< April 15 | April 17 > |
---|
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cannot confirm PD status. Kelly hi! 00:01, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I3 by Caulde (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of PD status, source site has copyright notice. Kelly hi! 00:26, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of PD status at given source. Kelly hi! 00:28, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Permission claimed, but no OTRS link. Kelly hi! 00:34, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cannot confirm PD status. Kelly hi! 00:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Permission claimed, but no OTRS link. Kelly hi! 03:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Can't confirm PD status. Kelly hi! 03:14, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was kept, license updated.
--Kelly hi! 11:57, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can't confirm PD status. Kelly hi! 03:16, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
According to given source, this is a product of the State of Kentucky, and I can't confirm PD status as claimed. Kelly hi! 03:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OTRS permission missing. Kelly hi! 04:08, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Can't confirm PD, source website given shows copyright notice. Kelly hi! 04:17, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Can't confirm PD status based on this page at Commons. Kelly hi! 04:21, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Can't confirm PD status. Kelly hi! 04:25, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Can't confirm PD status. Kelly hi! 04:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence for the free license, especially given the user's upload history. Mosmof (talk) 04:36, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of PD release at given source. Kelly hi! 04:40, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Can't confirm PD status. The given source is likely not the copyright holder of the photo. Kelly hi! 04:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of PD status at given source. Kelly hi! 04:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cannot confirm from given source that this flag is in the public domain. Kelly hi! 04:52, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cannot confirm PD license. Kelly hi! 04:55, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cannot confirm PD license. Kelly hi! 04:55, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cannot confirm PD status of image. Kelly hi! 04:56, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cannot confirm PD status of image. Endless Dan 12:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
website given (site, down, wayback machine has page existing at the time this was uploaded, but no info), website in foreign language and still exists (home page) MECU≈talk 13:32, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
website given (image is there) is Iowa community college, is this the work of the uploader? could not find HTML page of image, uplodaer absent MECU≈talk 13:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I3 by MBisanz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
who is "David S. Wolfe"? It's not the uploader (see userpage), absent uploader MECU≈talk 13:43, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This image has PUBLIC DOMAIN written/visible IN/ON the image. Deletion was idiotic and in poor judgment. Power users be-damned for not looking/reading with their own two eyes. -goney3
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
source given is subject of photo, but pd-user used, no permission statement or OTRS, uplodaer not likely subject MECU≈talk 13:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC) Reply: Do not delete. This I have collected after much effort. I am fully responsible and authorized by the subject of the photo to scan and publish it. - Faizul Latif Chowdhury.[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence permission was to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 14:18, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence that permission was granted to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 14:25, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence permission was given to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 14:27, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was image kept, good license.
--Kelly hi! 15:18, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OTRS permission has been pending since January. Kelly hi! 15:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
lack of evidence that uploaded is the author Genisock2 (talk) 15:52, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I3 by Avraham (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
looks pro lack of evidence that uploader is author. Genisock2 (talk) 15:53, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Have been unable to asitane if the uploader holds the copyright on this pic Genisock2 (talk) 16:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
lack of evidence that uploader is Alexander Kayambakis Genisock2 (talk) 16:16, 16 April 2008 (UTC) Image is Official press photo used by Noora Noor. All use on internet is bought out by record company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eivindbr (talk • contribs) 18:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No OTRS link to permission. Kelly hi! 16:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cannot confirm PD status. Kelly hi! 17:35, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of GFDL in the source. Rettetast (talk) 21:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of GFDL in the source. Rettetast (talk) 21:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of GFDL in the source. Rettetast (talk) 21:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of GFDL in the source. Rettetast (talk) 21:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of GFDL in the source. Rettetast (talk) 21:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Gwernol (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of GFDL in the source. Rettetast (talk) 21:06, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of GFDL in the source. Rettetast (talk) 21:06, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of GFDL in the source. Rettetast (talk) 21:06, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of GFDL in the source. Rettetast (talk) 21:06, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of GFDL in the source. Rettetast (talk) 21:07, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of GFDL in the source. Rettetast (talk) 21:07, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of GFDL in the source. Rettetast (talk) 21:07, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of GFDL in the source. Rettetast (talk) 21:08, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of GFDL in the source. Rettetast (talk) 21:08, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of GFDL in the source. Rettetast (talk) 21:09, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]