The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

looks like screen capture Secretlondon 04:22, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Correct license & FUR supplied SkierRMH (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 09:57, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Permission is for Wikipedia use, not necessarily other use. Perhaps emailing the webmaster could get a totally free license. Calliopejen1 07:58, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, it's extremely unlikely that the webmaster even has authority to grant permission for its use here. Calliopejen1 22:02, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now listed as non-free screenshot. -- But|seriously|folks  18:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fan made from various sources. bluemask ^(talk) 08:10, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged with PD release but no identification of source or copyright holder or other documentation on PD.  But|seriously|folks  09:52, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Source is given as [1]; image description page claims ((GFDL-no-disclaimers)). At the bottom of [2] is the statement "© Copyright 2004, Foundation Open Society Institute - Macedonia." There seems to be no mention of the GFDL on the site [3]. —Bkell (talk) 18:54, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

no evidence of public domain After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 19:02, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, orphan anyways. Calliopejen1 11:55, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I6 by East718 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

no evidence of public domain After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 19:02, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to ((non-free logo)), which seems most likely. Calliopejen1 11:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I6 by East718 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

no evidence of public domain After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 19:02, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to ((non-free logo)), which seems most likely. Calliopejen1 11:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

no evidence of public domain After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 19:02, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, orphan anyways. Calliopejen1 11:57, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

likely copyvio After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 19:54, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's get rid of the PD tag and add a logo tag plus a rationale instead. Will that make you happy? -- M (^speak/_spoken) 20:42, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

resolved --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 21:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Butseriouslyfolks (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader may not actually be the person who took the photo, see User talk:Mwhs#Image:Akuete.gif. We need more source information and possibly OTRS verfication. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 21:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• User:Mwhs is a role account used by the Mami Wata Healers Society of North America, Inc., of which "Mama Zogbe", real name Vivian Hunter-Hindrew, is the founder. - ∅ (∅), 19:36, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is some dispute whether this is a role account, and OTRS should still be utilized. Two months have passed. Deleted. -- But|seriously|folks  18:20, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.