The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Wizardman (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

promotional material from ABS-CBN for Super Inggo bluemask ^(talk) 03:51, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I3 by Wknight94 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All his other uploads have been a mess of copyright violations and I'm doubtful that this is legitimate. Otherwise, orphaned and probably UE. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I3 by Wknight94 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence the image is Public Domain. Polly (Parrot) 21:07, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Marine 69-71 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence the image is Public Domain. Polly (Parrot) 21:20, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by Maxim (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image not found at given source, bad license tags. Kelly ^hi! 22:12, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. We can't ensure that the pages where the images are found are not altered forever thus deleting the each image taken from a site which was changed or simply went down. The image is obviously PD due to age. --Irpen 06:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's obviously PD - the subject of the photo died in 1944, and he appears aged in the photo. PD in Russia is life of the creator plus 70 years. Kelly ^hi! 16:19, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First, when you invoke one reason for deletion (lack of source) and than switch to the peculiarities of the Russian law in the course of discussion, it does not impress well. This is too Abu badali-like to be nice. Your first rationale for deletion is just senseless. We cannot revise all images hosted at WMF every minute any old site dies, gets revised or goes off-line. Second, the provision of the Russian law you site only works when an author is known (it is not) and the image does not belong to the Soviet legal entity. Here the author is unknown, the image is from 1936 and the publication date (rather than anyone's lifetime) defines the status. A general comment, the image patroller acting with greater sensitivity tends to be much more successful in his drive for a free content. --Irpen 18:49, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I1 by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional photo, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly (Parrot) 22:38, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of CC license Rettetast (talk) 23:00, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.