May 2024.

Adding it to the citation produces a link to the article so, to be fair, I can see why it may be redundant with the url already there.

Sgubaldo (talk) 11:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sgubaldo: - thanks for clarifying, that is done now -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

Source review: Passed

• Reliable enough for the information being cited
• Consistent date formatting
• Consistent and proper reference formatting
• Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
• Spot checks on 12 sources match what they are being cited for

I assumed good faith on the sources I did not have access to. Scoured for something to criticize, but I got nothing. Great work Chris! Support. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Football Academic All-America Team Members of the Year

Nominator(s): TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because the progress made during archive1 makes me feel that this should be featured-level with a few minor changes. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Add a "(pictured in <year>)" for Danny Wuerffel since it seems to be from much later in his life. Check the same for the other images as well.

• I just added the feature to all images for consistency-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• You can remove the bolding from the image captions, since the information is already present in the table.
• Support promotion as the above are minor issues, and the first nomination was closed just before I indicated my support there. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• I think "The Football Academic All-America Team Member of the Year is the annual most outstanding singular college football athlete of the set of American football athletes selected for the Academic All-America Teams in a given year." would be a more grammatically correct opening
  • swapped in. Thx.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• "collegiate athletic competition (known as division)s" - why is the s outside the bracket?
  • Fixed.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• "For each division, a set of eight districts were delinieated." - the subject is "set", which is singular, so the verb should be singular ("was"). Also, "delineated" is spelt incorrectly
  • Thx.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• "For the NCAA Division I-level teams, the 2021–22 districts were as follows" - is more up to date info not available?
  • Up to and including 21-22 used a set of districts. Afterwards, districts were cast aside. I have tried to revise the text to better clarify this.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• "In 2022, the All-district selection process" - previously you had a capital D in "All-District"?
  • Fixed.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• "In addition, Tennis and Swimming & Diving were added" - none of these sports are proper nouns so they do not need capital letters
  • Thx.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• "Also, the qualifying G.P.A. was raised" - please write whatever GPA stands for in full with the abbreviation in brackets. I for one have no idea what a "GPA" is
  • Fixed for singular use.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• "was held separately for the college and University Divisions" - inconsistent capitalisaion
  • Thx.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• "From each team one winner for each sport was chosen from both the college and University Divisions" - and again here
  • Got it.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• "Thus, all twelve Academic All-American teams (Men's and women's basketball" - men's does not need a capital M
  • OK.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• "had one Academic All-American of the Year each of its divisions" => "had one Academic All-American of the Year for each of its divisions"
  • Done-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• "while in some sports Two-Year College, Canadian Institutions" - none of these words need capitals apart from "Canadian"
  • Thx.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:26, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• "into the districts for the other 4 sets" => "into the districts for the other four sets"
  • Fixed.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• "only Rob Zatechka had earned this award for Nebraska" => "only Rob Zatechka has earned this award for Nebraska"
  • Thx.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• "amd Mac Jones (2020–21)" - "and" is spelt wrong
  • Fixed.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• "all earned the ovearll award" - "overall" is spelt wrong
  • Thx.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• "Two-time Winners" - "winners" doesn't need a capital
  • I disagree. This is where title case is appropriate.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Why do you have the notes for the winning players within that section yet the notes to the "winners by school" get their own sub-heading? Just move them into the section with the table.
  • OK.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:17, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Also, none of the notes to the "Schools with multiple awards" section are complete sentences, so they should not have full stops.
  • Thx.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • User:ChrisTheDude all done except for the disagreement on title case.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of the 2002 Pacific hurricane season

