This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to see what can be done to bring it up to A or GA status
Thanks, Zonafan39 (talk) 15:24, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Some general comments from Ruby2010
I see that this has been sitting uncommented for a while, and thought I'd add my two cents. :) (I lived in Milwaukee for a few years).
- I recommend breaking up the first sentence in the lead
- Make sure all sentences have reliable sources (I see that this is currently uncited: The visible trusses at the top of the building near the U.S. Bank sign are also sometimes lit in appropriate colors to signify events such as holidays. In the week leading up to the 2007-08 NFC Championship Game they were lit in green and yellow in tribute to the Green Bay Packers. This was done again during the week leading up to the Packers appearance in the 2010 NFC Championship Game on January 16, 2011 in Chicago.)
- Topped off August 29, 1972 -> Topped off on August 29, 1972; also, is "topped off" the right phrase to use here? It sounds a bit colloquial (but then again I know next to nothing about architecture!)
- I noticed the lack of a reception section (how is it viewed by architects? the general public?) I'm not sure if this is a typical section for architecture articles though
- Use ((Template:Press release)) for Ref 25
- No dab links but I noted one deadlink
This doesn't seem that far off from a GA. I would solicit the advice of someone from WP: Architecture if you like, or you can just see what the GA reviewer has to say. Ruby 2010/2013 21:45, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you very much, you have been very helpful. Zonafan39 (talk) 05:57, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]