< December 2 December 4 >

December 3

[edit]

Image:ECHO-10202007.JPG

[edit]

Need OTRS confirmation to be sure. Jusjih 00:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1suelee.JPG

[edit]

Uploader claimed PD-self then Susiemd blanked it while it is not fully sure if the PD-self claim is true, so comments are hereby requested. Jusjih 01:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Burfurd_house.jpg

[edit]

Need OTRS confirmation of the claimed GFDL licensing. Jusjih 01:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ANZCA_Interior.jpg

[edit]

Need OTRS confirmation of claimed permission. Jusjih 01:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Shotokan_Tiger.gif

[edit]

Uploader claimed PD-Art then blanked it while it does not seem to be very old. Jusjih 02:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:

Image:World_Trade_Center_Observation_Deck_New_York_City_1999_corrected.jpg

[edit]

The original Flickr image is licensed cc-by-nc-sa-2.0. Need comments for fair use as the building was destroyed on 11 September 2007. Jusjih 02:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Commons description page says it was originally cc-by-sa-2.0. Archive.org confirms that other photos by this person were originally under the non-commercial version. Keep. --- RockMFR 06:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You mean keep the image here, but with or without nc? If with nc, fair use will be needed for downstream commercial users. Meanwhile, commons:Image:World Trade Center Observation Deck New York City 1999.jpg is under regular deletion nomination as well. I cannot find image licensing history from Flickr, but if anyone can prove that it was ever licensed under cc-by-2.0, I will withdraw my nominations here and on Commons.--Jusjih 19:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Without nc. The copyright holder can't unlicense this image. --- RockMFR 06:15, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Elisabetta_Canalis_a_lungo_fidanzata_con_Bobo_Vieri_1-1-.jpg

[edit]

No evidence of GFDL at given source, which posts a copyright notice. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Det1sn.jpg

[edit]

A movie poster which is unlikely to be GFDL. WODUP 02:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mahatmat.jpg

[edit]

Appears to be a screenshot of a movie or television show, and the uploader has uploaded another possibly unfree image, Image:Det1sn.jpg. WODUP 02:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Azathar_pic..jpg

[edit]

First presumed GFDL, then uploader gave permission, then said to be used on his/her user page only. Jusjih 02:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MaziyarBizhani.jpg

[edit]

No evidence for given license. MER-C 04:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mc52.jpg

[edit]

Claim of pd-self doubtful. --- RockMFR 06:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Battle-3t.jpg

[edit]

No indication this is released under GFDL by copyright holder. Press organizations often traveled with marines, so it's quite possibly copyrighted. The Evil Spartan 06:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blestyashchie.jpg

[edit]

appears professional, unless we are to believe littledaniel snapped a high-quality photo of them on their hypothetical trip to England. The Evil Spartan 06:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LennaK1.jpg

[edit]

obviously a professional image The Evil Spartan 06:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bulldogs2004.jpg

[edit]

No reason to believe abc.net.au photo is copyright free. The Evil Spartan 07:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Panthers2003.jpg

[edit]

no reason to believe this is public domain. The Evil Spartan 07:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Roosters2002.jpg

[edit]

no reason to believe this is public domain. The Evil Spartan 07:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Brisbane2000.jpg

[edit]

no reason to believe this is public domain. The Evil Spartan 07:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tigers2005.jpg

[edit]

no reason to believe this is public domain. The Evil Spartan 07:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JoshHannay.jpg

[edit]

no reason to believe this is public domain. The Evil Spartan 07:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:TravisNorton.jpg

[edit]

no reason to believe this is public domain. The Evil Spartan 07:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MattSing.jpg

[edit]

no reason to believe this is public domain. The Evil Spartan 07:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More