Nominator(s): Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 03:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the fifth in an ongoing series of hurricane season timeline nominations, and the first from this century. The 2002 season was fair to middling in terms of overall activity, but had a disproportionately high number of major hurricanes – indeed, it managed to generate a record-tying three Category 5 hurricanes. Two of those Category 5s stayed safely out to sea with no impacts to life nor property (the absolute best kind of tropical cyclone), but unfortunately, the third caused immense damage in Mexico when it rammed into the little fishing village of San Blas as a Category 4. That storm, Hurricane Kenna, had its name retired the following spring. Similarly to the subject of my previous nomination, this is a formerly merged timeline that I have given a significant overhaul – it now includes quite a bit of information that was missing from the old version. I eagerly anticipate the community's feedback, and will do my best to swiftly address any concerns. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 03:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• Support since I couldn't find any issues. A couple of the refs are missing their archive links though. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks MPGuy2824! I appreciate you letting me know about the missing archive links—I've just rectified that, which included making a change to a template that generates one of the refs. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 21:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Women's Premier League (cricket) captains

Nominator(s): Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 14:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because it's a well-organized list about a noteworthy topic. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 14:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "In the 2 seasons played, 7 players" => "In the two seasons played, seven players"
• " In the meantime Delhi Capitals's Meg Lanning" - there's no reason for the words "In the meantime" there. Also, there should not be an s after the apostrophe on Capitals'
• "while, Meg Lanning and" - no reason for that comma
• Also, per MOS:SURNAME, only Lanning's surname needs to be used on the second mention of her
• "Despite having won no titles, Harmanpreet Kaur leads" - again, only surname is needed here
• "The following list is arranged by most number of wins in descending order" - no it isn't
• "The ones with the † are currently captaining their sides in the WPL 2024." - already covered by the key above, you don't need to say it again
• The notes should go above the see alsos -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

   Done
  Thanks, I've fixed them except, "The list is initially organised by the number of matches as a captain and if the numbers are tied, the list is sorted by last name." - it is. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 11:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ ((sronly|caption_text)) instead.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Player becomes !scope=col | Player. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. ![[Meg Lanning]]((Dagger)) becomes !scope=row | [[Meg Lanning]]((Dagger)). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --PresN 16:09, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

  @PresN Just one question: Is the !scope= needed for header cells set in the middle of the rows. example: ! 70.58 Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 16:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  There should only be one header cell per row. Header cells should not be used to highlight cells, but only to serve as the "head"/primary cell of each row. --PresN 19:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drive by comments

• Sorting the player column should sort by last name
• The column needs to be renamed as "Name" or "Captain"
• The team name columnshould be just after or just before the captains name column.
• The key table needs to have the same accessibility fixes done that were applied for the captains' table (rowscope, colscope, caption, etc)
• Some of the keys are unnecessary (e.g. Won, Lost, Tied, Win%). -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @MPGuy2824 All done, except the third one: The "Name" column is the row header and should be kept fist, and their nationality comes after. How could I place the Team name next to the player name. also, what caption would be appropriate for the key table. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 09:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • what caption would be appropriate for the key table Looking at one of the nominations before yours, just the word "Key" is enough.
  • The name column still doesn't sort correctly by last name. Sorting it in descending order should show Sciver-Brunt at the top.
  • The row header does not have to be the first column, just the most important cell in that row wrt to the list that it is in.
  • PresN's last comment is also not yet done. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Table is sorted based on number of matches; I'll adjust the columns now. I am still working on PresN'a comment-will be done tonight. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 11:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support promotion. If interest and time permit, please take a look at my FL nom. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:34, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of constituencies of the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly

