< August 22 | August 24 > |
---|
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of being under GFDL. --aktsu (t / c) 00:39, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Jimfbleak (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of being under GFDL. Source says "copyright © SFUK all rights reserved, please email us for permission to use any info or graphics on this site". --aktsu (t / c) 00:46, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Copied from http://www.ssjstudio.net/page11.htm and no evidence of it being licenced under GFDL. --aktsu (t / c) 00:57, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm guessing ClaudioProductions (talk · contribs) didn't create the logo for the SSJ-gym, so this should probably either be deleted or changed to comply to the fair-use policies for logos. --aktsu (t / c) 02:24, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I6 by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The magazine cover appears to only be used as 'filler' in both articles, none makes mention of this specific cover in which it would be required for encyclopaedic content. Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 07:00, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It has been created using unfree images collection. OsamaKReply? on my talk page, please 08:00, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Chris G (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Screenshot - NOT PD Self Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:47, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: kept with license updated Skier Dude (talk) 02:16, 26 February 2012 (UTC) Screnshot - Not PD Self - Belived uploader has several images with wrong tags Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:48, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Screenshot - NOT PD Self - Uploader has other images with same issue Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:51, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Screenshot - NOT PD Self - uploader has simmilar images :( Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:52, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Srceenshot - NOT PD Self - (See previous listings- Uploader has many images with this issue) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:53, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Screenshot - NOT PD Sef Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:54, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(See previous listings) - Same issue Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:55, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Screenshot - NOT PD Self Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:55, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sceenshot - NOT PD Self Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:56, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly derived image - Reffered to PUI for comment Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:01, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Low quality image - looks like possible scan? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:03, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The image was taken from the band's MySpace page. There is no indication that the image is freely licensed as similar images are often copyrighted. It is worth noting that the band's music has been released freely. Seraphim♥Whipp 16:33, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Blatantly non-free, made up of newspaper clippings. J Milburn (talk) 21:00, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Only source info is "Photo from the French Senate", but even if that is the case I'm pretty sure that doesn't automaticaly mean it's public domain. Sherool (talk) 23:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Uploader claims this image is both the work of the U.S. government and published before 1923, but provides no sourcing information on which to verify either of these claims. State of Arizona's archives contain an identical image with a clear claim of copyright.[1] --Allen3 talk 23:27, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
GFDL Claim but has Fair USE Rationale? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:59, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Only information on the is "university of Georgia", assuming that is the source it still does not explain why the uploader believe this image to be in the public domain, universities generaly does not release photots into the public domain. Sherool (talk) 15:02, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]