The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of this discussion was delete. Per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States, the US does not allow free images of public art (unless they are no longer under copyright, i.e. pre-1923). This appears to have been installed in 2006. -Andrew c ^[talk] 22:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted 3-D artwork. –Dream out loud (talk) 03:45, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Does freedom of panorama apply here? Stifle (talk) 11:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:13, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

no proof that uploader is the (c) holder of this screenshot Skier Dude (talk) 05:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. As the history shows, I have personally confirmed the permission for this image with the image subject (Michael Buckley). The uploader is Buckley's brother-in-law and was instructed to upload and release the image under the specified license. --auburnpilot talk 19:19, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps to clarify any doubt the confirmation email should be sent into the WP:OTRS system. MilborneOne (talk) 21:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:13, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, appears to be screenshot, no target article/encyc use given Skier Dude (talk) 05:45, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

scan of a book, claims to be "gift to me", target article unclear Skier Dude (talk) 05:54, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Looks like the source was "North Louisiana History" journal, but I can't easily ascertain which issue. (Only that it is page 44 of whichever issue it is.) That said, the image in the article Earl Williamson appears to have been cropped from this one. Given that Mr. Williamson is deceased, it may be proper to allow the cropped image to be kept as "fair use" (as defined by Wikipedia). Crypticfirefly (talk) 06:29, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

scan of a book, claims to be "gift to me" Skier Dude (talk) 05:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• This appears to have been cropped from the image listed above, image:EW 07-06-~2 (2).JPG, which in turn appears to have been taken from "North Louisiana History" journal, aka North Louisiana Historical Association Journal.[1] Given that Mr. Williamson is deceased, it may be proper to allow the cropped image to be kept as "fair use" (as defined by Wikipedia). Crypticfirefly (talk) 06:33, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:13, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scan of book - no date given, claims to be "gift to me" Skier Dude (talk) 05:59, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:13, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image is found at Flickr here: http://flickr.com/photos/jezevec/1679360783/ But the license is "all rights reserved". If the Wikipedia uploader is also the Flickr uploader, then they should re-license the photo to a compatible license. Mosmof (talk) 06:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:13, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

highly unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 06:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:13, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, highly unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 06:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:13, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Tribune India website does not assert PD. — neuro^(talk) 19:45, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:13, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Listed as "PD-Self" but the image page notes that this is a "Music video picture" - appears to be a screen capture not a free image Peripitus (Talk) 23:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.