Nominator(s): -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My fifth FL nom and the third in the constituency series. This time it is a larger list with 230 constituencies. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "As of 2001, it comprises 230 members" - 2001 was more than 20 years ago, so the present tense is not appropriate. Surely there is more up-to-date info available?
• "The 2011 census of India stated that the Scheduled castes and the Scheduled tribes constitute a significant portion of the population of the state" => "The 2011 census of India stated that the Scheduled castes and the Scheduled tribes constituted a significant portion of the population of the state" (past tense, as 2011 was more than 10 years ago). I presume more up-to-date data has not been published?
• "After the independence of India in 1947, the then province of the Central Provinces and Berar, along with a number of princely states merged with the Indian Union, and became a new state" => "After the independence of India in 1947, the then province of the Central Provinces and Berar, along with a number of princely states, merged with the Indian Union and became a new state"
• "The number of constituencies of the legislative assembly of this state was 184. 127 constituencies were single-member, and 48 constituencies were double-member" => "The number of constituencies of the legislative assembly of this state was 184, of which 127 were single-member and 48 were double-member"
• "Madhya Pradesh was reorganized on 1 November 1956, following the States Reorganisation Act, 1956. It was created by merging the old Madhya Pradesh state, Madhya Bharat, Vindhya Pradesh and Bhopal states." => "Madhya Pradesh was reorganized on 1 November 1956, following the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, merging the old Madhya Pradesh state, Madhya Bharat, Vindhya Pradesh and Bhopal states."
• I notice that you use both the US spelling "recognized" and the UK spelling "recognised". I don't know which is the correct spelling in Indian English but whichever it is should be used in all cases.
• That's it, I think! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Switched from "As of 2001," to "From 2001," which is what I meant. I can clarify/reword that statement further, if required.
  • I assume you mean reorganized, not recognized. I've switched to the spelling used in the name of the act: "Reorganisation", which is the UK one. There is still one instance of "Reorganization", but that is from the title of a paper by two US authors.
  • The 2021 census of India hasn't yet taken place. 2011 is the latest completed census.
  • Fixed the rest. Thanks for the review, ChrisTheDude. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of World Heritage Sites in Tunisia

Nominator(s): Tone 20:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tunisia has nine World Heritage sites and 15 sites on the tentative lists. Several ancient cities and Roman remains, as well as desert locations. Standard style. The list for Morocco is already seeing some support so I am adding a new nomination. Tone 20:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if there is a hard-and-fast rule, but I've noticed that nominators wait for 2 (or more) supports on an older nomination before starting a new one. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MPGuy2824

• "because of construction" to "because of the construction" - in the lead and the table
• " resulted in reduction of vegetation and drop in bird numbers" to " resulted in a reduction of vegetation and a drop in bird numbers" - in the lead and the table
• "between the 12th to the 16th centuries" to "between the 12th and 16th centuries"
• wikilink "Islamic world"
• " series of wars until the" to " series of wars, until the"
• wikilink necropolis
• The sentences about minor boundary changes don't seem important to the list.
• "listed endangered" to "listed as endangered".
• "By 2006, the situation has improved" to "By 2006, the situation had improved"
• "As opposed to several Phoenician cities, such as Carthage, Byblos, or Tyre," to "Unlike other Phoenician cities, such as Carthage, Byblos, or Tyre,"
• "The ruins, which date to the 4th and 3th centuries BCE and were discovered in 1952, provide an important insight into the Punic urban planning." to "The ruins, which date to the 4th and 3th centuries BCE were rediscovered in 1952, and provide an important insight into Punic urban planning."
• "under the Aghlabids as a part of" to "under the Aghlabids, as a part of"
• "The medina has been well preserved, with several monuments, including the Ribat, which is both a fortification and a religious building, the Great Mosque (pictured), the kasbah, the Bou Ftata Mosque, and fortifications." - too long and complicated. Please split.
• "important Libyan–Punic settlement which" to "important Libyan–Punic settlement, which"
• "lives here while" to "lives here, while".
• "have been reintroduced" to "were reintroduced".
• "mammals and reptiles and it" to "mammals and reptiles, and it".
• I'll continue later. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing...

• "As opposed to several sections of Roman Limes" to "Unlike several sections of Roman Limes".
• "Sfax was the gateway and the port of Ifriqiya to the Levant." to "Sfax was the port of the Ifriqiya region, and its gateway to the Levant".
• "Geological formation" to "The geological formation" in two entries.
• "extinction event supporting" to "extinction event, supporting".
• A couple of the refs are missing archive links.
• That's all I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks! I am trying to list the boundary modifications, either major (which get extra explanation) or minor, because this is still relevant - it is a list of WHS after all. And it explains why some numbers have bis or ter attached - I've had questions on that before :) Tone 08:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support promotion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:30, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "By 2006 the situation has improved" => "By 2006 the situation had improved"
• "The ruins, which date to the 4th and 3th centuries BCE were discovered in 1952" => "The ruins, which date to the 4th and 3th centuries BCE, were discovered in 1952"
• "The island of Djerba has a semi dry climate" => "The island of Djerba has a semi-dry climate"
• That's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Fixed! Two of these were already mentioned above and I just took care of them :) Tone 09:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  You still have "By 2006 the situation has improved" in the lead...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Right, fixed now :) Tone 14:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bocchi the Rock! discography

