Image:Newedition_1.jpg
[edit]No evidence that uploader is copyright holder. Videmus Omnia Talk 00:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Aneesh_palamattam.jpg
[edit]source is questionable cohesion 00:33, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:GreteMosheimPassportPhoto.jpg
[edit]If you get a dead person's passport, do you own copyright to the photo? Videmus Omnia Talk 00:50, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Clearly not, but she's dead, so it probably satisfies the NFCC. Still needs a UR. Image kept. -- But|seriously|folks 03:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Greek_diplomatic_passport_1987.JPG
[edit]Derivative work, I don't think uploader owns copyright to Greek passports. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair use, still needs UR. Keeping image. -- But|seriously|folks 03:26, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Austrian_passport_1931.JPG
[edit]Derivative work, don't think uploader owns copyright to Austrian passports either. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair use only. Keeping image. -- But|seriously|folks 03:28, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Or UK passports. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:07, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- See also [1] re UK passports Sfan00 IMG 15:29, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Or American passports. Probably public domain, not CC. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Kept - retagged ((PD-USGov)) The Evil Spartan 04:23, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Swiss_passport_1956.JPG
[edit]Swiss passport... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- 70 years, still under copyright, nonfree only. Kept. -- But|seriously|folks 06:49, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Danish_passport_1952.JPG
[edit]Danish passport... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Going with non-free use only. Kept. -- But|seriously|folks 06:54, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:1952_Belgian_passport.JPG
[edit]Belgian passport... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Going with non-free use only. Kept. -- But|seriously|folks 06:57, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:1951_Convention_Travel_Document.JPG
[edit]U.N. travel document... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Good law school exam question. Presuming under copyright and non-free use only. Kept. -- But|seriously|folks 07:00, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Spain_passport_1963.JPG
[edit]Spanish passport... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- 70 years, under copyright, non-free use only. Kept. -- But|seriously|folks 07:04, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Norway_passport_1923.JPG
[edit]Norwegian passport... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Non-free only in the US for now. Kept. -- But|seriously|folks 07:10, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:New_Zealand_passport_1949.JPG
[edit]Kiwi passport... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Non-free only. Kept. -- But|seriously|folks 07:15, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Thailand_passport_1960.JPG
[edit]Thai passport... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Non-free only. Kept. -- But|seriously|folks 07:16, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Philippines_passport_1969.JPG
[edit]Pilipino pasaporte... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Non-free only. Kept. -- But|seriously|folks 07:18, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Malaysia_passport_1968.JPG
[edit]Malaysian passport... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Non-free only. Kept. -- But|seriously|folks 07:20, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Japan_passport_1968.JPG
[edit]Japanese passport... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Non-free only. Kept. -- But|seriously|folks 07:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Rico_J_Puno_The_Way_We_Were.jpg
[edit]this image is from flickr, it doesn't appear to have been posted by the image creator however cohesion 02:17, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
-
-
- Right, but this isn't the actual source of the image, just the source of a derivative. We need the actual source, and license, from the entity that created the image. - cohesion 03:06, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed. Fair use at best. -- But|seriously|folks 00:51, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair use tags used; updated details on image page. Thanks. - Dragonbite 02:03, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Information on original image creators/copyright holders provided by flickr photographer and now posted on image talk page. - Dragonbite 00:54, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm removing the PUI tag, it's tagged a non-free now, with rationale etc. - cohesion 01:26, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Ikarbus-desktop-01.jpg
[edit]Taken from the company website here. Uploader claims PD-self, but this is not supported on the website. — Rlandmann 02:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Image:Unipetrol.gif
[edit]Company logo that Uploader claims PD_self for. — Rlandmann 03:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Apart from the two above, User:Mario1987 has been very busy over the last two days uploading images from various corporate websites all under a PD-self tag. These include:
