The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept with the copyrighted elements removed and the image containing this deleted - Peripitus (Talk) 01:22, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ruby slippers.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unless the uploader created the exhibit, he doesn't hold the copyright on the included text description. Dragons flight (talk) 01:15, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Text has been cropped out of the photo.--RadioFan (talk) 01:51, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Larryo8x10.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be taken from this sports memorabilia merchant: http://www.sportsmemorabilia.com/sports-products/larry-obannon-lousiville-cardinals-8x10-photo1.html

Considering all the red flags - photo converted to a GIF, a high-quality photo tightly cropped and reduced, and the autograph - hard to believe this is a free image without a less flimsy description. Mosmof (talk) 04:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Claudiutobol.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Edit derivative of the image that this is a cropped version of. Appears to be an edited professional posed image Peripitus (Talk) 05:58, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luismiguel96.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a screenshot, no indication that the uploader owns the copyright to this file. — ξ^xplicit 07:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wolfhudsonstar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Low-res, metadata from QuickTime rather than a camera. Probably snagged from the web somewhere. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:52, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - commons deletion debate resolved that the design is too simple to attract copyright - Peripitus (Talk) 01:26, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:WhiteSwirl.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/File:WhiteSwirl.svg 94.193.242.248 (talk) 20:57, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.