Nominator(s): Harushiga (talk) 16:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's something different from my past FLCs: this is about the discography...of an anime series! Bocchi the Rock! is one of the most popular anime of 2022, which led to its song album selling over 100,000 physical copies and all of its songs appearing in music charts in Japan. This is my fourth nomination, and any feedback would be appreciated as always! Harushiga (talk) 16:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DBC

• The "CD singles" table has the non-applicable sentence ' "—" denotes single that did not chart.' Please remove. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:22, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Done. Harushiga (talk) 13:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Tintor2

Sorry for the delay. I'm not good with music articles but I'll see if I can help:

• Shouldn't the first sentence make more heavy emphasis on the discography rather than the origins? "The discography of the anime Bocchi the Rock!...."

Done.

• I'm not sure about the wp:lead in FLs but shouldn't every sentence be referenced? At least you could generalize some parts to avoid referencing specific parts.

Per MOS:CITELEAD, information that is sourced within the body no longer needs citations when mentioned in the lead, which is the case here. I've only sourced those that are not found in the body, such as the voice actresses and to verify that "Seishun Complex" is the opening of the anime.

• "Watashi Dake Yūrei" Shouldn't you include a nihongo format?

Unless it's for the very first sentence in the lead, I find that Japanese titles in prose kind of disrupts the flow of sentences. That is why I added nihongo templates in the tables rather than the lead.

• The body is well formatted. I'm not sure if Japanese titles need a "lit." for the translations though.

The translations are also the official English titles so the "lit." is not necessary.

That's all. Good work with the article. I hope it becomes FL. Ping me once everything is done. @Harushiga: Tintor2 (talk) 21:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Hi, I've addressed your comments above. Harushiga (talk) 13:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. I leave my support. In order to attract more feedback I recommend exchanges like reviewing other articles. I would ask you to Review Musashi Miyamoto (Vagabond) since it was recently nominated by me or Frieren nominated by another user.

Comments

The only thing I have is......

• "A live album recorded from the Kessoku Band Live: Kōsei concert debuted at number one on the Oricon Digital Albums Chart" - is there a source for the fact that it entered at number one? The table shows that it peaked at number one, but that's not necessarily the same thing -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude: Added a source for the debut position. Harushiga (talk) 23:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:27, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of masters of Trinity College, Cambridge

Nominator(s): IntGrah (talk) 06:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating for featured list because...

• expanded the lead to describe the role
• described the Master's lodge building
• highlighted significant developments made by masters of the college
• summarised the notability of each entry on the list
• added related images with alt text

IntGrah (talk) 06:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• Might be worth mentioning at the start that Trinity is part of the University of Cambridge
• "In 1546, Trinity College was founded by Henry VIII, from merging the colleges of Michaelhouse and King's Hall" => "In 1546, Trinity College was founded by Henry VIII, merging the colleges of Michaelhouse and King's Hall"
• " then Warden of King's hall" - shouldn't hall have a capital H, like in the previous sentence?
• "The Façade of the building" - facade isn't a proper noun so it doesn't need a capital
• "Arthur Blomfield expanded the west wing of lodge" => "Arthur Blomfield expanded the west wing of the lodge"
• Great Court is linked twice in the lead
• (Aside) was the second master known informally as Bill Bill? ;-)
• "Vice-Chancellor (1548)" - probably worth making it explicit that he (and others who held this role) was VC of Cambridge, not of some other institution
• That's what I got. Great work! In fact it's inspired me to get out of my comfort zone of music and football and work on a similar article..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done (UoC)
  • Done (Merging the colleges)
  • Done (King's Hall)
  • Done (façade)
  • Done (the lodge)
  • Done (Great Court)
  • Not done (Bill Bill)—Very funny
  • Done (Vice-Chancellor) Wrote "Vice-Chancellor of Cambridge" for each entry. Also did the same for St John's College, Cambridge and Jesus College, Cambridge, which have Oxford colleges of the same name.

