No evidence of GFDL release B (talk) 00:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Updated tages & rationale. Sf46 (talk) 23:44, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image kept. -Nv8200p talk

Uploader doesn't provide proof he/she holds the copyright to the image. Rockfang (talk) 03:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader does not prove he/she has the authority to release the image as free use. Rockfang (talk) 03:16, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader does not establish authority to release image under GNU Free D.L. Rockfang (talk) 03:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader says that he took this picture and licenses it as GFDL, but this seems suspicious, because of the size and the quality of image, and because this users' practices style look a lot like those of User:Marina T., who was blocked for uploading dozens of badly licensed images. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 08:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader stated it was taken from www.paddedroom.net (a web site that seems to have gone), but put a PD-self tag on it. An IP turned up this morning and added that the photo was by "Kim Anderson", so maybe it is. Uploader doesn't seem to have the rights to release it into the public domain at any rate. • Anakin ^{(contribs • complaints)} 13:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how the uploader owns the copyright to an image created by the Malaysian government. Mosmof (talk) 17:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Same as above - image apparently belongs to the Malay government but the uploader claims PD-self. Mosmof (talk) 18:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Same as above - image apparently belongs to the Malay government but the uploader claims PD-self. Mosmof (talk) 18:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another improper PD-self image, owned by the Royal Malay Police. Mosmof (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

probably belongs to government like the above images, same uploader MECU≈talk 20:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

probably belongs to government like the above images, same uploader MECU≈talk 20:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

derivative Nv8200p talk 20:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]