Image:200347.jpg
Image:Nedenumit.jpg
Image:Golanski-Pawel.jpg
Image:Camus.jpg
Image:25866 ionut rada.jpg
Image:Herea.jpg
Image:Kostolac-b.jpg
Image:Bucuresti-sud.jpg
Image:Romgaz.gif
Image:Fdfee transilvaniasud poza1.jpg
Image:Fd t sud fig3 en.gif
Image:Emd.gif
Image:ETN.gif
Image:Cuprom.jpg
Image:Sigla3d.gif
Image:F11a.jpg
Image:Sigla.jpg
Image:Logo grup feroviar roman.jpg
Image:Top logo.gif
Image:ButanGas.jpg
Image:HVB Tiriac Bank.gif
Image:Petromservice.jpg
Image:Supplier1.jpg
Image:Interagro.jpg
Image:Rompetrol 2in.gif
Image:Antena1 ro.jpg
Image:233 crowne.gif
Image:Astra uniqa.gif
Image:Unireash.png
Image:Sigla-SCR.jpg
Image:Rcs rds.jpg
Image:Romanbrasov.jpg
Image:0 homed.gif
Image:Altex.jpg
Image:Img romstal1.jpg
Image:Elvila.jpg
Image:Rtc3.jpg
Image:Mobexpert.jpg
Image:Iulius mall.png
Image:180px-Cotidianul.gif
Image:Fildas.jpg
Image:Romsis.jpg
Image:Cristim.jpg
Image:Omnilogic.gif
Image:Rafo.jpg
Image:Gsp.jpg
Image:RTB Bor.jpg
Image:RBB.jpg
Image:RBM.jpg
Image:RTB TIR.jpg
Image:Yugoimport.gif
Image:Jugopetrol.gif
Image:Belupo.gif
Image:2319 Prodaja en.jpg
Image:2320 Izvoz en.jpg
Image:Zentiva.gif
I realise that company logos are usable under fair use provisions, but in most cases, the article itself was a copyvio and has already been speedied. In many other cases, the logo is being used to simply decorate another article not directly related to the company in question. Finally, there are a few photos in there of various sportspeople that I doubt that Mario1987 took himself. --Rlandmann 04:31, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that there also was no source listed for any of his images, that powerplant photos were watermarked, and that all logos were orphaned. Calliopejen1 19:43, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:CRAZY copy.gif
[edit]Screenshot copyright should belong to the software creator, not the person who made the screenshot. --Richmeistertalk 14:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- what about the person who made the screen show what's shot? --Alvestrand 23:46, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:All_star_cashhh.jpg
[edit]PD claim - source unconfirmable... Sfan00 IMG 15:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
PD Claim - Canadian Road sign design copyright is Crown Copyright surely? Sfan00 IMG 15:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The shield design was established in 1930 (see [2]), therefore Crown Copyright would have expired based on the 50-year rule, even the somewhat modified crown designs of the "Group 4" designs from 1955 which still seems to be the basic design today. Dl2000 16:21, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Kept. -- But|seriously|folks 07:26, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Canadian Road sign- Crown copyright surely? Sfan00 IMG 16:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Kept. -- But|seriously|folks 07:28, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Canadian Road Sign - Crown cipyright surely? Sfan00 IMG 16:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Allow me to explain... I drew the images in Photoshop, but the shield itself is in the public domain, as it was created in March of 1930 by the Department of Highways of Ontario (now today's Ministry of Transportation. I suppose it would be a dual PD-self and PD-canada license. Perhaps i should make a license just for ontario's highway shields to simplify things like this? RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 17:44, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You could explain the situation in the image summary :) Sfan00 IMG 10:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Kept. -- But|seriously|folks 07:28, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
User has uploaded multiple images falsely under a GFDL license. There three I haven't found the source for. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 17:33, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Mattmorgan.jpg
- Image:Chris-benoit-bio.jpg
- Image:Cody 1 83x64.jpg
Image:Jakoby známka.jpg
[edit]very likely not GFDL image After Midnight 0001 21:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Image of a stamp, the majority of which is a copyrighted painting. Calliopejen1 20:19, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Sephra-chocolate-fountain-CF44.jpg and Image:Sephra-chocolate-fountain-CF18-M.jpg
[edit]Both images are from this page, which indicates "These photos are offered to Sephra clients to be used for your own marketing or other purposes free of charge." That does not appear to be equivalent to GFDL as claimed. Chick Bowen 23:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Commons image showing through. -- But|seriously|folks 07:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:ChamplainCollegeSeal.jpg
[edit]This is the seal to a college, which undoubtedly owns and enforces the copyright. It's been posted under a GFDL license. Esrever 23:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've updated the liscensing to reflect that it's a Non-free Logo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Surette (talk • contribs) 20:57, August 24, 2007 (UTC)
- Kept. -- But|seriously|folks 07:33, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:DandA_2004_Cover1.jpg
[edit]PD album cover? This may have been uploaded by the creator though, so... cohesion 23:33, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
