< July 17 | July 19 > |
---|
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
2 pictures have been unploaded with a licence which it is self created and one which says commons file.Adyarboy 18:09, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 00:29, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What more verification do you need? Thanks
CCASA2.5' SkierRMH (talk) 07:07, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by TheDJ (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
reason this image is not PD
This image is mine, I didn't upload it but it was sourced from my flickr page : http://www.flickr.com/photos/spudmurphy/159182704/in/set-72157594153825948/, I have added a note to the flickr page to denote my ownership and connection to this image on wikipedia. I have set the permissions on this file to be Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0. Dkeeshan 01:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Ral315 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unknown Copyright status. Poster of image has not provided substantial Copyright info. CoolKid1993 05:26, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Jeffrey O. Gustafson (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged as uploader-created GFDL, but uploader used the same tag for this album cover, and this looks like a professional promo shot. But|seriously|folks 20:41, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]