  IntGrah (talk) 20:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comments

• John Redman, Robert Beaumont, and Thomas Comber are all disambiguation pages
• You are missing column and row scopes. See PresN's standard comment here for some advice
• A number of these names are unnecessarily preceded by a title, while others who do have titles that match what's included don't show them. Try to match the target page's name instead, minus disambiguators of course.

Hey man im josh (talk) 20:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for spotting; it was a mistake made when switching from Wikilinks to Sortname templates.

Done Row scopes are attached to the names

Done Names now match article titles.

IntGrah (talk) 20:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ ((sronly|caption_text)) instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. |((Sortname|John|Redman|dab=Trinity College)) becomes !scope=row |((Sortname|John|Redman|dab=Trinity College)). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --PresN 20:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MPGuy2824

• "appointmented" to "appointed" OR rewrite the sentence to "The role is an official appointment by the monarch, at the recommendation of the college, ..."
• Some stats about the shortest and longest tenure would be nice in the lead.
• I'll reiterate PresN's point about having a primary cell for each row. I'd recommend the name cell.
• According to [5] William Bill stopped being master of St. John's in 1551, so you can remove the "?" after that year. In the same cell, remove the full stop at the end since this isn't a complete sentence.
• The empty ref column for the second William Bill stint looks odd. You can re-cite the earlier ref. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Done (appointed) I think the version "The role is an official appointment by the monarch..." doesn't allow for the fact that it is only ceremonial nowadays.
• Partially done I added a bit about Richard Bentley, since his long tenure is significant. (He was charged twice by the fellows, but held the role. The first sentencer died, and the second sentence was meant to be executed by the vice-master, whom he was a friend of.) I didn't think it was interesting enough to talk about the shortest term of office though.
• I already have | scope="row" |((Sortname|First|Last)) on each table row, is that enough, or is there a another way to mark these as primary?
• Done (Bill Bill)
• Done (Empty ref)

IntGrah (talk) 00:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of | scope="row" | it should be ! scope="row" | -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure? I didn't see this in other featured lists, and I think putting the picture first is better in this case. I made a test edit for now, but I am under the impression that | scope=... is sufficient for screenreader software. Please correct me if I'm wrong. IntGrah (talk) 09:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PresN: Thoughts? -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It has to be a !. The reason is that, for wikicode, ! means a header cell, and | means a regular cell. Scope tags only work on header cells (since they're identifying the header cell for the row). Note, though, that the header cell, oddly, doesn't actually need to be the first cell in the row, so if you want the picture column to be the first one then that's fine. I personally don't like the look, but it's not invalid. --PresN 17:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the highlighted effect on the header cell looks weird when it is the second column. Is the current state fine then? (With the name as the header column) IntGrah (talk) 03:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, I think it is fine now with the name as the first column (+ header). Support promotion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Capaldi filmography

Nominator(s): Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 15:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC), Rusted AutoParts[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I have sourced the contents of the page. This would be part of a FT around Capaldi. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 15:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "His first acting role was in a 1974 play titled An Inspector Calls" - that implies that the play was written or first staged in 1974, which isn't correct. I would suggest "His first acting role was in a 1974 performance of the play An Inspector Calls" Done
• "Living Apart Together" should be in italics, also it would be good to say if it was a TV show or a film as "onscreen appearance" is vague Done
• "He portrayed the twelfth incarnation of the Doctor in Doctor Who (2013–2017) and Malcolm Tucker in The Thick of It (2005–2012)" - I would say it would make more sense to put these in chronological order Done
• "voice acting including, Rabbit" - no reason for that comma Done
• "Chrisopher Robin (2018)" - this is spelt incorrectly, also it should be in italics Done
• "He preformed as Professor Marcus in The Ladykillers." - "performed" is spelt wrong, also title should be in italics, also what was this? Another radio play? Done
• In the tables, roles should sort based on surname where the character had one Done
• Any title starting with "the" should sort based on the next word Done
• "Denotes works that have not yet been released"

- there don't seem to be any so just lose this Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude: Done. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead. Done
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1982 becomes !scope=row | 1982 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead. Done
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. Done

--PresN 20:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Jewish Major League Baseball players

Nominator(s): Omnis Scientia (talk) 19:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because it is a complete as per the given criteria in the article, is well sourced and, IMO, clears the requirements for FLC. To my surprise, the topic of Jewish MLB players is well documented but there was no Wikipedia article on it. So I tried to capture the importance of baseball in Jewish American history and then used a criteria which is strictly for players who identified as Jewish during ("during" being the key word) their MLB careers. I tried to find as many reliable sources as I could and highlighted the star players of their times. I also took inspiration and instruction from similar MLB lists which are featured lists. I hope I did it justice. Omnis Scientia (talk) 19:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• I only have time to look at the lead at the moment, but this is what I got on that:
• No list should start with "the following is a list". Look at other FLCs and find a way to write a more engaging opening.
• "players who have at least one Jewish parent" => "players who have or had at least one Jewish parent"
• Don't have bullet points in the lead, convert this into prose
• "The criteria for this list has" - "criteria" is a plural word so it should be "have"
• Per MOS:NOBOLD, bold should not be used to identify entries meeting certain criteria. Use a symbol like ((doubledagger)) instead
• "an virtual museum" => "a virtual museum"
• "with two players, Hank Greenberg and Sandy Koufax being considered" => "with two players, Hank Greenberg and Sandy Koufax, being considered"
• More later -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:33, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @ChrisTheDude, thank you. Will be adding your suggestions ASAP. Omnis Scientia (talk) 16:39, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Right, I've rewritten the lede with your suggestions. Please give feedback whenever you can. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 17:14, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More comments

• "with Lip Pike being the first one ever" => "with Lip Pike being the first"
• "20th-century" doesn't need a hyphen
• "Jewish players who made it to the Major Leagues often changed their name" => "Jewish players who made it to the Major Leagues often changed their names"
• "at the rampant in the country and the league" => "at the time rampant in the country and the league"
• "and the alleged involvement Jewish crime boss" => "and the alleged involvement of Jewish crime boss"
• "Greenberg played in Detroit which was home to Father Coughlin" => "Greenberg played in Detroit, which was home to Father Coughlin"
• "an antisemitic Catholic priest who used his radio program to broadcast antisemitic commentary and Henry Ford who spread antisemitism through his newspaper" - don't think you need to say "antisemitic" three times in such quick succession. I think you can get away with losing the first one.
• "He faced antisemitism from opposing benches and fans" - yet another one there. Maybe change this one to "abuse"
• "The most famous of those would be Sandy Koufax" => "The most famous of those was Sandy Koufax"
• "While Greenberg and Koufax were the main subjects of the film, the movie also discusses" - these two verbs should be in the same tense
• In the table header, "Major League Team(s)" shouldn't have a capital T on the last word as it isn't a proper noun
• I don't think the teams column needs to be sortable, as it will only ever sort on the first team listed
• Almost all of the image captions in the gallery contain facts which aren't cited anywhere else in the article, so they will need citing here -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @ChrisTheDude, getting right on it. Thanks. Omnis Scientia (talk) 21:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  And good catch with the "antisemitic priest who spread antisemitism" - I didn't realize! Omnis Scientia (talk) 21:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @ChrisTheDude, I got the facts from citations next to each players' names. Its why I didn't add any to the captions. I thought it unnecessary. The rest of the changes you suggested I have done though. ETA: and, of course, the articles of each player list the facts in further detail as well. Omnis Scientia (talk) 21:55, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  For 100% watertight referencing, I would duplicate whichever ref contains the fact in the image caption -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @ChrisTheDude, I've done so and also added a few more references. Omnis Scientia (talk) 12:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @ChrisTheDude, just a reminder that I added the references to the pictures too. Is there anything else that needs to be added or changed? Omnis Scientia (talk) 09:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ ((sronly|caption_text)) instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. |((sort name|Cal|Abrams)) becomes !scope=row |((sort name|Cal|Abrams)). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --PresN 20:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @PresN, I've edited the tables as you have said. No questions but please check if I did it correctly. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 22:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Yep, looks good. --PresN 00:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MPGuy2824

• "existance" to "existence".
• "late 19th-century and" to "late 19th-century, and".
• "This includes players who converted during or before their careers or players who have or had at least one Jewish parent and identified as Jewish by virtue of their parentage." to "This includes players who converted during or before their careers, and players who have or had at least one Jewish parent, and identified as Jewish by virtue of their parentage." Also I'm unsure if the sentence should start with "This" or "These".
• "rampant antisemitism and remain" to "rampant antisemitism, and remain"
• "It also talks about Jewish immigration" to "talked", since that is the tense used in the previous sentence.
• I think you can stop sorting of the notes columns. You should definitely make the Refs columns unsortable.
• The image captions in the gallery aren't full sentences and so don't need full-stops.
• See if you replace "winningest" with something else.
• Run IABot on the article.
• That's all I got for now. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824, done. Omnis Scientia (talk) 18:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support promotion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

World Figure Skating Championships cumulative medal count

Nominator(s): Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because a lot of time was spent by several editors to bring this article in line with Wikipedia standards, including properly formatting the tables so that they meet the requirements of MOS:ACCESS, so that tables display the most up-to-date information with proper sourcing, and so that the formatting matches the formatting used on other quality figure skating articles. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment

• At just two sentences, the lead is much shorter than is expected for a FL. It could do with bulking out with a very brief overview of the history of the event and some key points about the people and nations with most medals. -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:35, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I have expanded the lead per your suggestion. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I too have a drive-by comment. You're missing row and columns scopes in a number of tables, which are crucial for accessibility. See PresN's standard comment here for some advice. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I was sure I had properly formatted all of the tables. I will of course double-check all of them this afternoon and make any appropriate corrections. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Hey man im josh, are you referring to the medals by country tables? If so, that’s a template and I wouldn’t know how to change its parameters. The only thing I could do is render it as a table, which I, of course, can do if necessary. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:14, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  On review, yes, it looks like it's the medals by country tables. I'm actually seeing the same thing with all of medal tables under Wikipedia:Featured_lists#Olympic_and_Paralympic_Games. Is there an exception or are the medal tables formatted in a way that's already accessible @PresN? Hey man im josh (talk) 13:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Assuming we're talking about the ((Medals table)) under e.g. Total medal count by nation, it's fine- the're no visual indication, but the colscopes and rowscopes (using the Nation column cells) are set by the template, I verified in the html. --PresN 14:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  That's good to know, I'll make a mental note of that. Thanks PresN! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of cities in New Brunswick

Nominator(s): B3251 (talk) 00:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I like New Brunswick. I found this nice little list full of eight cities in need of major work, so I've completely rewritten the introduction, made a full revamp to the list and made any necessary updates. Feedback appreciated. Thanks, B3251 (talk) 00:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "New Brunswick saw a reduction from 104 municipalities to 77" - New Brunswick isn't alive so can't see anything, so suggest "The number of municipalities in New Brunswick was reduced from 104 to 77"
• "Municipalities in New Brunswick, of which cities, as well as towns and villages are referred to as, are included" - rather mangled wording here. Would be better as "Cities, towns and villages in New Brunswick are referred to as municipalities and all are included"
• "in Local governments in the province" - no reason for capital L, mid-sentence
• "has wards in their municipal governments" => "has wards in its municipal governments"
• "has a "Hybrid" council type," - don't think the H needs to be a capital (also in the note)
• "As of 2021, the largest city by population in New Brunswick is Moncton" => As of 2021, the largest city by population in New Brunswick was Moncton" (2021 was three years ago so present tense is not appropriate)
• "and the smallest is Campbellton" - as above
• "Additionally, Saint John is the first incorporated city in future New Brunswick and Canada overall" => "Additionally, Saint John was the first incorporated city in the future New Brunswick and Canada overall"
• That's what I got. Nice work on expanding the article. I have been to New Brunswick but I don't recall if I liked it as it was over 40 years ago :-S -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you, and  Done. B3251 (talk) 08:45, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Second one still needs doing..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:35, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @ChrisTheDude Missed that one, whoops.  Done B3251 (talk) 17:45, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:51, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At 8 entries, this seems a little short to be a featured list, but more importantly, it's also unclear why it exists at all given List of municipalities in New Brunswick (FL) exists. It's the first 8 rows of that table, with the council type/size added (and different incorporation dates, for some reason). How is this not just a content fork? --PresN 20:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's a fair question to ask, though I am not the one who created the article so I'm unsure if I could answer it. All that I've pretty much done is do as much as I possibly could to expand onto the article so it stands better as a standalone list, though both articles (list for cities & list for municipalities) were created/promoted as FLC through the same editor. Would it be worth pinging them to ask? Furthermore, would it be beneficial to include former cities to provide leeway for more content to be included into the article? B3251 (talk) 01:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hwy43: Pinging article creator for further opinion. B3251_(talk) 21:22, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While no nomination is the same, here is an example of another successful FLC with eight entries. In Canada, we have numerous topics for populated places. ((Canada topic|List of communities in)) is inclusive of both incorporated and unincorporated communities. ((Canada topic|List of municipalities in)) is for those communities that are incorporated only. That topic contains 13 FLs – one for each province and territory. ((Canada topic|List of cities in)), ((Canada topic|List of towns in)), ((Canada topic|List of villages in)), etc., are subsets or child lists of their parents within ((Canada topic|List of municipalities in)).

In the past, there have been discussions on these. There are contradictions between WP:NOTPAPER and WP:CFORK. The best way to address CFORK is to make sure this list article has sufficient additional detail that expands upon the content at List of municipalities in New Brunswick specific to cities in New Brunswick. To do so, I have suggested additional information on former cities and other communities that are eligible for city status. See List of cities in Alberta as compared to List of municipalities in Alberta. The former/child list has more detail with respect to administration of the cities compared to the latter/parent list. It also has the two additional sets of info I just mentioned.

I know that New Brunswick has at least one former city – Portland, New Brunswick. Riverview, New Brunswick, Quispamsis, and Rothesay, New Brunswick all appear to be eligible for city status.

@B3251: can you explain why the incorporation dates in this article differ than those in the parent municipalities list? I have a theory why but don't want to assume. Hwy43 (talk) 04:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Very well done list, but isn't this just a fork of List of municipalities in New Brunswick? Mattximus (talk) 14:44, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Mattximus, please refer to my reply to PresN above regarding this. I don't think I could give a clear answer on this as I'm not the creator of the list, I just did as much as I could to improve/expand onto it and make it more standalone-specific for cities rather than being what information was already provided in List of municipalities in New Brunswick. This list article was created by the same editor who co-nominated the municipalities list with you, so I proposed pinging them here to hear from them. If you would like to possibly give your opinion, that would be much appreciated. Thanks, B3251 (talk) 14:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ ((sronly|caption_text)) instead.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell; you have them for most, but they're missing on the second row of headers.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. || [[Bathurst, New Brunswick|Bathurst]] becomes !scope=row | [[Bathurst, New Brunswick|Bathurst]]. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --PresN 20:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

   Done Screen-reader caption, !scope="col" added to second row of headers, !scope=row added to primary cells (city names).

  I've made the fixes with some additional changes with the sortbottom classes at the bottom that may/may not have needed to have been made. How did I do? @PresN B3251 (talk) 21:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Looks good from that standpoint, though see my comment above. --PresN 00:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

Source review: Passed

• Reliable enough for the information being cited
• Consistent date formatting
• Consistent and proper reference formatting
• Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
• Spot checks on 10 sources match what they are being cited for

Feedback:

• Ref 15 – Please downcase to title case instead of all caps

Source review passes. Support (without taking into consideration whether this should have been split). Hey man im josh (talk) 15:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did not get a response on here, but I do see that you downcased the reference appropriately. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for not responding sooner. Thanks, B3251 (talk) 22:07, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of World Heritage Sites in Morocco

Nominator(s): Tone 08:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]